Attitudes towards imperialism 1890-1914 Flashcards
The land of hope and glory by A.C Benson
- This was a patriotic song written in 1902
- It suggests a desire for the already large empire to expand even further
- Shows that the British feel they are allowing freedom to their colonies
- Describes the empire as victorious
- Speaks of the empire in a very positive way using words such as “brightness”
Views about attitudes to empire
- The British press were very happy to report everything no matter whether it was a triumph or a setback
- The expansion of empire contributed to a change in how Britain viewed the outside world, in particular the new people and races brought under British rule
- All manner of stereotypes and judgements were blithely made towards these new races
- Anyone involved in empire became national heroes, mainly as a result of the press
- People loved reading imperial stories in the popular press
- There were rapidly evolving forms of racism
Support for empire
Conservative, liberals, and labour
- It was widely supported at all levels of society with varying degrees of ardour and the public displays of support for empire which greeted the second Anglo-Boer war in 1899 and helped the conservatives win an impressive victory in the 1900 “Khaki election”
- The main political parties had different conceptions of empire, however
- The liberals looked beyond the conservative support for good government and white rule for its own sake
- They aimed at the education and improvement of the colonies and their people, with the objective of ultimate self-rule
- Nevertheless, even they were reluctant to bring an end to empire
- Both the liberals and the growing labour party at the beginning of the 20th century generally preferred freedom through empire rather than freedom from empire
- The real imperialists were mostly conservatives and on the radical right of the party
- During the years of conservative ascendency between 1895 and 1905, the supporters of the prime minister, Lord Salisbury, embraced the imperialist cause
- They argued in favour of the creation of a stronger and more closely united empire
- This not only meant support for territorial expansion but also support for schemes that would bind the empire together in trade and government
- It was believed that the correct policies could benefit British society and turn the empire into an economic superpower
Support for Empire
Moral reasons
- The empire was sometimes justified on moral grounds as a “responsibility”, even a burden that God had placed on the British in order to bring stability and order to the world
- Salisbury was an imperialist and believed European, preferably British, rule to be indispensable for the advancement of other peoples he believed to be less developed
- he had no hesitation in imposing this rule by force, as he did in the Sudan from 1896 to 1899
Support for Empire
High imperialist ideas
- the most fervent imperialists viewed the Empire as a sort of racial duty
- Lord Curzon proclaimed, “there has never been anything so great in the world’s history than the British empire, so great an instrument for the good of humanity”
- Lord Alfred Milner argued that every white man of British birth should feel equally at home in every state of the empire
- These high imperialists wanted a stronger empire, but an empire ruled by white people
- They believed that service in the colonies made men stronger
- This attitude relegated non-white peoples of the empire to the ranks of subjects (citizens with rights but not capable of controlling their own destinies)
- Joseph Chamberlain, the colonial secretary, was another high imperialist
- He believed that there was a “national crisis” (because of the industrial and military of other European powers) which only the empire could solve
- A reorganised empire would enable industrial recovery and employment whilst generating wealth to fund social reforms such as pensions and strengthen the moral fibre of the British people
- He believed in educating the public about the values of empire as he saw its promised benefits as a way of winning the loyalty of the working class
- Chamberlain tried to forward the imperialists’ desires for a union between Britain and the colonies of settlement for the purpose of defence and trade, but his ideas proved too unrealistic to win widespread support
Support for the Empire
Economic
- Most imperialists argued for the economic benefits of empire
- Some (including chamberlain) sought “colonial development” beyond the Dominions and India and favoured the policy of imperial preference (Tariff reform)
- Others, such as Lord Meath, a diplomat, spoke in more social terms and argued that state-organised emigration and colonisation were essential to check the expansion of British sites and simultaneously strengthen the empire
- Pro-imperial ideas among the political elite tended to be both paternalistic and mechanistic
Support for the Empire
Societies and organisations
- Many imperial activists were members of societies like the Royal Colonial Institute, founded in 1870 to provide a meeting place for those interested in colonial and Indian affairs
- Such societies proliferated in the early 20th century
- The Victoria league, founded in 1901, was a non-political organisation founded by women to promote a closer union between different parts of the then British empire through hospitality, fundraising, friendship, and education
- The Round Table movement was founded in 1909 on an idea of Lord Milner, to promote a closer union between Britain and its self-governing colonies and in 1910 and 1911, Round Table groups were formed in South Africa, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada
- Another pro-imperialist group was the Empire Day movement, which followed the lead of Lord Meath in 1896, although Empire Day was not celebrated until 1902 and only officially recognised by parliament in 1916
- The idea of a day of festivities was intended to reinforce imperial identity and celebrate the image of a motherly Queen Victoria, Empress of India
- The movement was part of the imperialists’ drive to educate the British public about the empire
- Journalists, such as Leopold Amery, also helped represent certain ideals of the Empire to British people as they emphasised the “imperial family” and propagating imperialist values with little reference to the realities of colonial rule
