biostatistique Flashcards
standard deviation normal distribution a 68%
SD a 1 from the mean
standard deviation normal distribution a 95%
SD a 2 from mean
standard deviation normal distribution a 99,7%
SD a 3 from the mean
example mean a 230 mg/dl pour le cholesterol and SD a 10,what’s the value for cholesterol if observations are 95%
210-250
disease with increasing prevalence and stable incidence what happened(2)
any rx which prolongs life
good quality of care
Quid of PPV(2)
positive predictive value
pobability of having the disease if the result test is positive
quid of negative predictive value
probability of having the disease if the test is negative
quid of null hypothesis
no relationship between exposure and outcome
example of null hypothesis
CRP high and colon cancer ,no relationship
what to consider when evaluating the effectiveness of new trial drug
the natural history of the disease
example drug effectiveness and drug trial(2)
effectiveness of antiviral drug and flu
no exact conclusion can be drawn becausecommon cold is a self limited disease
in hazard ration interpretation what are the 2 key factors to consider(2)
control arm
rx arm
quid of hazard ratio <1
the event will occur in the control arm
quid of hazard ratio > 1
the event will occur in the rx arm
practice of hazard ratio
the chance for an event to occur during taking a drug for instance
interpretation of hazard ration close to one
no difference for an event to occur in the 2 groups rx arm and control arm
what information is critical to successfull randomization
baseline characteristics
what an ideal randomisation
process to minimize selection biais and achieves possibility of cofounding variables
a study is done using placebo and Rx,the assignment of the rx in teh two arm is done randomly using numbers generated by computer what randomization helps to do in ths case?
to eliminate confounder
what methods are used to eliminate cofounder during analytic stage of study
stratified analysis
modeling
what methods are used to eliminate cofounder during adesign stage of study(3)
matching
restriction
randomization
clue for randomization(2)
Rx group
Placebo group
when using randomization
during clinical trials
quid of restriction
when you limit your study to one group for example one sexe is considered
problem with restriction
you cannot generalize your finding in the population
when using matching
control studies
importance in using macthing(2)
when you want to study risk factor(
exposure and outcome
practice of macthing
you will take a group with a known risk factor and another one without it and compare
quid of false negative
the test is negative but you have the disease
consequence of raising the cut off value
false negative will increase
quid of precision
measure of random error in study
how to know a study is precise
when the confidence interval is tighter
what to do to increase precision of a study
increase the sample
objectif in using confidence interval
to measeure precision of a study
hazard ratio quid
ration of an event to occur in the Rx group compared to the non Rx group(arm group)
hazard ratio less than 1
event less likely to occur in the rx group
hazard ratio more than 1
event likely to occur in the rx group
in the USMLE when hazard ration is used
to determine the complication of a rx
quid a factorial design
when a study uses different interventions with two or more different variables
use of scatter plots
to demonstrate linear and non linaear patterns
any time you see a new screening test in the USMLE think of
lead time biais
lead time biais?
apparent survival in patients to whom a screening test is applied without changing the prognosis of the disease
way to interpret strengh of association and dose response relationship from a study
risk relatif RR
quid of null value of RR if you have null value outside
1
quid of relative risk
the probability for en event to occur in the exposed group compared to the probability in the non exposed group
quid of RR>1
the event occurs more frequently in the exposed group
quid of RR< 1
the event occurs more frequently in the exposed group
what’s the best way to to compare the mean of 2 groups of subject
two sample test
during a case control of disease the oddd ration is 5.0,the scientist conclude that the relative risk is 5f higher for an habit what does that imply
it’s a rare disease
best way to compare 3 or more means
two sample Z test
all the time RR=OR what to conclude
you are dealing with a rare disease
quid of correlation coefficient
helps to tell relationship between a a risk factor and an outcome
what coefficient correclaition doesn’t not imply
causality
Math of CC
iiii
quid of NPV
proportion de personne negatif for a test reellement non malade
quid of PPV
proportion de personne positif pour un test et reellement malade
what happen to the PPV when it’s applied to a population with high incidence of a disease
PPV will increase
quid of outlier(2)
an extreme and unusual value observed in a dataset
may be caused by error or mistake