Biological Approach Flashcards
What is the difference between MRI and fMRI
~fMRI– Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, a brain scan using magnets to align particles in the body and measure the blood flow.
~MRI – Magnetic Resonance Imaging, a brain scan using magnets to align particles in the body.
Can you name any fMRI related studies
Fisher et al- the role of dopamine
Can you name any MRI related studies
~Draginski (neuroplasticity in response to juggling)
~Maguire ( brain plasticity in London black taxi drivers)
~Corkin et al (HM)
Which part of the brain is responsible for coordination?
Cerebellum
Which part of the brain is responsible for the reward system?
VTA
Explain the concept of localisation and function
The concept that different parts of the brain are responsible for individual functions. Damage to specific parts of the brain results in specific loss or change in function.
What is neuroplasticity
The ability of the brain to change its neural structures in order to adopt to change is called neuroplasticity.
How does neuroplasticity happen?
The brain is made up of Neurons- a specialised cell designed to transmit information to other nerve cells, muscle, or gland cells.
They are joined at the axon and dendrite where synapses are used to pass signals from one neuron to another.
1. long term potentiation
2. dendritic branching
3. neural network
What is pruning?
Neural pathways are severed, or weakened due to changes in understanding or not being used.
What is dendritic branching
Neurons joining to form new connections
When given a question on neuroplasticity which studies will you use
~Maguire et al (Taxi Drivers)
~Draganski- Juggling
Study: Cases et al. (1995)
Researcher(s): Cases et al.
Aim: To investigate the genetic origins of aggression by studying the effects of the MAOA gene in mice.
Method: Laboratory experiment with genetically modified mice.
Participants: Mice with a genetic knockout of the MAOA gene (MAOA-deficient mice) and a control group of normal mice.
Procedure:
Researchers genetically engineered mice that lacked the MAOA enzyme, which breaks down neurotransmitters like serotonin and dopamine.
The behavior of the genetically modified mice was compared to normal mice. They observed and recorded aggressive behaviors (biting, attacking, etc.) in various situations.
Results:
The MAOA-deficient mice exhibited increased aggression, particularly during male-male confrontations. They also showed abnormal behavior like hyper-reactivity to stimuli.
Conclusion:
Low levels of MAOA are associated with increased aggression, suggesting that genetic factors (such as the MAOA gene) can influence aggressive behavior by affecting neurotransmitter regulation.
Evaluation:
Strengths:
High control over variables (genetic manipulation and observation).
Provides insight into the biological origins of aggression, particularly the role of the MAOA gene.
Limitations:
Animal study: Findings may not generalize directly to humans (issues of external validity).
Ethical concerns: Manipulating genes in animals and inducing aggression can raise ethical questions.
Aggression is a complex behaviour influenced by multiple factors (social, environmental), so the study may oversimplify the role of genetics.
Study: McGaugh & Cahill (1995) (FBM)
Researcher(s): McGaugh & Cahill
Aim: To investigate the role of emotion on memory consolidation.
Method: Laboratory experiment
Participants: Adults, split into two groups exposed to different stories.
Procedure: Participants heard either an emotionally arousing story or a neutral story paired with images. Two weeks later, they were tested on memory recall.
Results: Participants who heard the emotional story recalled significantly more details than those who heard the neutral story.
Conclusion: Emotional arousal aids memory consolidation, likely through the release of stress hormones.
Evaluation:
Strengths: Supports the biological basis of emotional memory; strong control of variables.
Limitations: Low ecological validity as stories and images may not represent real-life emotional events.
Study: Corkin (1997)
Researcher(s): Suzanne Corkin
Aim: To analyse brain structure of the famous amnesiac patient H.M. using MRI.
Method: Case study with MRI imaging
Participants: H.M. (Henry Molaison), a patient with severe anterograde amnesia
Procedure: MRI scans of H.M.’s brain were conducted to assess the areas affected by a surgery that removed parts of the hippocampus and other regions.
Results: Corkin identified that H.M. had damage to the hippocampus, amygdala, and surrounding areas, supporting the role of the hippocampus in memory formation.
Conclusion: The hippocampus is crucial for forming new memories, specifically episodic and declarative memory.
Evaluation:
Strengths: Provides insight into brain localization of memory functions.
Limitations: Findings are specific to H.M.; may not generalize to the general population.
Study: Maguire et al. (2000)
Researcher(s): Eleanor Maguire and colleagues
Aim: To investigate whether extensive spatial navigation experience influences hippocampal volume.
Method: Quasi-experimental study with MRI imaging
Participants: London taxi drivers compared to a control group of non-taxi drivers
Procedure: MRI scans were used to compare the hippocampal volume between taxi drivers and non-drivers.
Results: Taxi drivers had a larger posterior hippocampus, suggesting a relationship between spatial memory and hippocampal volume.
Conclusion: Extensive spatial navigation experience can lead to neuroplasticity in the hippocampus.
Evaluation:
Strengths: Strong evidence for neuroplasticity; well-controlled comparison.
Limitations: Possible self-selection bias; findings may be specific to this particular skill set.