Automatism Flashcards

1
Q

EXTERNALLY

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

affected

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Automatism - How to Apply

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Can be used for ALL

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

crimes

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

I- D may be able to argue the defence of Automatism

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

D- Lord Denning in Bratty

A

defined automatism as ‘an act done by the muscles without any control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

of the mind’. Automatism is caused by EXTERNALLY affected conditions.

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Examples of automatism:

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Reacting to swarm of bees/spasm/reflex/sneezing (Hill v Baxter)

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Diabetes - hypoglycaemia (Low blood sugar) (Quick)

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

• Concussion - from a blow to the head

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Hypnotism

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

• Effects of medication such as anaesthetic

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

A-APPLY to the scenario

17
Q

E- Stage 1: D must have lost FULL CONTROL of their actions. This means the D did the actus reus of

18
Q

the crime INVOLUNTARILY (Broome v Perkins)

19
Q

A- APPLY to the scenario

20
Q

SIDE RULE: Self- induced automatism- If the D was aware that their actions or omission would result

21
Q

in an automatic state (Bailey)

22
Q

The defence works differently depending on the TYPE OF OFFENCE the D has committed:

23
Q

• The defence can be used for specific intent crimes (as the D cannot form the intention as

24
Q

they are not in control)

25
• The defence cannot be used for basic intent crimes as the fact the D has got into a self-
26
induced automatic state is evidence of recklessness and the crime will be complete!
27
A- APPLY if relevant
28
E- Stage 2: The D must have NO MENS REA for the crime
29
A- APPLY to the scenario
30
Conclude - Will the D be successful in arguing this defence?