BIOL 322 Flashcards
What suspension feeders consume
- phytoplankton
- zooplankton
- bacterioplankton
- POM
suspension feeding unique
-almost entirely unique to aquatic environment
some spiders suspension feed pollen
organisms who spend entire life in the plankton
holoplankton
plankton sizes
picoplankton 0.2-2um nanoplankton 2-20um microplankton 20-200um mesoplankton 0.2-20 mm macroplankton 2-20 cm
filter feeding
a type of suspension feeding
the goal of suspension feeding
to capture and ingest very small particles from a very large volume of fluid
Suspension feeding steps
- water transport
- particle capture
- transport particles to mouth
- ingestion
organisms who spend one component of their life history in the plankton
meroplankton
Net Gain (E) =
consumed - costs
Consumed =
quality x quality
Reynolds number
- relative importance of viscous to inertial forces
- determines physical characteristics of fluid flow around object
Reynolds number =
(velocity x object size x density) / viscosity
flow vs velocity
low velocity = laminar flow
high velocity = turbulent flow
laminar flow reynolds number
less than 10
increased velocity (Re #)
= increased Re #
= inertial forces > viscous forces
= turbulence
= smaller boundary layer
boundary layer
‘coating’ of water that is not flowing
turbulent flow reynolds number
above 200,000
barnacle cirri
biramous, cetose
- appendages
- long axis = ramus
- branches = citi
ways to induce passive water flow
- Bernoulli’s principle
- Dynamic pressure
- Viscous entrainment
what is inducing passive water flow
-organisms exploiting flow of water to augment role of water flow through body
Bernoulli’s principle
inverse relationship between fluid speed and pressure
Bernoulli’s principle in the ocean
- water mass in contact with ocean floor is slowed due to drag = high pressure
- water masses above ocean floor successively faster = lower pressure
exploiting Bernoulli’s principle in the ocean
- fluids flow from high to low P
- raise body parts to lower P areas and water will naturally flow over them
sponge parts
ostia - holes in sides of body that water flows in
osculum - hole in top that water flows out
choanocytes - flagellated cells that line the interior and induce water flow
what is viscous entrainment
-water molecules are adhesive due to H-bonds
taking advantage of viscous entrainment
utilize adhesion to ‘pull’ water out of chimney
dynamic pressure
kinetic energy of a fluid
Dynamic Pressure/ Viscous entrainment example
Styela montereyensis, stalked tunicate
- elaborate long flexible stalk
- in high flow: recurved buccal siphon
- stalk bent over in high flow, water forced into opening
stalked tunicate experiment
- free to move or forced in upright position by mesh bag
- free to feed for 24hr
- clean water, catch excretions
- free to move organisms had higher excretions, fed more, therefore had more water move through body
exploit active and passive feeding
acorn barnacle
-active in low flow, rake cirri through water to reduce boundary layer
porcelain crab
-rake 3rd pair maxilliped through water
Balanus phenotypic plasticity
- log ramus length decreases linearly with water velocity
- shorter in high velocity
Advantage of short legs in high velocity (barnacle)
more robust to wave damage
Madracis mirabilis
- scleractinian colonial coral w/ branched fingers
- in low flow polyps on opposite side of flow trouble feeding
- high flow polyps on opposite side can feed (turbulence), others are flattened
how to tell that which coral polyps are feeding
- in flume with unidirectional water
- feed brine shrimp cysts (dark brown) can see them inside polyp
Spinoid marine annelid
facultative suspension feeder
- tube in sand/mud
- lay palps on ground, cilia pick up particles (deposit feeding)
- if current velocity increases, raise palps and coil
Advantage of long legs in low water velocity (barnacle)
- more surface area
- Bernoulli’s principle
Why does Spionid coil palps
- increase length of palp that is normal to flow
- larger diameter relative to straight palp, increase Re
particle flux
of particles that move past point during any period of time
Spionid experiment
- start: high particle flux, suspension feeding
- add filter, water v same
- less suspension feeders
