AUD 4 - Audit Evidence Flashcards
AUD Evid gathered when performing
- RA procedures
- TOCs
- Subst. procedures
- Other aud procedures
- prev. auds, firm’s QC for cilent accep/continuance
Passkey - Hierarchy of aud evid from most reliable to least: AEIO
Aud direct personal knowledge/observation
Ext evid
Int evid
Oral evid
What is the purpose for using A/Ps during each of the planning, as subst. procedes, and the final review stages of the audit?
Planning = u.standing of ent/environ (Rsk meas for possible prob areas)
Subst. test - obtain aud evid ab mgt assert related to acct bal/trans
Final review = final review of overall reas. of acct bals
What are the factors that affect the decision to use A/Ps as substantive test is based on what?
- Nature of assertion being tested (when potential MMS arent apparent from data or its not available)
- plausible / predictability of data relationship
- availability, reliability of data used and
- precision of data used to develop the expectation
Which assertion and which direction? =
To determine whether transactions have been recorded
Completeness
Go from source documents to financial statements
AR confirms are required per GAAS except when?
- receivables are immaterial
- confirm w/be ineffective
- IR and CR are very low and evid provided by other procedures is sufficient to reduce AR to low level.
Related parties may include:
Entity affiliates, principal owners, management, and members of their immediate families
For RPT audit objectives, the aud s/obtain an understanding of RPTs sufficient to:
- Recognize fraud risk factors relating to RPTs
- Conclude if FS are fairly presented in terms of RPTs
- Obtain SAAE about if RPTs have been ID’d, accounted for, and disclosed.
The auditor s/remain alert for which items relating to RPTs which may be indicative of a RPTransaction?
- Compensating balance arrangements
- Loan guarantees
- Unusual, nonrecurring trans near YE
- Trans based on terms that differ sig. from market terms
- Nonmonetary exchanges
When the aud IDs sig. RPTs outside the normal course of the entity’s business, the aud s/:
- Inspect contracts agreements for bus. rationale of trans that may indicated fraud, terms of the trans match mgt explanation, trans have been approp. acct for/disclosed.
- Obtain aud evid that trans h/been approp approved
If aud ID RPT that mgt hasn’t previously id’d or disclosed to the aud, the auditor should:
- communicate info to members of engagement team
- request mgt to ID all trans w/newly ID’d RParties
- Inquire why the entity’s controls failed to ID and disclose this RParty
- Perform approp. subst. procedes
- Reconsider risk that other RPs or RPTs might not have been ID’d
- Eval audit implications if mgt disclosure appears intentional
Why are estimates used?
Because either data about past events cannot be accumulated in a timely or cost-effective manner, or because measurement of some accounts is dependent upon the outcome of future events.
Under PCAOB, when auditor determines that amount of actg estimate included in the FS is unreasonable or was not determined per fwork, then the aud should:
Treat as a misstatement the difference between the recorded estimate and the best estimate supported by the audit evidence. and eval whether indication of mgt bias.
Things to look for when auditing fair values
- Consistent method w/prior period
- Past track record of estimates is accurate
- Justify any changes in approach
- Approp. in relation to industry
What are the two 3 levels/ways FV is determined
- Market value identical
- market value similar level 2
- estimates/valuations when market value not available = level 3 (DCF)
Things auditor s/do as responsibilities relating to FV:
a. ustand ent’s procedess for detmining FV meas/discl.
b. understand relev. controls (ARC)
c. asses RMM of FV measurements
d. eval conformity w/GAAP
e. consid need for specialist
f. test FM meas/disc.
g. eval if FV discl. conform w/GAAP
h. eval suffic/competency/consist. of evid obtained w/respect to FV meas/discl
i. obtain relev. mgt reps
j. communicate reev. matter to govnance
Under GAAP, when must contingent liabilities be accrued and disclosed?
When contingent liabilities are PROBABLE AND CAN BE REASONABLY ESTIMATED
For acutal or potential litigation/claims/assessments, aud s/obtain aud evid relev. to:
- Period in which underlying cause for legal action occurred
- degree of probability of an unfavorable outcome
- amount or range of potential loss.
What is the substantial attention limitation concerning letters to lawyers about pending litigations etc.
lawyer can limit replies to matters that they have given substantial attention to only, and c/only be limited to material matter if agreement reached with auditor about materiality
A refusal to respond by a client’s lawyer would be between which to outcomes in the auditor report?
Qualified or DOO
This is when the lawyer has devoted substantial attention to litigation matters. Its a scope limitation which makes it where the aud cant give an unmod opinion.
Refusal to permit inquiry to lawyer would be between which two audit opinions?
DOO or withdraw
What does mgt include about the Pending or threatening litigation within the letter of inquiry to lawyer?
- nature of litigation
- progress of case to date
- how mgt is responding or intends to respond to litigation
- evaluation of likelihood of unfavorable outcome w/an estimate of potential loss if that’s possible
PCAOB stds state the aud’s evaluation of audit results s/include eval of what?
- The restults of A/Ps performed during overall stage
- MMS found during audit, including uncorrect MMS
- Qual. aspects of company acctg practices
- Conditions ID’d during the audit that relate to fraud risk.
- The presentation of the FS incl. disclosures
- The sufficiency/approp. of audit evidence obtained.
What factors do the PCAOB state s/be considered when evaluating whether FS are free of MMS?
- Form of the arrangement
- content of the FS and notes
3. Terminology used
4. amt of detail given
5. classification of items in the FS
6. the basis of amounts set forth