AUD - Ethics, Professional Responsibilities, and General Principles Flashcards
6 key principles of the Code of Professional Conduct
- Responsibilities principle
- Public Interest principle
- Integrity principle
- Objectivity and Independence principle
- Due care principle
- Scope and nature services principle
Responsibilities principle
AICPA members should exercise sensitive professional and moral judgment in all their activities
This principle imposes a continuing responsibility on members to cooperate w/each other to:
- improve the art of accounting
- Maintain the public’s confidence
- Carry out the profession’s special responsibilities for self-governance
Public Interest principle
Members should accept the obligation act in a way that will
- Serve public interest
- Honor the public trust
- Demonstrate a commitment to professionalism
Integrity principle
Perform all professional responsibilities w/the highest sense of integrity
Objectivity and Independence principle
Maintain objectivity and be free of conflicts of interest in discharging professional responsibilities
Due care principle
A member should
- Observe the profession’s technical and ethical standards
- Strive continually to improve competence (i.e. continued professional education)
- Perform professional obligations to the best of your ability
Scope and nature of services principle
A member in public practice should observe the Principles of the Code of Professional Conduct in determining the scope and nature of services to be provided
At the minimum, members should:
- Practice in firms that have good internal quality control procedures
- Use their individual judgment to determine whether the scope and nature of services provided to an audit client would create a conflict of interest
- Individually assess whether a contemplated activity is consistent w/their role as professionals
3 main steps to applying the Conceptual Framework (MIPPs)
- Identify threats
- Evaluate the significance of the threats
- Identify and apply safeguards
Sometimes, the Code of Professional Conduct rules and interpretations don’t provide a clear answer to a particular situation -> in these instances, members should always apply the threats-and-safeguards Conceptual Framework
7 broad categories of threats
- Adverse interest threats
- Advocacy threats
- Familiarity threats
- Mgmt participation threats
- Self-interest threats
- Self-review threats
- Undue influence threats
Adverse interest threats
Examples:
- Client sues/threatens to sue the firm
Advocacy threats
Examples:
- Member provides forensic accounting services to client in lawsuit w/3rd party
- Firm acts as investment advisor, underwriter, promotor, or registered agent for a client
Familiarity threats
Examples:
- Member’s spouse or other relatives or close friend is employed by the client
- Former firm partner joins client in a key position
Management participation threats
Examples:
- Member takes on the role of client management
Self-interest threats
Examples:
- Member has a financial interest in a client that may be affected by outcome of professional services the firm is providing
- Firm relies excessively on revenue from single client
Self-review threats
Examples:
- Member relies on work product of own firm
- Member does client’s bookkeeping
- Partner in firm was an officer or director of client
Undue influence threats
Examples:
- Client threatens to fire firm or to w/hold future business unless firm accedes to client’s wishes
- Client’s major shareholders threatens to withdraw/terminate a professional service unless the member reaches desired conclusion
3 kinds of safeguards exist
- Safeguards created by profession, legislation, or regulation (e.g. professional standards and threat of disciple; license requirements; ethics education and training requirements)
- Safeguards implemented by the client (e.g knowledgeable/experienced managers, appropriate ethics policies or governance structures etc.)
- Safeguards implemented by the firm (e.g. strong leadership that emphasizes compliance, effective internal disciplinary system etc)
A covered member who owns less than 5% of a diversified mutual fund has an…
immaterial and indirect interest in the underlying securities and therefore independence is not impaired.
In evaluating possible conflicts of interest, members should ask:
Would a reasonable and informed third party conclude that a conflict exists?
2 main types of conflicts
- Between interests of 2 clients
- Between interests of client on one hand and firm and/or its members on the other
If an actual conflict is identified by any member…
engagements should be refused or terminated if risk violation is unacceptably high
Objectivity is threatened when a member serves as a
client entity’s director
At best, it is preferable to serve as a mere consultant to a client’s board
Objectivity and integrity are threatened if the client (including its officers, directors, and 10% shareholders)…
give gifts or entertainment to the firm or its members (or vice versa)
If members have a disagreement w/a superior over how to record potential earnings (or some other issue), the member is not…
supposed to simply do what the superior wants and subordinate their judgment
In an event of conflict, evaluate whether…
the threat is at an unacceptable level, which occurs if the position taken would result in a material misrepresentation or legal violation.
If the threat is not significant, then nothing further needs to be done
If, after discussion w/people up the chain, the member is still worried that the right thing isn’t going to be done, in no particular order, invoke the following safeguards:
- Determine whether the organization’s policies and procedures have any additional requirements for reporting differences of opinion
- Determine whether there is a duty to report to external authorities
- Consult legal counsel
- Fully document the situation