BCOR 102: Exam 3 Flashcards
S-hat equation (for species rank/abundance)
S(v)obs + S(v)undetected
s(v)undetected equation
a^2 / 2b
Hypothesis 1: Habitat diversity hypothesis
more habitats -> more different niches -> more species can coexist
H2: productivity hypothesis
increasing biomass and richness of species at the bottom of the food chain increases diversity at higher levels
H3: Keystone predator hypothesis
rocky intertidal seastar stuff
keystone predator (from H3)
increases prey species diversity by preferentially eating the competitive dominant
Keystone predator (foraging strategies)
specializes on competitive dominant prey species (richness goes up)
random predator
consumes prey in proportions in which it encounters it (richness goes down)
switching predator
prefers the most common species in an assemblage (richness goes up)
rare species specialist
prefers rare species (richness goes down)
keystone species
a species whose presence or absence leads to cascading effects on diversity
trophic cascade
reciprocal changes in abundance at different levels of a food chain
H4: Niche Overlap Hypothesis (3)
a. expand resource axis
b. increase resource specialization
c. increased tolerance of overlap
Expand resource axis (H4a)
when the resounce x-axis line is stretched out, fitting more species
Expand resource axis (H4a)
when the resource x-axis line is stretched out, fitting more species
Increase resource specialization (H4b)
species specialize in specific resources, narrowing their parameters
Increased tolerance of overlap (H4c)
more overlap with other species, just tolerate it more
H5: intermediate disturbance hypothesis
coral reefs pre and post hurricane, make bell shaped curve
non-equilibrium hypothesis
a. in early years, species are good colonizers, poor space competitiors (r-selected)
b. in later years, poor colonizers, good space competitors (k-selected)
c. in the middle, both a and b species
darlington’s rule
for oceanic islands, 10x increase in island area leads to a doubling of species number
random sampling hypothesis
a. number of individuals that accumulate on an island is proportionate to island area
b. number of species detected increases as more individuals are sampled
equilibrium theory of island biogeography
MW eqilibrium model, the island stuff
immigration rate
number of “new” species colonizing island / time
extinction rate
number of island species going extinct / time
Assumptions of MW model
- source pool of P mainland species with persistent populations
- Probability of colonization is inversely related to distance or isolation of island
- probability of an extinction for a population is inversely related to population size
- population size is proportional to island area
- colonizations and extinctions of different species are independent of each other (species interactions aren’t important)
predictions of MW model
- s-hat is a stable equilibrium point
- s-hat = f(A,D) -> area and distance
- frequent extinctions + recolonizations on island
- lack of strong species interactions
evolution (general)
sustained change in the phenotype of a system through time
evolution (biological)
change in allele frequencies of a population through time (adaptation and speciation)
genotype
underlying genetic composition of individual
phenotype
physical appearance (observed traits)
gene
section of DNA on a chromosome that codes for a particular trait
alleles
one of two or more alternate states for a gene
homozygote
individual with 2 identical alleles at a gene
heterozygote
2 different alleles for a gene
dominant allele
one whose phenotype is expressed in heterozygous or homozygous individuals
recessive allele
phenotype is only expressed in homozygous individuals
discrete traits
color, hair type
continuous traits
size, mass, protein expression
pleiotropy
a single gene affects more than one trait
epistasis
gene-gene interactions where the expression of one gene affect the expression of another gene
polygenic
small additive effects of many genes on one trait
hardy-weinberg model
expected allelic + genotypic frequencies arising only from random mating
gene pool
set of all allele copies in a population
HW (hardy-weinberg) assumptions
- no mutations
- no migration
- random mating
- no natural selection
- large population size
- random segregation of alleles at meiosis
predictions of HW
- genotype frequencies will change for only 1 generation from initial values
- no further changes in genotype frequency
- HW never changes allele frequencies
s-hat equation (H5)
(PxI) / (I + E)
t-hat equation (H5)
(IxE) / (I + E)