Bail Act 2000 Flashcards

1
Q

Bail Act 2000

Under Section 7, name 2 conditions where a person is bailable as of right ?

A
  • Charged with an offence, not punishable by imprisonment

- Maximum penalty is less than 3 years, (unless Assaults child, MAF or Breaches Protection Order)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Bail Act 2000

Under Section 7, when is the person not bailable as of right ?

A

When they have been previously convicted of an offence punishable by death or imprisonment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Bail Act 2000
Under Section 7, a defendant who is NOT bailable as of right, must be released on reasonable terms and conditions … UNLESS ?

A

The court is satisfied that there is just cause for continued detention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Bail Act 2000
Under Section 8(1), when considering whether there is just cause for continued attention, what risks must the Court take into account ?

A

The risk that:

  • defendant may fail to appear; OR
  • interference with witnesses or evidence; OR
  • May offend while on bail; AND
  • Any matter that would make it unjust to detain the defendant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Bail Act 2000
Under Section 8(2), the court outlines 8 further points for considering whether there is just cause for continued attention, name them?

A
  • Nature of the offence
  • Strength of evidence and probability of conviction
  • Seriousness of punishment likely to be imposed
  • Character and past conduct/behaviour
  • History of offending on bail
  • Length of time before trial
  • Any prejudice to the defence in preparing case
  • Any other special circumstances
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Bail Act 2000
Under Section 10, if a person is charged with a specified offence, and they have a previous conviction for any specified offence, can bail be granted

A

Yes, but only after satisfying a High Court or District Court Judge that Bail is warranted … THAT on the “balance of probabilities” will not commit offences involving violence or cause danger of safety to any person (reverse burden of proof)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Bail Act 2000

Outline Section 12 (1) and (2) in relation to 17yrs +, Further Restriction on Bail

A

1.

  • charged with 3 yrs + offence
  • time of offence, bailed for 3yr + offence
  • previously sentenced prison

2.

  • charged with 3 yrs + offence
  • previously imprisoned 14+ times
  • previous convicted while on bail for offence 3yrs+
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Bail Act 2000
Under Section 12 (5) - Further Restriction on Bail, what must the defendant convince the judge (High or District Court) ?

A

Balance of Probabilities will not while on bail commit;

  • violent offence, or endanger safety of any person; OR
  • burglary or any serious property offence (means 7yrs+)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Bail Act 2000

Under Section 12, Further Restriction on Bail, what are the primary considerations ?

A

The need to protect the public AND where appropriate … need to protect victim(s) of alleged offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Bail Act 2000
Under Section 12, Further Restriction on Bail, does a sentence of imprisonment include a sentence of “Corrective Training” imposed under Criminal Justice Act 1985 or any former Act ?

A

Answer = YES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Bail Act 2000

Under Section 15, a Defendant charged or sentenced with an offence, must be released on bail if … ?

A
  • is 17yrs old
  • not previously sentenced to imprisonment

(This is still subject to other Bail Sections, 7, 9-12, 16-17A and OT arrangements if aged 17-20yrs under s.175 CPA 2011)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Bail Act 2000

Under Section 16, a defendant charged or convicted with drug dealing may be granted bail by whom ?

A

High Court or District Court judge, but not otherwise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Bail Act 2000

Under Section 21, what may a police employee do in regards to police bail for a defendant ?

A

If he considers it “prudent to do so”, may be granted bail to person arrested and charged with offence … unless other parts of Bail Act apply

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Bail Act 2000
Under Section 21(3), When determining whether “it is prudent to grant police bail” against s.49 Dom. Violence Act, the Police Employee must … ?

A

Make the need to protect the victim the “paramount consideration”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Bail Act 2000

Under Section 21A(4), The date for the attendance at court must be no later than how many days?

A

14 days from the date of the notice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Bail Act 2000
Under Section 21B(2) and (3), a Police Employee can impose additional conditions, the same as a judicial officer … but subject to what ?

A

Only applies if;

  • Court appearance date is less than seven days from the date of notice; OR
  • Court he is appearing in will be closed for 7 consecutive days +
17
Q

Bail Act 2000

Under Section 35(1), a defendant can be arrested w/w if Constable believes on RG … What ?

A
  • Def. has absconded or about to abscond to evade justice

- failed to comply with condition of bail

18
Q

Bail Act 2000
When executing a warrant to arrest for breaching bail or absconding under section 37, what must a constable have during the execution of the warrant

A
  • A copy of the warrant with them; AND
  • Must produce it on initial entry if requested; AND
  • If not in uniform produce ID
19
Q

Bail Act 2000
Case Law - R v BRYANT
What was held in relation to his appeal to have charges dismissed, being that he was “bailable as of right” and argues that he should have been released prior to more statements being taken ?

A

Police detention was lawful, judge determined the phrase “considers it prudent to do so”, imports a subjective element.

Police are to consider whether defendant can be safely released, until he becomes responsibility of the court