Booklet 1 Flashcards

Experimental Methods

1
Q

Independent variable

A

The variable manipulated by the researcher to monitor the impact on the dependent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Dependent variable

A

The variable measured by the researcher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Ecological validity

A

The extent to which the results can be applied to real life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Demand characteristics

A

Participants change their behaviour to present themselves in a good way or because they have guessed the aim of the research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Internal validity

A

The extent to which we can testify the IV has affected the DV due to a high level of control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Reliability

A

The consistency of a measure/finding by replicating the research and finding the same results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Validity

A

How far a test measures what it has set out to measure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Extraneous variables

A

Variables other than the IV that may affect the DV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Name the experimental methods of research

A

Natural
Field
Laboratory
Quasi

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Name the non experimental methods of research

A

Observation
Content analysis
Case study
Correlation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Describe laboratory experiments

A

Highly controlled- researcher has full control over where and how the research is conducted and who its conducted on
Researcher directly manipulates IV and precisely measures DV
Possible to randomly allocate participants to conditions to reduce participant variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Describe field experiments

A

Researcher still attempts to hold all variables constant while isolating and manipulating the IV and measuring the effect on the DV
Still possible to randomly allocate participants
Research conducted in a natural environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Describe natural experiments

A

Conducted in a participants natural environment
Independent variable is naturally occurring- outside of researcher’s control
Researcher unable to control extraneous variables or randomly allocate participants
Researcher just measures change in dependent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Describe quasi experiments

A

IV is within the person eg gender, personality type, age therefore not manipulated by researcher
Naturally occurring but concerning a person
Impossible to randomly allocate participants to conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Describe 2 strengths of laboratory experiments

A

High internal validity- researcher has high degree of control over extraneous variables and isolates independent variable to allow direct manipulation therefore the change in DV likely to be a result of change in IV establishing cause and effect
Highly replicable- researcher has high degree of control so experiment can be repeated and same results can be found again, results can be assessed for accuracy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe 2 weaknesses of laboratory experiments

A

Low ecological validity- artificial settings with artificial tasks so may not represent behaviour in real world
May be influenced by demand characteristics- participants are aware they’re being studied so may change behaviour, reducing validity of results

17
Q

Describe 2 strengths of field experiments

A

Fair degree of internal validity- researcher attempts to control extraneous variables so change in DV likely due to change in IV so can establish cause and effect
Less likely to be affected by demand characteristics- familiar environment so participants behave more naturally

18
Q

Give 2 weaknesses of field experiments

A

Ethical issues- participants may be unaware they’re part of an experiment so unable to give informed consent
Lower internal validity- harder to control extraneous variables so hard to establish causality

19
Q

Give 2 strengths of natural experiments

A

High ecological validity- natural setting where IV occurs naturally so participants less likely to show demand characteristics
Useful to investigate concepts that would be unethical to directly manipulate- IV occurs naturally so researcher isn’t directly subjecting participants to harm

20
Q

Give 2 weaknesses of natural experiments

A

Low internal validity- researcher has little control over extraneous variables so can’t be certain change in DV is due to IV
May be unethical- participants may not know they are taking part so cannot give informed consent

21
Q

Name 5 ways of controlling extraneous variables

A

Carry out a pilot study to highlight potential EVs
Standardised procedure, task, environment, instructions etc

22
Q

How do you structure a consent form?

A

Dear prospective participants
Aim of research
Details of task
Give right to withdraw
State results will be confidential and stored securely
Sign below if you agree
Sign:_____ Date:_____

23
Q

What is a confounding variable?

A

Something that varies systematically with the IV that may act as a second IV

24
Q

Describe investigator effects.

A

A researcher’s expectation may influence how the study is designed (which may influence a certain group)
Researcher’s behaviour may be different towards different groups (encouraging tone of voice, facial expressions etc) which may lead to demand characteristics
Expectations may affect how the researcher takes measurements ie being more generous for one group

25
Describe 3 ways of controlling investigator effects
Randomisation- organising participants/materials in a way free from bias eg using a computer system Standardised instructions- all participants receiving identical instructions often in written form Double blind technique- researcher and participants unaware of what conditions they are in
26
Describe a strength of quasi experiments
Often carried out under controlled conditions so replicable and high internal validity
27
Describe 2 weaknesses of quasi experiments
Can't randomly allocate participants so may be impacted by confounding variables Low internal validity- IV hasnt been directly manipulated so can't establish causality