B1 - Nature and Effects of Obligation (1163-1178) Flashcards
Jan 24, 29 (1163-1178)
JAN 24 LECTURE
JAN 24 LECTURE
May the private complainant in an estafa case file a separate civil action to collect a sum of money during the pendency of the Estafa case?
collection for sum of money is a civil action that can be instituted independently while the estafa criminal action is pending
note
DMPI v, the Court held that separate civil actions can be reserved, waived, or instituted prior to criminal action but the court held section of rule 111 of Crim Pro, there are certain civil actions that don’t need to be reserved.
What are the independent civil actions?
Article 32, 33, 34, 2176 of the Civil Code
What makes the civil action ‘independent’?
Separate from criminal action.
- separate, as in, a whole new case and payment of docket fees
- separate, as in, not affected by the outcome of the case
does Civil Liability Ex Delicto (CLED) need reservation?
No, it automatically happens or is deemed instituted
note
Independent Civil Action IS NOT Civil Liability Ex Delicto
Instances where CLED is not deemed instituted or automatically happens?
When the offended party
- waives their right
- institutes it prior to criminal action
- reserves their right
For the same act, it can breach and violate several laws, then each violation of a law is one cause of action. What are the other laws that may be breached or violated that constituted a crime
BP 22 ~ Estafa
- both involve issuance of a check
- issuance of worthless check is a violation of BP 22
- same issuance of check may or may not constitute Estafa (315, RPC)
note
BP 22 - special penal law
315 - penal law
Scenario: Issuer of the check as payment for merchandise from a store,
[1]
check issued simultaneously with the delivery of the merchandise (i will deliver the thing, if i receive your check)
[2]
i will deliver, you can pay later and the check is issued 5 days after,
and in both situations, check bounced
what is the violation?
[1] violation of BP 22 & Estafa because there is deceit
[2] No deceit, no violation
in the case of DMPI v. CA, Estafa is highlighted what is the common element in Estafa and it’s meaning
Deceit
- committed through misrepresentation or other acts constituting deceit.
Why is it in a case of collection for sum of money a CLED does not reserve civil action?
note
criminal acts give rise to civil liability (100) but how come this criminal act is not deemed instituted or happen automatically?
There are 4 independent civil actions (32-34, 2176)
Estafa has the element of deceit which is a form of fraud found in Art 33
in Article 33 “In cases of defamation, fraud, and physical injuries a civil action for damages, ENTIRELY separate and distinct from the criminal action, may be brought by the injured party. such civil action shall proceed INDEPENDENTLY of the **criminal prosecution, and shall require only a preponderance of evidence.”
Now what if, the case now is murder “may the private complainant in an MURDER CASE file a separate civil action to for claims for damages during the pendency of the murder case? IS IT INDEPENDENT OR NOT
Article 33 – defamation, fraud, and physical injuries.
IF THE CRIME HAS AN ELEMENT OF ANY OF THESE, THEN IT IS AN INDEPENDENT CIVIL ACTION
Domestic helper borrowed 30k from her employer for 3 months and 10k each month, but the helper after receiving money tendered resignation because of a family emergency. Employer did not allow.
You are the lawyer of the yaya, what action/s can you file and whether they can be filed separately
Illegal Detention
Yes, they can be filed separately as stated in Article 32 paragraph 14 “The right to be free from involuntary servitude in any form”
Knowledge Check:
can you invoke the bill of rights against private individuals?
why are TV interviews admissible even without presence of lawyers and counsel.
No, it is applied against the State or its agents
Because that is not a custodial investigation, iow, interview not conducted by any agent of the State
What if you sue a judge for wrongfully violating your liberty, will it prosper?
Art 32 says ‘any public officer or eomployee’
No, Art. 32 further provides that the responsibilities outlined are not demandable to judges unless the acts or omissions constitute a violation to the Penal Code or other penal statute
What is vicarious liability?
Art 2180 in relation to Art 2176 prescribes the obligation imposed for the acts or omissions of those persons for whom one is responsible for
Taxi driver, judge awards on the ex delicto awards 200k, in quasi-delict 300k is awarded by judge.
Can the judge award 300k when the criminal case of reckless imprudence there’s an award for 200k
Yes, what is prohibited is double recovery. That’s why they don’t claim it immediately and wait for the other case to finish
What is/are the effects of a judgment of acquittal in the civil aspect of a criminal case?
effects of a judgment of acquittal in the civl aspect of a criminal case
CLED
Hun Hyung Park v. Eung Won Choi
RULE: it does not necessarily the extinction of its civil action.
FINAL M1
FINAL M1
knowledge check: what is the effect of demurrer of evidence
ground: insufficiency of evidence
ground criminal: “” “” beyond reasonable doubt
if demur to evidence is filed, w/ loC, there is reservation to present evidece in case the demurrer is denied.
adjudication of the merits - acquital if granted ang demur of evidence (you cannot appeal an acquital)
in a crim case, a demur to evidence had been filed on the ground of insufficiency of evidence
u r the judge, u think there is bassi to grant the demur to evidence,
will you / will you not make a judgment when granting the demur to evidence
in case of hun hyung park. the case was remanded even the criminal action was acquitted
no notice of dishonor, so acquitted
ANSWER
according to hyun hung park & dayap, the judge handling the case and where demur to evidence is filed. is required to make a finding whether or not the act/omission did NOT exist.
‘wherefore the demur of evidence is granted and the accused is hereby acquitted
on this basis, the court shceudules a hearing for the reception of evidence insoffar as the civil aspect is concerned.
(preponderance of evidence)
[3]
between the parties to the case (applicable to civil cases) who are making claims, who among them was able to establish the claim better than the other. Involves weighing of evidence
ACUITAL prohibits appeal, what then the state do if there is basis?
res judicata (civil)
double jeopardy (criminal)
under rule 65 it would be certiorari.
on the civil aspect, you can appeal