Attachment (P1) Flashcards

1
Q

Define reciprocity

Caregiver-infant interactions

A

A description of how two people interact

Caregiver-infant interaction is reciprocal in that both caregiver and baby respond to each other’s signals and each elicits a response from the other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define interactional synchrony

Caregiver-infant interactions

A

Caregiver and baby reflect both the actions and emotions of the other and do this in a co-ordiated (synchronised) way

the temporal co-ordination of micro-level social behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Reciprocity

Describe alert phases

Caregiver-infant interactions

A

Babies have periodic alert phases in which they signal they are ready for interaction

Research shows that mothers typically pick up on and respond to their baby’s alertness around 2/3rds of the time

This varies according to the skill of the mother and external factors (stress)

From around 3 months this interaction tends to become increasingly frequent and involves the baby and mother paying close attention to each other’s verbal signals and facial expressions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Reciprocity

Describe active involvemnt

Caregiver-infant interactions

A

Traditional views of childhood suggested babies have a passive role

Now seems babies take an active role as well as the caregiver

Both caregiver abd baby can initiate interactions and take turns doing so

Interaction is similar to a dance as they respond to eachother’s moves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

interactional synchrony

Describe the process of synchrony beginning

A

**Meltzoff and Moore (1977)
**
observed beginning of interactional synchrony in babies as yung as 2 weeks old

An adult displayed 1 of 3 facial expressions or 1 of 3 distinctive gestures

Baby’s response was filmed and labelled by independent observers

Babies’ expression and gestures were more likely to mirror those of the adults more than chance would predict i.e. there was a significant association

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Interactional synchrony

Describe the importance for attachment

Caregiver-infant interactions

A

Interactional synchrony is important to the development of caregiver-infant interactions

Isabella et al (1989)
observed 30 mothers and babies together and assessed the degree of synchrony. Also assessed the quality of mother-baby attachment
findings - high levels of synchrony were associated with better quality mother-baby attachment (e.g. emotional intensity of the relationship)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define attachment

A

Close two-way emotional bond between 2 indivduals in which each individual sees the other as essential forr their own emotional security

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When can we recognise an attachment?

A

Proximity (trying to stay physically closer to their attachment figure)

**Seperation distress **(show signs of anxiety when attachment figure leaves their presence)

Secure-base behaviour (even when independent of attachment figures tend to make regular contact with them e.g. babies regularly return to their attachment figure while playing)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are strengths of research into caregiver-infant interactions?

Caregiver-infant interactions

A
  1. Filmed observations
  2. Research support

  1. Research typically filmed in a laboratory. Means that other activity that might distract a baby can be controlled. Filmed allows observations to be analysed multiple times. Therefore less likely reearchers will have missed any behaviours. Also allows more researchers to record data establishing inter-rater reliablilty of observations. Babies don’t they’re being observed so behaviour doesn’t change (issue in overt observations). Data collected has good validity and reliability
  2. Evidence that suggests early interactions are important. Isabella et al (1989) found that achievement of international synchrony predicted the devlopment of a good quality attachment. This means that on balance caregiver-infant interaction is probably important in development
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are limitations of research into caregiver-infant interactions?

Caregiver-infant inter

A
  1. Difficulty observing behaviours
  2. Observing a behaviour doesn’t reveal its developmental importance

  1. Young babies lack co-ordination and much of their bodies are almost immobile. The movement observed are just small hand movements or subtle changes in expression. Difficult to determine what is taking place from the baby’s perspective (e.g. can’t tell if a movement is caused by something caregiver has done). Cannot be certain that the behaviours seen in caregiver-infant interactions have a special meaning
  2. Feldman (2012) points out that ideas like synchrony (and by implication reciprocity) simply give names to patternns of observable caregiver and baby behaviours. These are robust phenomena as they cab be reliably observed but they still may not be particularly useful in understanding child development as ut does not tell us the purpose of these behaviours. Cannot be certain from observational research alone that reciprocity and synchrony are important for a child’s development
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Define stages of attachment

