AUTOMATISM Flashcards

1
Q

What is the full defence of automatism?

A

a full defence of (non insane) automatism where there is an involuntary action, a mental capacity defence.

The burden of proving automatism is on the defence, who must prove it on the balance of probabilities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How was automatism defined in Bratty v A-G for Northern Ireland?

A

‘an act done by the muscles without any control by the mind, such as:
spasm

reflex action

a convulsion, not conscious of what he is doing, suffering from concussion.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did AGs Ref No 2 of 1992 state about automatism?

A

D must have lost the ability to control their actions rather than having impaired control.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is non-insane automatism?

A

Non-insane automatism requires an external cause, where the actus reus is not voluntary due to an external cause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are some examples of external causes for automatism listed in BRATTY?

A

plus sneezing

hypnotism

a blow to the head

attack by a swarm of bees

post-traumatic stress disorder (R v T).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How does being diabetic relate to automatism as in QUICK?

A

Being diabetic, but not eating properly, is an external cause and is considered automatism, not insanity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is self-induced automatism as set out in BAILEY?

A

Self-induced automatism occurs when the defendant’s conduct brings on an automatic state and applies differently to offences of specific and basic intent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How does self-induced automatism apply to specific intent offences?

A

For specific intent offences, such as murder and theft, self-induced automatism can be a defence, even if the defendant knows of the risk of bringing on an automatic state.

BAILEY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How does self-induced automatism apply to basic intent offences?

A

For basic intent offences, self-induced automatism cannot be a defence if the defendant knows of the risk of bringing on an automatic state, as this is considered recklessness.

BAILEY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is an example of self-induced automatism in a basic intent crime?

A

D being advised by his doctor not to drink alcohol when prescribed medication, and he caused ABH to V while in a self-induced automatic state, knowing the risk, he cannot use automatism as a defence COLEY

but can be a defence if they did not know the risk - HARDIE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly