Booklet 1 1830-1870 Background Flashcards
What was Italy like before 1830/ napoleons rule
- Naples was very poor and agricultural
- the central duchies were controlled by Austria (Tuscany and Moderna)
- the Papal States were controlled by the pope and the church
- the northern states were represented by Austrians
- Piedmont- “the house of savoy” controls Sardinia
- north was richer and more developed
- Rome had culturally and politically dominated Europe
How did Napoleon take over Italy and change it?
- France attacked Piedmont/Sardinia in 1792
- in 1796 napoleons took over the army and in 1805 he crowned himself king
- he got rid of the old states and divided Italy into 4 kingdoms in 1798
- in 1810 he spit it into 3, 1/3 Kingdom of Italy, 1/3 an annexed to France and 1/3 was kingdom of Naples. (Sicily was owned by Britain)
- The Italians suffered a lot 26,000/27,000 soldiers died
- taxes grew for the Italians (60% was paid for the army) and the church lost a lot of land, some popes were imprisoned by the French
- the M/UC benefited as they did have to join the army
- however, the peasants benefited as Napoleon brought financial advantages
- urbanisation increased, vaccinations were introduced and there was a standardised currency
After napoleons defeat how did the congress of Vienna change Italy again (1830)
- Congress of Vienna, assembly in 1814–15 that reorganized Europe after the Napoleonic Wars
*the old rulers returned to their state allied with the church and so gained power. - Ferdinand restored education
- Piedmont discouraged people to go to church
- the Jews weee forced into ghettos
- Piedmont was independent and ruled by savoy, it is thought that this was used as a buffer
- Lombardy, Vienna, Tuscany, Moderna, Parma were all under Austrian control
- Naples + Sicily was ruled by king Ferdinand
What was the congress of Vienna
Congress of Vienna, assembly in 1814–15 that reorganized Europe after the Napoleonic Wars.
What was life like in teh different states under the restored monarchs in 1830
- Tuscany and Parma progressed in education, reorganised university of Pisa and Siena and education for girls, expanded health facilities. Florence became the centre for Italian politics
- Piedmont, Papal and Sicily were all reactionary as non Nobel officers were dismissed, code Napoleon was gone, old custom barriers were introduced, church education, nobles were returned their land, zealots established a tight control over everything
- local government was in hands of priests and censorship was restored
What political groups and organisations existed in Italy form 1815
- Liberal- people should have a say in government and this was best achieved through representative assembly or parliament elected by property owners. People who wanted a constitution said people who owned property could elect leaders
- radicals- had very extreme views and were prepared to use violence to have their voice heard. They wanted social reform and fairer distribution of wealth
- nationalists- believed people of the same race, language, and culture should be United and have a nation of their own, disagreement existed about the extent of the peninsula that should be unified
- monarchists- wanted to keep their king or queen
- Austrian view of political groups- entirely negative and had no intention of allowing such dangerous ideas to spread as they could threaten to break up the Austrian empire. Metternich wouldn’t allow Italy to exist because a divided peninsula under absolute rulers was easier for Austria to divide and rule
What happened in the revolutions of 1820-1821
- the 1820 revolution began in Sicily and in Naples, against King Ferdinand I of the Two Sicilies, who was forced to make concessions and promise a constitutional monarchy.
- This success inspired Carbonari in the north of Italy to revolt too. 30 carbonari members advanced on town arellino
- Ferdinand promised to meet rebels demands and gave the vote to all men, limiting the kings power and abolished Nobel’s power
- in Sicily people were fighting for independence form Naples, riots took place in Palermo with a demand for a constitution, this resulted in release of prisoners and Napoleonic government were sent home.