- remove filter, more suspension feeders
what does Spionid experiment show
- they are not suspension feeding b/c of water velocity
- changing feeding mode to do particle flux
- coincides w/ water v b/c low v allows particles to settle, high entrains them
Particle Capture Mechanisms
- filtering
- scan and trap
- direct interception
- ciliary mechanisms
filter feeding
- device meant to have water flow through
- particles larger than mesh/pore size are retained
scan and trap feeding
isolate parcel of fluid containing food particle
scan and trapper
copepod
- swim on back
- detect particle
- fling open 2nd maxillae – change Re
- suck particle in
- fling maxillae shut
- expel water
direct interception
surface of capture device is adhesive
filter feeding examples
barnacle
porcelain crab
direct interception example
Daphnia
-feeding combs (setae and setules)
-surface charge adheres to small particles
Brittle Star
-sticky tube feet, mucous net extended between tube feet
Ciliary feeding
- bivalve ctenidia
- long lateral cilia pass food to food groove
reef-forming suspension feeders
- corals, oysters, mussels, tube worms
- usually sessile
- usually large aggregations
- ecosystem engineers
reef ecosystem services
- Habitat complexity
- pelago-benthic nutrient cycling
- water clarity
- Mixing of dissolved gases
habitat complexity (reefs)
- increased settlement surface
- increased biodiversity
- niche space
- hiding space
nutrient cycling (reefs)
- ingest PP
- bring E into benthos
- couple energy and nutrients btw water column and benthos
Benthic boundary layer
-benthic suspension feeders need downwelling mechanism to get particles
getting past benthic boundary layer
- flow-generated mixing
2. biomixing
flow-generated mixing
- surface irregularities generate turbulence
- highest turbulance at greater flow speed
biomixing
- exhalent jets create vortices
- most helpful at low current speed
reef restoration experiment
- often fail
- test if threshold reef height is critical determinant of self-sustaining
plankton
- small organisms (up to 10cm)
- live in water column
- cannot swim against current
example of passive suspension feeders
- hydroids
- corals
- crinoids
- brittle stars
- sea cucumbers
streamline
viscous forces keep fluid together and flowing in smooth lines
inertial forces
break fluid up into uneven streamlines
active suspension feeders, examples
- lamellibranch bivalves
- sponges
- ascidians
- bryozoans
- polychaetes
reef height and restoration effort experiment
- build experimental reef of empty shells of various heights
- “blocks” on sides
oyster reef experiment results
higher reefs have less sedimentation
-0.3-0.4m threshold for success (at this site)
reefs and sedimentation
- sedimentation reduces rugosity
- turbulance reduces sedimentation
DOM
- does not settle out of fluid over time
- very heterogeneous in distribution and compilation
- lots of organic carbon
DOM abundance
30-100 umol/kg
organic carbon in biosphere
plant biomass ca. 800x10^9
dissolved in seawater 1600x10^9
primary DOM source
phytoplankton
measuring rugosity
- drape fine link chain over
- measure length of chain needed from one side to the other
Is DOM utilized by organisms
- first proposed in 1906 (August Putter)
- measured in 1950s (Grover Stephens)
measure uptake of DOM
- high [ ] inside organism
- particles must move against steep [ ] gradient
- measure movement w/ radioisotopes (C14)
- must make sure organism taking up DOM not bacteria (add antibiotics)
HPLC
high pressure liquid chromatography
- measures very very small amounts of a product
- molecules percolate through cylinder of beads
DOM uptake
- not linear with [ ]
- saturates
- indicative of enzyme
- Na dependent co-transporter
Na dependent co-transporter
- Na continually pumped out of cell
- Na constantly diffuses back in
- co-transporter has binding sites for Na + 1 other molecule
- Na movement coupled
- depends on Na/K pump (and ATP) to create this gradient
does DOM make significant contribution to nutrition
- measure larvae uptake
- quantify E in yolk
- find larvae burn more E than available in yolk (yolk = 71%)
DOM uptake example
Parastichopus californicus
- seasonal atrophy of gut
- reduce metabolic rate in times of low nutirents
- where does E come from to rebuild gut?
