Behaviorism Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Epiphenomenon

A

A secondary effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Operant conditioning

A

Learning something by reinforcement or punishment. Behavior is weakened or strengthened based on the consequences that follow them.
The probability of response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Reinforcement

A

Things like treats where you want someone to adapt a behavior. Increases the frequency of behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Punishment

A

Negative. Is often used when you do not want someone to do something. Decreases the frequency of behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Global Skinner box

A

The whole world is a Skinner box where the history of operations are known

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Pigeons

A

Animals that Skinner did a lot of research on

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Skinner box

A

Operant conditioning chamber, where the researcher can control the environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Operationalizing

A

Defining variables in precise, observable, and measurable terms to ensure that psychological research is objective, replicable, and scientifically valid. Focusing on observable behavior rather than abstract concepts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

History of operators

A

The past behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Pavlov’s dogs

A

Conditioned reflexes (bell –> food)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Dennett’s intentional stance

A

First you decide to treat the object whose behaviour is to be predicted as a rational agent; then you figure out what beliefs that agent ought to have, given its place in the world and its purpose. Then you figure out what desires it ought to have, on the same considerations, and finally you predict that this rational agent will act to further its goals in the light of its beliefs.
A little practical reasoning from the chosen set of beliefs and desires will in most instances yield a decision about what the agent ought to do; that is what you predict the agent will do.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Classical conditioning

A

Needs a reflex to work on. A neutral stimulus becomes associated with a naturally occurring stimulus, leading to the neutral stimulus eliciting a response. It involves the process of pairing two stimuli to create a learned association.
Conditional reflexes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Instrumentalist

A

Focus on predicting and control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Functional analysis of behavior

A

The external variables of which behavior is a function. Predicting and controlling behavior through independent and dependent variables. Understanding is prediction and control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Variables according to behaviorism

A

Schedules of reinforcement ⇒ inner cause ⇒ frequency of behavior
They do not look at inner cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Response

A

A onetime behavior that can be repeated. It is just a single one. The behavior controlled by the external agent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Operant

A

The property upon which reinforcement is contingent
The general case (opposite to response)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Reflexes

A

Stimulus (external agent) ⇒ Response

19
Q

Internal state

A

Skinner acknowledges that it exists but he says that it does not matter

20
Q

Cause

A

Change in an independent variable

21
Q

Effect

A

Change in dependent variable

22
Q

External agent

A

Stimulus

23
Q

Mentalism

A

Skinner’s enemies - focus on the inner causes

24
Q

Homonculus

A

The inner man (in the brain)

25
Q

Virtus dormitiva

A

Dormitive principle - A type of tautology in which an item is explained in terms of the item itself, only put in different (usually more abstract) words.

26
Q

Metacognition

A

An awareness of one’s thought processes and an understanding of the patterns behind them

27
Q

Introspection

A

The examination or observation of one’s own mental and emotional processes.

28
Q

Private mechanism

A

Cognitive control is contingent on the privileged access the subject has to their own cognitive state

29
Q

Public mechanisms

A

Adaptive cognitive control is based upon the use of publicly available information such as the perceivable difficulty of a problem or the subject’s reinforcement history with the particular stimuli

30
Q

Environmental cue association

A

Stimuli that are close together on a continuum are more difficult to discriminate than are those that are far apart

31
Q

Behavioral cue association

A

Similar to environmental but the discriminative stimuli are generated by the subject in a way that correlates with accuracy in the primary task

32
Q

Response competition

A

Simultaneous presentation of primary discrimination problem/memory test and the secondary metacognitive response option. The two behaviors are in direct competition

33
Q

Novel behavior

A

Behavior that the person would not have engaged in before while engaging in the targeted behavior.

34
Q

Positivist

A

Observations need to be intersubjective and external. Independent and dependent variables instead of cause and effect

35
Q

Independent variable (behaviorism)

A

Schedules of reinforcement

36
Q

Dependent variable (behaviorism)

A

Frequency of behavior

37
Q

Argument against intermediary variables

A

Premise 1: It is rarely possible to manipulate directly, e.g. “physiological or psychic thirst”. We can predict behaviour without it, i.e. by looking at the history of operations.
Thus: intermediary variables are not necessary for predicting and controlling behaviour

Premise 2: Suppose intermediary variables were easy to manipulate directly. That manipulation would have to be included in an explanation. That manipulation is just another external operation. Explaining in terms of intermediary variables would be explanatorily empty without explaining this external operation.
Thus: intermediary variables are not sufficient for predicting and controlling behaviour

Conclusion: Intermediary variables have no place in scientific psychology

38
Q

How to do psychology (according to behaviorism)

A

1) Observe a behaviour
2) Explain in terms of the history of operations
3) Perform further operations and predict outcomes
4) Perform those operations that lead to desired behaviour
5) Create a utopia with a technology of behaviour

39
Q

Generalizing the argument

A

Premiss 0: Intermediary variables are necessarily question-begging in psychological theories
Premiss 1: Question begging variables are not necessary to scientific psychology
Premiss 2: Question begging variables are not sufficient for scientific psychology
Premiss 3: Variables must be either necessary or sufficient to have a place in psychology
Conclusion: Intermediary variables have no place in scientific psychology

40
Q

Question-begging

A

Supporting a claim (a conclusion) with a premise that restates or presupposes the claim

41
Q

Dennett’s comparison

A

Behaviourists argument against psychology:
All theories employing mental terminology require a homunculus
The homunculus used can always have the property required by the theory
You can always come up with a mental explanation of any behaviour
Thus: Intermediary variables are necessarily question begging in psychological theories

Dennett’s argument against behaviourism:
Behaviourist theories require postulating a reinforcement schedule
The schedule can always have the property required by the behaviour
You can always come up with an external explanation of any behaviour
Thus: external variables are necessarily question-begging in any behaviourist theory

42
Q

Two chess computers

A

Behaviourist vs internalist
1) Watching a chess computer play a human
- History of operations vs. assuming rationality and intentionality
2) Two chess computers play each other
- They learn overnight by playing each other multiple times
- We do not see this and no record is kept.
3) We see them play the next morning
- Externalist: Must invoke a history of operations even though it is by definition lost
Internalist: Must invoke rationality and intentionality (being about something)

43
Q

Relevance of behaviorism today

A

Most animal studies use behaviourist methodologies to “instruct” their animals, i.e. they need to learn a task

44
Q

Metacognition

A

Knowing what you know and that you know