behavioural Flashcards
what are the 3 assumptions?
we are all born into the world as a tabula rasa (blank slate)
all behaviour is learnt through conditioning
the same laws apply to human and non human animal behaviour
what is classical and operant conditioning?
classical: learning through associations
operant: learning through reinforcement
what does a tabula rasa mean?
we are born with no pre-planned or in built content
define:
conditioned stimulus
conditioned response
neutral stimulus
unconditioned stimulus
unconditioned response
a stimulus that produces a learnt response
the learnt response to a conditioned stimulus
a stimulus that produces no response
a stimulus that produces a response we have no control over
a response we have no control over
what experiments is used for classical and operant conditioning?
classical: Pavlov’s dogs (1927)
operant: Skinner’s rats (1948)
define:
positive reinforcement
negative reinforcement
punishment
rewarding something desirable in response to good behaviour
the removal of something desirable to encourage good behaviour
consequences which reduce the likelihood of undesirable behaviour repeating
apply DRAINS to this approach
Determinist
Reductionist
Has practical applications
Nomothetic
Nurture
Scientific
how is this approach deterministic? strength/weakness and why?
rewards and punishments have been provided to us by our environment beyond our control
weakness - serious repercussions of society in terms of responsibility of our behaviour
how is this approach reductionist? strength/weakness and why?
all behaviour is viewed as a product of conditioning and disregards biological influences
weakness - theories that fail to recognise that humans are incredibly complex and no one behaviour is down the the influence of one factor alone, are blinkered
how does this approach have applications? strength/weakness and why?
SD is extremely effective in the treatment of phobias. e.g McGrath et al. reported that 75% of patients with phobias responded to systematic desensitisation
strength - the approach has been of value in improving the quality of life of real individuals
how is this approach nomothetic?
strength/weakness and why?
all individuals are seen to learn their behaviour in the exact same way (conditioning)
weakness - no treatment will work for all people e.g SD is not 100% effective with all phobias
how is this approach nurture? strength/weakness and why?
behaviourism focuses exclusively on our surrounding environment as a means of shaping behaviour. doesn’t consider genetic makeup
weakness - fails to recognise that behaviour is a product of both nature and nurture
how is this approach scientific? strength/weakness and why?
study behaviour through direct observation and measurements. everything is supported by evidence
strength - makes the assumptions of this approach much harder to argue against as they are supported by evidence
what is the therapy for this approach and what does it treat?
systematic desensitisation (SD) which treats phobias
what conditioning is it based on?
classical conditioning and involves counter-conditioning
what is the aim of SD?
replace a fear response with a relaxation response
how does SD work?
client creates a fear hierarchy and works up it applying the relaxation methods that were taught beforehand by the therapist to each. it works entirely at the client’s pace
goes from in-vitro to in-vivo
what does in-vivo and in-vetro mean?
in-vivo is real life
in-vetro is visualising
what is an effectiveness strength of SD? what does this suggest?
McGrath et al. (1990) reported that it is 75% effective.
improves the quality of life
what is an effectiveness weaknesses of SD? what does this suggest?
not the symptoms/problem
Ohman et al. (1975) suggests that it’s not effective in treating phobias that have an underlying evolutionary survival component.
limited effectiveness and only treats certain phobias
what is an effectiveness weaknesses of SD? what does this suggest?
not evolutionary influences
treats the symptoms not the problem. no attempt to address any deeper psychological or emotional issues.
SD isn’t wholly effective and deeper issues may resurface
what is an ethical strength of SD? what does this suggest?
not valid consent
more ethical than other therapies like flooding. it’s conducted slowly step by step and is at the client’s pace to make sure they’re fully relaxed at each stage.
the client’s well being and mental state is cared for