Being Stereotyped Flashcards
Stress and Health
Awareness of: Stereotypes and Prejudices —> Stress —> Negative health consequences
Stress and health Study
Experimental manipulation: Information indicating a person either is or isn’t prejudiced against ethnic minority groups
Results: Anticipating interactions with a prejudiced person led to increased emotional stress, heart rate, and blood pressure
Social Safety
- reliable social connection, inclusion, and protection
- provides an important buffer against stressful and health-imperilling effects of prejudice and stigmatization
- insufficeint social safety = primary cause of stigma-related health disparities and key target for intervention
Social identity and fitting in
Awareness of: Stereotypes and prejudices —> Concern about being perceived as one of “them” —> Changes in attitudes and actions to “fit in”
You are what you eat experiment
- In-person survey on food preferences
- Initial inquiry of “Do you speak english”
- “I AM from here” “I DO belong here”
- causing them to say an American food in order to fit in
Similar experiment (Asian-Americans)
- gave participants opportunity to choose food to rate
- then told them they had to be American to participate
- “I AM American, actually”
- more likely to order American food and ingested more calories
Stereotype threat and academic acheivement
- awareness of stereotypes of own group and concern about how own actions might reinforce that stereotypes —> disruption in performance
- e.g. African-Americans underachieve
- Women don’t do well in math as guys
Opportunities for intervention can be integrated:
- self-conscious attention to own behaviour (I’m a woman, taking this math test)
- negative thoughts and emotions (What if I reinforce these negative stereotypes?)
- physiological stress response
- ALL lead to consumption of working memory (more likely to make mistakes, take longer)
Disruption in performance is less likely to happen when
- academic task presented as non-diagnostic of ability (not a “hardcore test” that depends on math abilities)
- membership in stereotypes group is less salient (when have to record gender during math test)
- the stereotype itself is less salient
- awareness of “stereotype threat” phenomenon
The stereotype itself is less salient
- when presented as a math test: men performed better
- when presented as problem solving test: men and women equal performance
Awareness of stereotype threat phenomenon
- brief lesson on stereotype threat and then do math test: men and women equal performance
Why might learning about stereotype threat affect women’s performance?
- equipped to anticipate stereotype
- provides a way of finding the whole experience less threatening
- provides an excuse if women screw up
- opportunities for intervention
If situation primes a sense of uncertainty, they become motivated to not conform to stereotype
BUT this increased vigilance and control hijacks the same central executive processor needed to excel on complex cognitive tasks —> poorer performance
Why poorer performance when trying to avoid stereotype?
- Losing oneself in the moment
- Searching for signs of failure
- The view through threat-coloured glasses
- Never let them see you sweat
- Losing oneself in the moment
- math-identified woman become uncertain about who they are when under stereotype threat