Africa 1890-1914 Flashcards
Before 1890
- Before 1890, Britain were only interested in Egypt and South Africa (in Africa)
- However, after 1890, they began to become interested in the middle region of Africa, tropical Africa
- Britain’s expansion at this time was abnormal as they colonised but didn’t want to trade
Reasons for Britain’s consolidation and expansion of control before 1890
- Europe had undergone an industrial revolution and Africa had not. This caused Africa to be so far behind economically, technologically and in terms of military. This therefore meant Africa could not be the market for the goods that Britain had produced
- Europeans saw themselves as superior and saw the Africans as primitive due to social Darwinism. This therefore meant that the British would take over naturally and improve Africa through natural selection
- Africa was a place where Europeans could compete, in order to release tension, without a war taking place in Europe. Rivalry was played out in Africa
Reasons for British consolidation from 1890-1914
- From the 1890s, British policy in Africa became more assertive
- Until the 1880s, the British had largely established bases for their strategic value or for the purposes of trade, usually reacting to the actions of other powers such as the French or Germans claiming the areas where British traders had already established themselves
- Private chartered companies, before 1890, had mainly been used to occupy and administer territory as British policy had been quite cautious. However, this changed as imperial attitudes within Britain had their effect on expansion in Africa
- The conservative government, elected in 1895, was determined to uphold Britain’s position in every part of the world and this brought wars, and threats of wars, over Africa and other ambitious programmes to consolidate the Empire
- British imperialism took a less haphazard (unorganised) appearance
- British protectorates were expanded in order to provide better security to pre-existing ports, markets or resources and new territories in order to limit the advance of other European powers
- The British had to show evidence of their “effective occupation” of African territories (agreed in the Berlin conference) in order to claim them as a formal colony meaning they had to encompass both their administration and defence
- Britain were massively more advanced as a result of the industrial revolution
- Dominance in Africa was seen as a natural due to social Darwinism
Colonies and protectorates
Protectorate
- The state is protected by a larger country of power
Colony
- The state is owned by a larger power but is not geographically a part of it
Consolidation and expansion of British rule in sections of Africa between 1890 and 1914
- When certain parts of Africa were initially brought under British control and then how they were consolidated as British territories
Sierra Leone - Initially made British territory in 1808
- Protectorate was established in 1896
Gold Coast - Initially made British territory in 1867
- Incorporation of Ashantiland into Gold Coast Colon in 1902
Transvaal - Initially British territory between 1877 and December 1880
- Integrated into the British Union of South Africa in 1902
Egypt and Sudan - Initially made a British territory in 1882
- From 1899, Sudan was a condominium (joint control of a state’s affairs by other states) of Britain and Egypt until the Egyptian Protectorate was established in 1914
Southern Nigeria - Initially made a British territory in 1884
- Royal Niger Company (RNC) rule converted it into a British colony in 1906, before the establishment of united Nigeria in 1914
Northern Nigeria - Initially made a British territory in 1885
- Royal Niger Company (RNC) rule converted it into a British colony in 1900, before the establishment of united Nigeria in 1914
British East Africa - Initially made a British territory in 1888
- Imperial British East Africa Company (BEAC) rule was replaced by a formal protectorate in 1895
Uganda - Initially made a British territory in 1888
- BEAC rule was replaced by a formal protectorate in 1894
Zanzibar - Initially made a British territory in 1890
- A formal protectorate was established, albeit maintaining the rule of the Sultan of Oman
Nyasaland - Initially made a British territory in 1891
- British South African Company (BSAC) rule was replaced by a formal protectorate in 1907
Matabeleland - Initially made a British territory in 1893
- The territory was incorporated into Rhodesia in 1895
Rhodesia - Initially made a British territory in 1895
- South Rhodesia protectorate was established in 1901
- Northern Rhodesia protectorate was established in 1911
- These were both established under BSAC administration
- The occupation of territories by charted companies, which had produced evidence of “effective occupation” on behalf of Britain, gave way to formal control from the 1890s
- This was partly because the costs for companies were financially unsustainable
The use of treaties, intimidation and war to exert British control
- British expansionism came through a mixture of treaties, intimidation and aggression and was, at least partly, driven by regional disorder or perceived threats
- The British wanted to feel the boundaries of their possessions were secure and so, if borders and investments were threatened by local crises or resistance, the British felt they had every right to take action, using force and coercion (persuasion through the use of threats or force)
Treaties
- Britain’s dominance in Nigeria was recognised through an agreement with the French in 1890
- Britain took control of Zanzibar when Britain and Germany signed a treaty establishing spheres of influence in East Africa in 1890
- In 1890, King Mwanga signed a treaty with Lord Lugard of the Imperial British East Africa Company which gave the company power over Uganda’s revenue, trade and administration. These powers were transferred to the crown in 1894
- On the brink of war in 1899, the French decided to backdown and agreed to stay out of the Nile valley in return for territory in the west. In the same year, Britain and Egypt agreed a Veiled Protectorate whereby Anglo-Egyptian Sudan was established
Intimidation
- The British used both administrative and military personnel in 1898 to limit both French and Italian ambitions in Somaliland which allowed Britain to reinforce its Somaliland Protectorate
- Ashantiland – British demanded King Prempeh to handover land to the British as a protectorate in the 1890s.
