ASSAULT Flashcards

1
Q

What is the legal definition of common assault under section 39 of the criminal justice act 1988? And case?

A

an intentional or reckless act which causes a person to apprehend the infliction of unlawful force~(Nelson)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What constitutes the Actus Reus of assault?

A

an act causing the apprehension of the infliction of immediate unlawful force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are some acts that can constitute the actus reus including cases

A

Act or gesture~Logdon

Words~Constanza

silent phone calls or stalking~Ireland/Burstow

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did Tuberville v Savage/ Light establish?

A

Words may negate what otherwise might be assault

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what did Lamb establish?

A

there must be fear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did Dume establish?

A

fear may be caused indirectly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How did Smith v Woking define the apprehension in assault

A

the apprehension must be of IMMEDIATE unlawful force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the mens rea of assault

A

intention or recklessness as to causing the apprehension of immediate unlawful force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How might the mens rea be committed?

A

Specific/direct intention ~Mohan

Recklessness~Cunningham

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the principle of transferred malice?

A

a crime intended for one person falls onto another by accident(Latimer/Mitchell)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does the principle of transferred malice state?

A

only similar crimes can be transferred
(Pembliton)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is meant by joint enterprise?

A

it doesn’t matter that d was not the one who actually injured v. all that matters is that d intended to hurt x,x intended to hurt d and in fighting back with d, v was injured
(Gnango)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is meant by the coincidence rule?

A

the actus reus and mens rea must coincide at least once as in Fagan v MPC and Thebo Meli(series of events)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly