Bloc 3 Flashcards
Becker
Moral company (Becker)
* All the efforts made by an interest group or lobby tot hat his notions of what is moral or socially appropriate
Becomes law.
Moral entrepreneurs (Becker)
- Groups or individuals who engage in its practice
According to Joseph Gusfield, What are the three levels of constructing a social problem?
- Scientific Rhetoric
-Work to reorganize the “cognitive order”
(Reading grid that allows you to develop definitions of the situation)
- “Owners of public problems » convinced
(Protagonists who have access to political and legal bodies, who have the authority to “say” what is a problem, and who make it “their cause”)
According to Spector and Kitsuse (1977), what is a social problem
Social problem: Not an objective thing but the result of “activities Individuals or groups who make complaints or claims in connection with putative conditions.”
Related to the work of “claim-makers”: people who claim that there is a Problem
According to Best, what are the 6 steps of constructing a social problem?
- Claim-making
- Media coverage
- Reaction of the public
- Policy making
- Social problem work
- Policy outcomes
Step 1. Claim-making
“claim-makers” define a condition/situation as problematic.
Step 2. Media Coverage
Media cover the issue and the “problem” becomes widely known.
Step 3: Public Reaction
Members of the public ask for measures to be taken
Step 4: Developed Policies
Governments pass laws, or Institutions develop regulations, measures, programs
Step 5: Social Problem Work
Implementation of programs, requests for other measures to solve the problem
Step 6. Results (Policy outcomes)
Various results, do not necessarily “fix” the “Problem”, contested answer, spiral effect.
What is Moral Panic?
A mass movement based on the false or exaggerated perception that some cultural behaviour or group of people is dangerously deviant and poses a threat to society’s values and interests. Moral panics are generally fuelled by media, politicians, editors, coverage of social issues.
- Socially accredited experts pronounce their diagnoses and solutions; treatments are formalized and most often implemented”
Folk Devils By Cohen
- For Cohen, they are constructed as a threat by the media and
politicians by process of: - Symbolization: the scapegoat is presented in a way
monolithic, its appearance and identity too
simplistic, as being easy to recognize. - Exaggeration: the facts of the controversy surrounding this group are romanticized, distorted, or simply invented to
help the “moral crusade”. - Prediction: it is announced that other dangerous actions or immoralities of this group must inevitably arise if we
does not act
What are the elements of moral panic
- Concern: There must be a belief that the behavior in question may
have a negative impact on society. - Hostility: We must see hostility towards a group increase. The group becomes one
scapegoat (folk devil). There is a clear division in the discourse between “them” and “us “. - Consensus: The definition of the situation will not be accepted by everyone but it must there be a “certain consensus” on the threat posed. This is manifested by
very vocal “moral entrepreneurs” and “folk devils” and critics of
this speech that seems disorganized. - Disproportionality: The actions or measures taken are disproportionate
compared to the real threat. - Volatility: Moral panics are very volatile and tend to disappear too quickly as they appear since they are linked to media attention.
What is the nature of problems between social problems and panic moral?
Social Problem;
Issues that some members of society considers
problematic.
Moral Panic:
Issues that shock and invoke a very moral reaction
strong for certain members of society and who are often
presented in a stereotypical and hostile manner
What are the origins of perceived from the problem?
Between social problems and panic moral
Social problems:
Organization of the company and inadequate public policies
Moral Panic:
Often a publicized event that may arise from
the problematic organization of society but treated as a threat to be contained