- The military occupation of Nigeria allowed the British to order Khalid of Zanzibar to stand down in 1896 which led to the fourth Anglo-Ashanti war
- The 660 miles of rail track in Uganda took five years and £5 million to build and took the lives of some 2500 labourers. The project and its expense to the British taxpayer were supported by Colonial Secretary Chamberlain and the Conservative government. The Ugandan railway consolidated Britain’s formal take over of both the East Africa Protectorate and Uganda and it linked the respective colonies with each other and, crucially, with the Indian Ocean
War
- Britain conquered the Asante territories and forced Prempeh from his throne in 1896 through the 4th Anglo-Asante war
- Britain retook control of Zanzibar through the shortest war in history (38 minutes long) as Khalid was over-thrown and the pro-British Sultan Hamud was placed on he throne
- After beginning a war against the British, Sheikh Mbaruk bin Rashid fled from Kenya causing the territory to become part of Britain’s east Africa Protectorate of 1895
- In 1895 and 1896, in the Second Ndebele War, Milmo, an Ndebele spiritual leader, led an unsuccessful rising against colonial rule in what is known as the “First Chimurenga” (revolutionary struggle). This colonial rule had been established by Cecil Rhodes’ British South Africa Company as they easily defeated the Ndebele warriors in the first Ndebele war of 1893-94 with the use of maxim guns
- Nyasaland had originally been opened up by Livingstone and settled by Scottish missionaries, however, the British faced Portuguese-backed Arab attacks and it was not until 1891 that they were able to establish control there. Guerrilla warfare and indigenous resistance continued on and off until 1897, however, with the area operating under the control of Rhodes’ British South Africa Company until 1907, when it became a protectorate
- The British took further control of the Cape Colony by defeating the Boers in the second Anglo-Boer war of 1899-1902
- The British campaign in the Sudan, used as an opportunity to avenge the death of General Gordon, led to a veiled protectorate, particularly as a result of the victory at the Battle of Omdurman in 1898 through the use of maxim guns and modern artillery against an army equipped with much older weapons
The Battle of Omdurman 1898
Reasons for the British victory
- The shelling of Omdurman by the British occupied the first day of the attack
- Thousands of dervishes were mown down by the British rifles and machine guns on the 2nd of September due to poor planning
- The Dervishes’ planned assault on Kitchener was uncoordinated and forces arrived too late
- The British had superior fire power as it had maxim guns and the Lee Metford rifles (which had a range of 2,300 yards) and were fighting against an army equipped with much older weapons
What does the battle of Omdurman suggest about how the British felt towards the Sudan?
- The British clearly valued the Sudan highly as this victory sealed the political future of Sudan
- In order to avenge Gordon’s death at the hands of the Mahdists, Kitchener left the wounded enemy to die and later murdered many of the Khalifa’s leading followers. The Mahdi’s bones were also exhumed (taken out) and thrown in the Nile
The fashoda incident 1898
Key events of the Fashoda incident
- General Sir Herbert Kitchener’s army won a decisive victory in Sudanese territory at the Battle of Omdurman in 1898 after being ordered to penetrate Sudanese territory
- However, this was not quite the end of the campaign
- Kitchener had been ordered by Salisbury to, after defeating the Sudanese, go to Fashoda on the headwaters of the Nile, where a French expedition under Major Marchand had arrived
- Kitchener and Marchand both pressed their nation’s claims to the area (accusing the other of trespassing) but the meeting was not particularly fiery
- The British press, however, reacted strongly to the Fashoda incident, suggesting that Britain and France were on the brink of war
- Fortunately for Salisbury, the French government, facing internal problems and aware of the British army in Sudan, chose to back down
- By an agreement of 1899, the French promised to stay out of the Nile Valley in return for territory further west
What happened in the Sudan up to 1914
- General Gordon sent to Sudan as Governor-General
- Mahdist Revolt began in 1881
- In 1883, an Anglo-Egyptian counterattack was unsuccessful
- Gladstone ordered a withdrawal
- Gordon died in Khartoum in 1885 and Gladstone was widely criticised for failing to send support
- Various treaties attempted to reaffirm British control of the area
- General Sir Herbert Kitchener, who was appointed as Commander in Chief of the Egyptian Army, was given orders to penetrate Sudanese territory
- Kitchener was determined to go further, take Khartoum, and conquer the whole territory
- Kitchener’s army used modern weaponry such as maxim guns to gain a decisive victory against an army equipped with older weapons at the battle of Omdurman in 1898
- As a result of the Fashoda incident, a “veiled protectorate” was agreed in 1899, whereby Anglo-Egyptian Sudan was established
- This was administered in an arrangement known as a condominium which, in practice, meant Sudan would be run by the British, with Egyptian support
- Lord Kitchener was appointed as the first Governor General (officially ruling in the name of the Khedive of Egypt) and he was followed by General Reginald Wingate from 1902
- Kitchener set up “Gordon college” which trained young Sudanese for government (this was named after General Gordon”
