Attachment: Romanian Orphans Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are key terms for Romanian orphan studies?

A
  • Institutionalisation
  • Disinhibited attachment behaviour
  • Intellectual disability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who carried out the Romanian orphans study?

A

Rutter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was the aim of Romanian orphans study?

A

Rutter aimed to find out if the good care they received in Britain has any reversal on the effects of their institutionalisation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the method of the Romanian Orphans study?

A
  • Found 165 Romanian orphans and tested them at the age of 4,6,11 and 15.
  • Examining physical, emotional and cognitive development
  • Could be compared to control group
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was the control group used in Romanian Orphans study?

A

Consisted of 52 British orphans adopted around same age.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What were the Romanian orphans like when they first arrived in UK?

A

Their intellectual development was below average and they were extremely malnourished.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What ages when adopted were compared?

A

Compared before 6 months old vs after 6 months when adopted.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Romanian Orphans study findings: Different rates of recovery (IQ)

A

-Mean IQ of children adopted before 6 months was higher than those adopted after 6 months. These differences remained the same at age of 16 (Beckett et al)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Romanian orphans study findings: Attachment

A

Those adopted after 6 months showed a particular attachment style called disinhibited attachment. (Symptoms also included attention seeking and clinginess)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is disinhibited attachment?

A

Where the children would act the same towards strangers as they would the caregivers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is institutionalisation?

A

Any effects of living in an institutional setting. E.g. orphanage, prison.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the main affects caused by institutionalisation?

A
  • Disinhibited attachment behaviour

- Intellectual disability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Why did the orphans suffer from disinhibited attachment?

A

Living in institutions had multiple care-givers and had no sensitivity of care. No secure attachment formed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is intellectual disability?

A

Abnormally low IQ when compared to those of same age.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What did Rutters study show about the effects the effects of institutionalisation on intellectual-disability?

A

Showed that those adopted before age of 6 months could catch up to control group. Shows the effects can be reversed if adopted before 6 months.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What research is used in comparison to Romanian Orphans study?

A

Zeanah- Bucharest Early Intervention study.

17
Q

Summary of Zeanah’s study?

A
  • 95 children (12-31 months) attachment was assessed on children who spent most of their lives in an institution. (used strange situation)
  • Most had disinhibited attachment
18
Q

What are advantages of rutters study?

A
  • Longitudinal study - lots of detailed info over a long period of time.
  • Research has enabled a better understanding of institutions.
  • Shown privation can be reversed, suggesting Bowlby exaggerated.
19
Q

Disadvantages of Rutters study?

A
  • Individual Differences - Rutter has suggested some children may have received special attention in institution. (affecting validity)
  • Long-term effects not yet clear.