Booklet 4 Flashcards

observations, interviews, questionaires, data types

1
Q

What are observations?

A

Non experimental method of research
Involves researcher watching participants for behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Naturalistic observation

A

Involves observing behaviour in its natural environment- researcher simply records what they can see

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Strength of naturalistic observations

A

High ecological validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Limitation of naturalistic observations

A

Low internal validity as little control of extraneous variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Controlled observations

A

Usually carried out in a psychology lab
Researcher decides where, when and who
Standardised procedure
Participants randomly allocated to groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Strengths of controlled observations

A

Higher internal validity so more control of extraneous variables
High reliability as has standardised procedure which can be repeated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Limitation of controlled observations

A

Less ecological validity as artificial task and setting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Participant observation

A

Observer joins group- taking part in activities while also observing
Often means writing up later

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Strength of participant observation

A

Greater insight into behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Limitations of participant observations

A

More prone to researcher bias as can consciously or unconsciously influence behaviour
Involves retrospective reporting which may be inaccurate so lacks internal validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Non participant observation

A

Observer just watches activities- doesn’t take part

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Strengths of non participant observation

A

Results recorded in real time so more accurate so higher internal validity
Less prone to researcher bias as don’t directly interact with group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Limitation of non participant observation

A

Less insight into behaviour as can see a behaviour has happened but might not know why

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Overt observation

A

Also known as disclosed observations
Participants give permission for their behaviour to be observed
Aware of presence of researcher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Strength of overt observations

A

More ethical as can give informed consent and able to withdraw

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Limitation of overt observations

A

Prone to demand characteristics

17
Q

Covert observations

A

Also known as undisclosed observations
Participants don’t know their behaviour is being observed
Unlikely to have consented

18
Q

Strength of covert observations

A

Less likely to observe demand characteristics

19
Q

Limitations of covert observations

A

Unable to give informed consent so invasion of privacy

20
Q

Time sampling

A

When an observer records behaviour at set intervals

21
Q

Event sampling

A

When an observer records the number of times a certain behaviour occurs

22
Q

How can researcher bias be reduced in observations?

A

Operationalised behaviours

23
Q

Inter observer reliability

A

The extent to which two or more researchers are observing and recording behaviour in the same way
They observe the same situation separately then compare results - looking for a correlation of +0.8 or above

24
Q

Describe self report methods

A

Non experimental
Includes questionaires and interviews
Participant shares thoughts, feelings, beliefs and opinions

25
Primary data - describe and evaluate
Data collected firsthand by the researcher for the purpose of their research Strengths- relevant to their research -more accurate as collected by researcher Limitations- time consuming
26
Secondary data- describe and evaluate
Information someone else has collected for a different purpose Strengths- less time consuming Limitations- lower internal validity/ may not be directly relevant -less confidence in accuracy as collected by someone else
27
Quantitative data- describe and evaluate
Data in the form of numbers Strengths- less subjective -can be summarised using descriptive statistics or displayed as a graph Limitations- less insight into behaviour
28
Qualitative data- describe and evaluate
Non numerical data/ data in the form of words Strengths- more insight into behaviour Limitations- subjective so potentially biased -challenging to summarise/ analyse
29
Structured interviews- describe and evaluate
When questions are standardised- same questions and order for every participant Strengths- easy to replicate -standardised which reduces researcher bias Limitations- can't deviate so important info may be missed/ less insight -time consuming to set up in advance
30
Unstructured interviews- describe and evaluate
More like a conversation- only thing decided in advance is topic Strengths- can ask relevant follow up questions to gain insight Limitations- potential for bias as interviewer may unconsciously or consciously influence -hard to replicate - expensive to train interviewer
31
Interviewer bias
The actions of the interviewer that may consciously or unconsciously influence the responses
32
What is a questionaire?
Set of written questions Collect information about participants Can be administered in person, by post or online
33
Open questions- describe and evaluate
Doesn't restrict response in any way so can answer freely Strengths- provide in depth qualitative data -answers more likely to represent true thoughts and feelings of participant Limitations- answer may be irrelevant -subjective data -hard to analyse data/ responses
34
Closed questions- describe and evaluate
Presents a limited set of predetermined answers to choose from Strengths- quantitative data is easy to analyse -objective so requires little interpretation -data more likely to be relevant Limitations- lack of insight -may force them to answer in a way they wouldn't usually have
35
Likert scale questions- describe and evaluate
Typically a 5, 7 or 9 point agreement scale Type of closed question Strengths- allows researcher to investigate extent of opinion -provides easy to analyse quantitative data -objective/ requires no interpretation Limitations- scale may be subjective to participants/ each participant may interpret scale differently
36
Why might interviews be preferred over questionaires?
Participants can ask for clarification on questions they are unsure about
37
Why might questionaires be preferred over interviews?
Less researcher bias Participants are more likely to be honest Data can be collected more quickly- many questionaires can be sent out at once
38
Features of a good/valid questionaire
Includes all relevant options Only asks relevant questions Questions should be clear No leading questions
39
What is a pilot study?
A small trial version of a study Used to test effectiveness and make improvements Identifies potential issues that can be rectified before committing time and money to a full investigation