- Despite Egyptian expectations, Britain frustrated ambitions for the unification of the two countries
- Kitchener’s conquest of the Egyptian Sudan, culminating in the Battle of Omdurman and the fall of Khartoum in 1898, was described as having secured the downfall of the worst tyranny in the world
- Although many Sudanese did welcome the downfall of the Mahdist Regime, which had a negative effect on the Sudanese economy and saw a decline of 50% of the population through famine, disease, persecution and warfare, the arrival of the British meant little more than exchanging one oppressor for another
- The British struggled to establish control over the south of Sudan for 30 years due to the Sudanese refusing to renounce their customs and pay taxes to the British
- The British tried to resolve Sudanese uprisings with a heavy hand, frequently using the death penalty, leading to further resistance
- The Sudanese were often treated brutally by the British
- There were uprisings in 1900, 1902-03, 1904 and 1908 which were all followed by an increasingly violent wave of British reprisals
- Sudan experienced considerable economic development at the hands of the British particularly in the Nile Valley:
• Telegraph and railway lines were extended to link key areas of North Sudan and Port Sudan
• Port Sudan was opened in 1906 and was the country’s principal outlet to the sea
• In 1911, a joint private and government initiative set up the Gezira scheme which provided high quality cotton for Britain’s textile industry
• There were improvements in irrigation systems
The British and the Boers
- The Boers were the ancestors of the original Dutch settlers
- They were independent and just looked after themselves
- They came into conflict with the British as the British attempted to take control of the Transvaal and Orange-Free state because the British realised these states were rich in diamonds
- The first Boer war was of a very small scale and was won by the Boers
- This result was mainly due to the British not committing 100% to the war
- The first Boer war gave the Boers increased confidence
Key reasons for why the Second Boer War began
- The British imperialists sought a unification of the whole of South Africa under the British flag whilst the Boers wanted their independence
- This problem was further confounded by the discovery of gold on the Witwatersrand in the Transvaal in 1886
- The inhabitants of the South African republic saw the newcomers (Uitlanders) as a threat to their continuing independence
- The Kruger government therefore placed restrictions on the Uitlander’s political freedom in favour of the Boers
- For example, the Uitlanders were taxed heavily but had no voting rights
- The British therefore justified their interference by saying they were protecting the rights of the Uitlanders
- The situation was exacerbated by the appointment of Joseph Chamberlain to the Colonial Office in 1895 and Sir Alfred Milner the new British High Commissioner in 1897
- Both Chamberlain and Milner were ardent imperialists, who wanted to press ahead with uniting South Africa under the British flag
- They encouraged Uitlander discontent and opposition to Kruger’s government
- They also exaggerated the seriousness of the grievances of the Uitlanders
- Over the new year weekend of 1895/96, the Jameson Raid took place
- The Jameson Raid was the most embarrassing attempt at stirring an uprising in the Transvaal
- Here, Leander Starr Jameson led a force of around 600 men with the hope of starting an uprising in the Transvaal
- It failed desperately and was a major embarrassment for the British government but to the Boers, it was almost a declaration of war
- The following years saw uneasy peace between the Boers and British, with political pressure put upon the Boers from the British
- The Boers were beginning to arm themselves during this period in preparation for a possible attack from the British
- In 1899, the situation became even more aggravated when Milner broke off talks with Kruger during the Bloemfontein Conference of 31st May to 5th June 1899
- Then British military reinforcements were dispatched to South Africa in September 1899
- By this point, the Boer republics had decided that Britain had intended to destroy their independence by force
- The government of the South African Republic, wishing to seize the military initiative, issued an ultimatum to Britain on 9th October 1899, calling for the removal of all imperial troops from the republic’s borders within 48 hours
- The British ignored this so, in October 1899, the Boers started the war with a prem-empted strike, by invading the Natal and Cape Province and quickly laying siege to three towns: Ladysmith, Mafeking and Kimberley
Reasons for British involvement in the Boer War
- The contest for supremacy between the Dutch and British
- The British were trying to protect the natives and the Uitlanders
- The economic benefits of the gold from the Transvaal
- The British needed to protect their status as an imperial power and needed to show that indigenous people couldn’t rebel that easily
- The British are a much greater power than the south African Republic and they would therefore control the Boer states better than the irresponsible powers that are the south Africans
- If the British didn’t take control, someone else would
- Britain were searching for markets to sell things to and the Boer states had this.
- Britain felt they had to step in as the government was inefficient and corrupt