BCOR 102: Final Exam Flashcards
Age structure
relative number of individuals in each age class
Ways to increase r
- Reduce age at first reproduction
- Increase litter size
- Increase number of litters
- Increase survivorship of juvenile and reproductive ages
exploitation competition
population growth rates indirectly reduced through use of shared resources
interference competition
behavior or activity that reduces the uptake efficiency of another species
Hutchinson niche
n-dimensional hypervolume that defines a range of conditions for which dn/dt > 0
realized niche
effects of other species in the enivornment
character displacement
shifts in body size or morphology of a species in the presence of a competitor
ecological assortment
if species are “too close” in size or morphology on one of them to go extinct
Allopatric
living apart
sympatric
living together
Assumptions of Loka-V predation models
- no migration, age/size structure, genetic structure, time lags
- no carrying capacity for V (rV)
- P is a specialist on V population (-qP)
- P&V encounter one another randomly in a homogenous environment (Walking Dead)
- Individual predators are insatiable (no limit to a predator can eat, constant line of dV/dt = 0)
Hypothesis 1: Habitat diversity hypothesis
more habitats -> more different niches -> more species can coexist
H2: productivity hypothesis
increasing biomass and richness of species at the bottom of the food chain increases diversity at higher levels
Keystone predator (foraging strategies)
specializes on competitive dominant prey species (richness goes up)
random predator
consumes prey in proportions in which it encounters it (richness goes down)
switching predator
prefers the most common species in an assemblage (richness goes up)
rare species specialist
prefers rare species (richness goes down)
keystone species
a species whose presence or absence leads to cascading effects on diversity
trophic cascade
reciprocal changes in abundance at different levels of a food chain
H4: Niche Overlap Hypothesis (3)
a. expand resource axis
b. increase resource specialization
c. increased tolerance of overlap
Assumptions of MW model
- source pool of P mainland species with persistent populations
- Probability of colonization is inversely related to distance or isolation of island
- probability of an extinction for a population is inversely related to population size
- population size is proportional to island area
- colonizations and extinctions of different species are independent of each other (species interactions aren’t important)
evolution (general)
sustained change in the phenotype of a system through time
evolution (biological)
change in allele frequencies of a population through time (adaptation and speciation)
pleiotropy
a single gene affects more than one trait
epistasis
gene-gene interactions where the expression of one gene affect the expression of another gene
polygenic
small additive effects of many genes on one trait
HW (hardy-weinberg) assumptions
- no mutations
- no migration
- random mating
- no natural selection
- large population size
- random segregation of alleles at meiosis
positive assortative mating
more frequent mating between similar phenotypes
random mating
mate choice is independent of genotype
negative assortative mating
more frequent matings between dissimilar phenotypes
inbreeding
more frequent matings between close relatives
Autozygous alleles
2 alleles in an individual that are identical by descent from a single ancestor
allozygous alleles
2 alleles in an individual are identical by descent from 2 different ancestors
Genetic drift
changes in allele frequency due to random segregation of alleles in small population (when N < 100)
Founder effect
a population is colonized by only a few individuals –> carry a small number of alleles