- find increased isotope [ ] in respiratory tree
holobiont
host + all microorganisms present
coral reefs
- 1/4 of marine biodiversity
- mostly in nutrient poor waters
symbiont hosts
- cnidarians
- molluscs
- turbellarians
- acoels
- poriferans
- protozoans
“algae”
- unicellular photosynthetic organisms
- dinoflagellates (zooxanthellae)
- chlorophytes (zoochlorellae)
- cyanobacteria
symbiodinium
- 9 clades (A-I), subclades
- each w/ unique tolerances
- once thought to be one species
symbiont location
intracellular vacuole in gastrodermal cells = symbiosome
acquisition of symbionts
- asexual reproduction
- sexual reproduction
- horizontal transmission
sexual reproduction, symbionts
- vertical (maternal) transmission
- 15% of acquisitions
- mother places symbionts in egg
horizontal transmission, symbionts
- newly acquired by each generation
- 85% of acquisitions
symbiont host benefit
-obtain 90% of symbionts photosynthate
-promote calcification rates
-
demonstration of translocation of photosynthate to host
- sodium bicarbonate w/ radioisotope
- NaH14CO3 -> Na+ + H14CO3-
- H14CO3- -> H2O + 14CO2
- find 14C in animal tissue, animals can’t fix C
Symbiont benefit
- require carbon concentrating mechanism
- N source
carbon concentrating mechanism
host membrane-bound proton pump
why does host need carbon concentrating mechanism
- CO2 from host respiration is not enough
- CO2 is limiting in aquatic environment
- CO2 dissolves and forms bicarbonate, charged molecule can’t pass through membranes
CO2 in seawater
CO2 + H2O –> H+ + HCO3-
membrane-bound proton pump
- ATPase
- pumps H+ out
- H+ combines w/ bicarbonate to turn back into CO2
- Carbonic anhydrase (CA) catalyzes reaction
- may occur at every membrane (4)
symbiont N
- assimilate host’s ammonia
- host anthozoans import nitrate from SW (unusual)
- 3rd partner: N-fixing cyano.
truly beneficial for symbiont?
- zooxanthellae double every 3days in culture, every 70-100 days in symbiosis
- host may regulate symbionts N access
cost to host
- UV exposure
- ROS
PAR
photosynthetically active radiation
full spectrum sunlight
PAR + UVR (UVA and UVB)
UVA and UVB
UVA: 400-320nm
UVB: 320-280nm
-B more damaging
UV damage
- damages DNA, protein, lipids
- creates ROS
UV protection
- sunscreen
- antioxidants
- photoactivated DNA repair enzymes
Sunscreen
- MAA
- animals can not produce
- different types, unique max abs.
- more MAAs = broad spectrum protection
MAA
mycosporine-like amino acids -cyclohexane ring -conjugated to amino acid or amino alcohol Shikimate pathway -plants, bacteria, fungae
primary MAA
- synthesized by dinoflagellate
- short half life
- can be upregulated by UV light
- not a lot of types
secondary MAA
- modified primaries
- longer half life
- broader coverage for host and symbiont
- not up-regulated
ROS
reactive oxygen species
ROS generated by
- photochemical reactions of photosynthesis
- hyperoxia
hyperoxia
- pure oxygen damaging in excess
- electron loss = O2^- = superoxide radical
- scavenges electrons = oxidative damage
normoxia
150 mmHg
light energy pathways in organism
- photochemistry = ROS
- Fluorescence
- Heat dissipation
- Chl reaction = ROS
ROS solution
superoxide dismutase
-detoxifies ROS
detoxify ROS
O2^- + H+ – w/ superoxide dismutase –> H2O2 + O2
catlase
breakdown H2O2
2H2O2 –catalase –> 2H2O + O2
what happens to photosynthate
90% translocated to coral
-40% of that released in mucus
coral mucus
Insoluble: upwells, particle trap, concentrates particles, descends, enriched
soluble: DOM, bacteria substrate
Coral bleaching, symbiont loss hypotheses
- adaptive bleaching hypothesis
- host differential tolerance hypothesis
- response to ROS damage
coral bleaching, stresses
- thinning of ozone – increased UV
- pollutants, eutrophication
- ocean acidification
- global warming ***
DHW
degrees heating weeks
- combines increased T and duration of exposure
- number of º above average for each week
adaptive bleaching hypothesis
- expel symbiont to get a more suitable one
- presumes clade surviving in water is better adapted to stress
Chiriqui Panama corals
2 bays, one exposed to higher T variations
-switch from more of C clade to all D during ENSO and then regain some C after
why switch to D clade
- D more resistant to high T
- C more efficient
Host differential tolerance hypothesis
-corals differ in physiological capacity to withstand high T
evidence of host differential tolerance hypothesis
- fore reef vs back reef corals in Indo-Pacific
- back reef high variability, fore reef moderate variability
- no difference in C:D clade ratio
Transplanted Indo-Pacific corals
- transplanted corals adapted to their surrounding, HV lost their tolerance in MV
- evidence of acclimation
- no change in proportion of C:D
Response to ROS damage
- current hypothesis
- elevated T’s cause severe oxidative stress-
- bleaching is a collapse of the delicate balance of the partnership
- symbiont becomes toxic to host b/c host can no longer tolerate ROS