- Although many people celebrated Empire Day, this may not actually show support for empire as they may have just participated as a chance to socialise and enjoy the luxury if a day off work
Challenges and criticisms of empire
Why ardent imperialists failed to win much support in the years up to 1914
- Most Britons were complacent with assuming that they were destined to rule the world
- Most Britons believed that the glories of the British way of life were generously bestowed upon the grateful millions
- However, others disagreed and the period of 1880 to 1920 was marked by considerable socialist antagonism towards imperial expansion
- This was balanced by the desire to improve the colonies rather than exploit them
- As popularity of the empire grew during the Boer war, a substantial number of socialists grudgingly agreed to accept imperialism whilst other socialists attempted to promote a new brand of imperialism which was a cooperative commonwealth model rather than the exploitive capitalist model
Reasons for criticism of the empire
Imperial expansion took place in order to benefit the rich
- One of the strongest critics of empire was John A Hobson, an economist who wrote “imperialism” in 1902
- His view, catalysed by the Second Anglo-Boer war, was that imperial expansion had been driven by a search for new markets and new opportunities for the rich capitalists of Britain to make profits through investment
- Extremely anti-Semitic in his views, Hobson believed that a small political clique of Jewish financers made use of their supposed political influence, elite connections, and press conspiracy to shape imperial policy to benefit men, “most of whom are foreigners by origin, whose trade is finance, and whose trade interests are not chiefly British”
- His racist view was that the Second Anglo-Boer war was fought to secure the gold resources of South Africa for those he called “Jew-Imperialist” entrepreneurs and mining interests
- Therefore, he concluded, imperial expansion was a capitalist plot
- Hobson’s views did not signal the total rejection of empire, but they did provoke debate and fed into socialist anti-imperialism, although they had little immediate impact on policies
Reasons for criticism of the empire
The conduct of war
- Other critics of empire emerged in the aftermath of the second Anglo-Boer war, although initial concerns were more to do with the conduct of war than a direct challenge to the concept of empire
- Reports from the welfare campaigner Emily Hobhouse, which led to a government enquiry into the conditions of the British concentration camps during the Second Anglo-Boers war, helped decrease the powerful status of imperialism and its supposed civilising mission
Other figures to challenge the imperialist ideal
- Wilfrid Scawen Blunt (1840-1922) a diplomat and poet who, in imitation of the pro-imperialist poet Rudyard Kipling, wrote the line in 1899 “the white man’s burden. The Lord is the burden of his cash”
- Herbert Spencer (1820-1903), an influential philosopher who criticised the Victorian enthusiasm for colonial acquisitions of colonies, but also created the term “survival of the fittest” which was used to support Social Darwinism
- Frederic Harrison (1831-1923), a radical left-wing lawyer and historian who believed imperialism to be unethical
- William Digby (1849-1904) a writer and propagandist who had served in India and set up the Indian political and General Agency in London in order to raise awareness about Indian grievances in the British parliament and press in 1888
- Walter Crane (1845-1915), an arts and crafts designer, children’s book writer and socialist who used his design skills to produce anti-war illustrations in order to encourage those on the left to embrace anti-imperialism
Conclusions of anti-imperialism
- However, for the most part, the voice of the anti-imperialists was hidden beneath a broad swathe of imperial support, if not exuberance
- While the liberals were in power in the years from 1906 to 1914, imperialism declined as a political topic
- The liberals preferred to disassociate themselves from colonial conflict and the excessive imperialism of the right-wing conservatives, but the continuation of empire was not questioned
Reasons for the rise in interest in Empire in the late 19th century
- A vibrant popular culture emerged in the late 19th century which celebrated Britain’s imperial glory
- Popular enthusiasm for empire was the product of a range of factors from the spread of education and greater literacy to the emergence of mass politics, following the widening of the Franchise in 1867 and 1884
- Organised entertainment, particularly in the flourishing music halls, and the spread of advertisement aimed at mass markets, were also responsible for the rise in interest
- Magazines and popular press found that “imperialism sold” meaning they would write stories or articles about empire
Alfred Harmsworth
- Owners of the Daily Mail and Daily Mirror
- “old style newspapers served the news raw, Harmsworth served it cooked”
- He saw the opportunity in producing a more popular form of journalism as most people could now read
- He pioneered the production of an entirely new form of cheap, populist newspaper n 1896 with the Daily Mail
- The paper was deliberately aimed at the lower-middle class market and sold at a low retail price
- During the second Anglo-Boer war of 1899-1902, it was selling over a million copies a day, filling its pages with stories of the war and damming the Boers and Kruger whilst praising the Heroism of the British troops
- In the early 20th century, the Mail turned its vitriol against the Germans, who were portrayed as posing a military threat to the empire
- The mail also serialised a number of patriotic books such as Erskine Childers “the Riddle of the sands” (1903) and captain Curties’ “when England Slept” (1909)
Popular press
- The years between 1890 and 1914 were something of a “golden age” of newspaper publication
- This was as technical advances in printing and the emergence of the professional journalist enabled print to respond to demand and reach out to a new mass audience of the new population who could read