- in Piedmont Revolution broke out of carbonari, uni students, army officers and liberals they declared independence from Italy and declared war on Austria but they were defeated the forces in battle of novora in 1821
Why did the 1820s revolutions fail
- too small
- too localised
- uncoordinated
- they were secret
- Austrians squashed the revolutions
- they need forge in help but didn’t have any
How serious was the threat to the Austrians form political groups and secret societies
- as they were scattered around they could influence more people in different states leading to nationalism
- as they were secret they were difficult to find so more ideas were spread
- only local/ small so Austrians could defeat them easily
- as most of these secret societies were radical ideas many people didn’t want them
What were secret societies
•small societies that concealed their memberships and locations. After 1815 they aimed to overthrow the restored monarchs and drive out the Austrians
What were the main secret societies (3)
- the carbonari- best known and active in the south, 60,000 members in Naples which was about 5% of the adult males. Also spread to the papal states and Piedmont. They were fighting to gain constitutions and more rights from the monarchs
- federati and Aldefi: mainly in the north. Federati was led by the Milanese noblemen federico confalonieri. The society favoured constitutional government but its programme was more moderate than that of the carbonari, but it was just as anti-Austrian.
- spillo Negro- in the Papal States, little is known about them other then they were anti-austrian and against the repression of the re-established papal rule. They wanted more liberal ideas.
Strengths of secret societies
- well educated
- prepared to risk their lives
- the carbonari in particular has a lot of members
Weaknesses of secret societies
- viewed as dangerous
- unprepared to work together
- little was known about spillo negro
- they never met with political leaders
What were the barriers to unification by 1830?
Social
- poverty created gaps between upper and lower classes
- different languages
- different history
- Sicily was used by traders as a port and was very multicultural.
- Sicily wants to be separate
- upper class would loose more form unification
- repressive states
What were the barriers to unification by 1830?
Economic
- Austrian empire taxes them heavily
- south was much poorer
- Lombardy was economically advanced
- north had easier trade with Europe
- the south made money through agriculture but were very behind and weren’t industrialised.
- the south didn’t have free trade in the peninsula
- trade measures and weights were economic issues
- wasn’t a standard currency
- the north’s economy and the south’s was so different at this stage that the north didn’t want to and it was almost impossible and unnecessary to include the south
What were the barriers to unification by 1830?
Political
- different legal systems
- no one wanted to go against the Austrians because they were so powerful
- no foreign help came which is what Italy needed to help them beat Austria as tehir army was to big
- northern states couldn’t converse with southern states so they weren’t aware that they all had similar views
- in Sicily they had a monarchy so would be difficult to work out who woudk rule
- different laws so changing them so suddenly would cause confusion
What were the political, social, and economic features of the Italian states by 1830?
Piedmont Sardinia
- reactionary state
- very enlightened and developed
- Turin was economically advanced with banks
- strong army
- effective established government which repealed the code Napoleon
- free open trials abolished
What were the political, social, and economic features of the Italian states by 1830?
Lombardy/Venetia
- reactionary states
- direct Austrian control in 1814
- compulsory education
- Lombardy was economically and culturally advanced. In 1815 it was the richest Italian province
- heavily taxed and conscripted and the state provided 1/4 of Austrians revenue
What were the political, social, and economic features of the Italian states by 1830?
Parma/Moderna/Tuscany
- reactionary and progressional
- Parma/Moderna: controlled by Papal States
- returned to pre Napoleonic era
- Tuscany: improved education especially girls, better health
- freedom of expression, large population, cultural towns
What were the political, social, and economic features of the Italian states by 1830?
The kingdoms of two Scillies
- reactionary state
- absolute monarchy, feudal, king Ferdinand, no say in government, oppressive
- variety of cultures, less schools
- suffered from diseases like malaria and famine due to poor harvests, very poor
What were the political, social, and economic features of the Italian states by 1830?
Papal States
- reactionary
- Austrian control, zealots established control on the government and education
- everyone was Catholic, no communication developments
- economically poor and pre industrial
- south looked for south support and north looked for north support
How did the church help the idea of unification by 1830
- the Austrians helped protect the poor in the Papal States
- 97% of Italian people were Roman Catholic so they would be unified
- everyone went to church on Sundays so priests or peasants could spread their ideas each week
How did the church hinder the idea of unification by 1830
- they punished anyone who questioned the church which would cause people to hate their leaders and so hinder unification
- the Papal States wee economically poor because of the church
- the church was conservative and didn’t want change
- zealots established tight controls on the government, education, culture and politics in the Papal States
- the church were close with Austria and Austria still had power of the state which stopped people wanting to unify with the other states, they followed the popes rule and he was an ally with Austria who wanted Italian control
- zealots attacked people who challenged the church