attraction and the dating market Flashcards

1
Q

social exchange theory

A

seek the most fulfilling partners that will have us - those that will maximize rewards while minimizing coasts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

proximity

A

closeness/nearness
- Basic, powerful factor that drives liking
More likely to meet, get to know, and form a relationship with someone you see regularly where you live, work, etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

westgate housing study

A
  • More likely to be friends with people next door to you than people 2 doors down, 3 doors down, 4 doors down, etc
    Researchers also found that people living next to stairwells made more friends with people upstairs - also - people living next to high traffic areas and or people who had windows facing the courtyard made more friends
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

moreland and beach, 1992

A
  • Confederate attended class 0,5,10, or 15 times
    The more often the confederate attended the class, the more positively she was rate (by students seeing her photo)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what are the mechanisms behind the westgate housing study

A

· We have an increased opportunity to interact with people who live close to us
We tend to like things more after we have been repeatedly exposed to them and they become more familiar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

perceptual fluency explanation

A

easier to process info about familiar stimuli - pleasant feelings associated with more fluent processing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

classical conditioning explanation

A

Encounters with novel stimuli put us on our guard, but once we realize the stimuli is nonthreatening we feel safe around it, rendering it more pleasant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

predictors of attraction

A

· Proximity/familiarity
· Physical attractiveness/other personal characteristics
· Similarity
· Reciprocity
We are attracted to people whose presence is rewarding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

why is proximity such an important factor in attraction

A

more likely to meet, get to know and form a relationship with people we see more often
“friends aren’t necessarily the people you like best, they are merely the people who get there first”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

functional distance

A

likelihood of coming into contact with other people due to location or features of architectural design - more opportunity to interact with people close to us

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

mere exposure

A

we tend to like things after we have been repeatedly exposed to them and they become familiar (doesn’t work for things you initially dislike)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

physical appearance preference differences

A
  • People have idiosyncratic preferences
    Certain beauty standards differ across time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

physical appearance preference consensus

A
  • Evident across cultural groups
    • Newborns agree
      = degree of innateness

Women: cross cultural pref for:
- Baby face
- Large eyes
- Small nose
- Small chin
- Full lips
- Some signs of maturity:
- High prominent cheekbones
- Thick hair

Less cultural for men:
- Wide smile
- Broad jaw and forehead
“softer” features nice too

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

averageness effect

A

Faces that are “average” are seen as more attractive - don’t like features that are too extreme

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

facial symmetry

A

bilateral (two sided) symmetry contributes to attractiveness - also true of other species

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

perceptual fluency vs evolutionary explanation for facial symmetry

A

perceptual fluency explanation: average and more symmetrical faces are easier to process

Evolutionary explanation: indicators of reproductive fitness
- Produced asymmetry could be indicative of issues during prenatal development
Monkey studies shows that declines in health is associated with declines in facial symmetry

17
Q

minimal parent investment

A

least amount of time, and resources that a parents must expend to produce offspring

18
Q

asymmetry in parental investment

A

Males: minimal investment of time and resources
Females: greater investment of time and resources
(eggs are biologically more costly) pregnancy sucks

Male adaptive strategy: like females possessing indicators of fertility (cuz reproductive success is primarily limited by availability of fertile mates)

Female adaptive strategy: have to invest more, so more selective- choose mates based on ability to privde

19
Q

structureal powerlessness and gender role socialization

A

Critique of female/male adaptive strategies: based on social factors rather than innate factors
- Women find high status men attractive because they have less access to status and resources
In cultures where there is greater gender equality, women place less importance on a man’s status and resources

20
Q

necessity of luxury study (2002)

A

When men and women’s choices are constrained they prioritize different characteristics in mates:
Women: income, intelligence, social status, kindness
Men: physical attractiveness, intelligence, kindness

21
Q

stated vs actual preference study (1989)

A

Sprecher
-despite what people said in a study the actual largest predictor for both men and women’s attraction ratings was physical attractiveness

22
Q

eastiwick et al, 2014

A

Meta analysis of 97 studies involving romantic evaluations of a partner - found that evaluations were generally more positive for more attractive people and people with a higher earning potential - didn’t change for men or women

23
Q

short term vs long term mating strategies

A

People change their mating strategies depending on the conditions
In short term relationships, both genders tend to prioritize attractiveness - sex differences in terms of prioritization become more evident in long term relationships

24
Q

hormones and mate pref

A

Hypothesis that women show a preference for more masculine traits during the high fertility ovulatory phase of their menstrual cycle and a preference for more feminine faces at other stages in the cycle
- This is most pronounced for women assessing men’s attractiveness for hypothetical, short term relationships
- However, these studies are highly critiqued - tend to be small, use self report for menstrual cycle data, mixed findings
However, there is evidence that ovulatory phase increases women’s sexual motivation more broadly

25
Q

what is beautiful is good bias

A

Tend to assume that physically attractive people possess other desirable qualities - comes from cultural stereotypes

26
Q

motivated cognition: what is beautiful is good

A
  • Targets attractiveness
    • Desire to bond w target bc beauty is rewarding
      Perceived positive interpersonal attributes
27
Q

snyder tanke and berscheid, 1977

A

When ps beleived that the person they were talking on the phone w was attractive, they formed more positive impressions of them, behaved more positively towards them, and elicited more positive behaviour from them

28
Q

little et al, 2006

A
  • Found that traits like warmness, easygoing, responsible, were more highly desired on average than others
    Also individuality variability in desired traits - but some traits varied more than others (ex. Warmth didn’t vary very much, but competitiveness did)
29
Q

similarity and attraction

A
  • Predicts attraction for people we don’t know
    • Link between similarity and attraction seems to be stronger for attitudes/values and some demographic characteristics than for personality
      ○ Similarity between personalities only accounts for a small variation in satisfaction
      Desirable personality traits are more important than matching - bad to similar on unappealing traits
30
Q

perceptions of similarity

A

may be more important for liking than objective similarity
- Discovering dissimilarities takes time
- Pursue partners that represent our ideal selves
Dissimilarity may decrease over time

31
Q

complementarity

A
  • Little support for the idea that people are attracted to people who possess the qualities they lack
    ○ Ex. Introverts aren’t more attracted to extroverts
    ○ Members of eagalitarian couples tend to be happier than traditional couples - higher satisfaction in gay and lesbian couples
32
Q

individual construals

A

We have different ideas of what a trait means
- Ex. No gender dif in pref for a partner with a sense of humour, but men don’t rate funny women more highly
Bressler, martin, balshine, 2006 - men like women who laugh at their jokes; women like men who make them laugh

33
Q

reciprocity

A

We like people more if we know they like us

Aronson and Linder, 1965
Ps who overheard a positive evaluation from a confederate reported more liking for the confederate

34
Q

rewards of belonging - hsu et al 2014

A

evolutionary perspective
Could explain reciprocity
Hsu et al, 2014:
Participants told that a desirable potential partner likes them showed increased activation of a system of receptors that mediate rewarding effects of opioid drugs like heroin - stronger the activation, the more desire to interact

35
Q

selectivity in hsu et al

A

In Hsu’s study ps had the highest liking when a confederates evaluation went from negative to positive - although confederates were rated more positive in consistent positive condition
We want to feel like we are liked specificallypredi