Schaffer’s stages of attachment

A

Many devlopmental theories identify a sequence of qualitatively different behaviours linked to specific ages

In the case of stages of attachment qualitatively different infant (baby) behaviours are linked to specific ages and all babies go through them in the same order

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define multiple attachments

Schaffer’s stages of attachment

A

Attachments to 2 or more people

Most babies appear to develop multiple attachments once they have formed one strong attachment to one of their careers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Describe stage 1

Schaffer’s stagges of attachment

A

Asocial stage

First few weeks of life

Behaviour towards humans and inaminate objects similar

Not entirely asocial, they prefer to be with other people

Also tend to show a preference for the company of familar people and are easily comforted by them

Currently forming bonds with certain people which turn into basis of later attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Describe stage 2

Schaffer’s stagges of attachment

A

Indiscriminate attachment

2-7 months

Clear prefrence for being with other huans rather than inanimate objects

Recognise and prefer company of familar people

Still accept comfort from any person

Don’t show seperation anxiety or stranger anxiety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Describe stage 3

Schaffer’s stagges of attachment

A

Specific attachment

From around 7 months start to display the signs of attachment towards one person

Signs include stranger anxiety and seperation anxiety

Baby has formed a specific attachment to a person known as the primary attachment figure

Primary attachment figure isn’t necessarily the individual the child spends most time with but one who offers the most interaction and responds to the baby’s signals with the most skill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe stage 4

Schaffer’s stagges of attachment

A

Multiple attachments

By 1 year-old majority of babies had developed multiple attachments

Shortly after babies start to show attachment behaviour (e.g seperation and stranger anxiety) towars 1 person they extend this to multiple attachments with others they regularly spend time with known as secondary attachments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Describe sample of Schaffer and Emerson’s research?

Schaffer’s stagges of attachment

A

60 babies

31 male

29 fenale

All from Glasgow and working-class families

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Describe procedure of Schaffer and Emerson’s research

Schaffer’s stagges of attachment

A

Researchers visited babies and mothers in their own homes every month for the 1st year and again at 18 months

Researchers asked the mothers questions about the kind of protest their babies showed in 7 everyday seperations

Designed to measure the babies attachment and assessed stranger anxiety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Describe findings of Schaffer and Emerson’s research

Schaffer’s stagges of attachment

A

identified 4 distinct stages in the development of infant attachment behaviour

  1. Asocial stage
  2. Indiscriminate attachment
  3. Specific attachment
  4. Multiple attachments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What are strengths of Schaffer and Emerson’s stages of attachment?

Schaffer’s stagges of attachment

A
  1. Good external validity
  2. Real-world application

  1. Most of the observations (though not stranger anxiety) were made by parents during ordinary activities and reported to the researchers. The alternative would’ve been to have researchers present to record observations. This might’ve distracted the babies or made them feel more anxious. This means it is highly likely that the participants behaved naturally while being observed
  2. Practical application in day care (where babies are cared for by a non-family adult outside their home). In the asocial (1) and indiscriminate (2) stages day care is likely to be straightfoward as babies can be comforted by any skilled adult. However Schaffer and Emerson’s research tells us that day care especially starting day care with an unfamiliar adult may be problematic during specific attachment stage (3). This means that parents use of day care can be planned using Schaffer and Emmerson’s stages
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What are limitations of Schaffer and Emerson’s stages of attachment?

A
  1. Poor evidence for the asocial stage
  2. Poor validity of the research which the stages of attachment are based on

  1. Limitation is the validity of the measures they used to assess attachment in the asocial stage. Young babies have poor co-ordination and are fairly immobile. If babies less than 2 months old felt anxiety in everyday situations they might’ve displayed this in hard-to-observe ways. This made it difficult for mothers to observe and report back to researchers on signs of anxiety and attachment in this age group. This means that the babies may have actually be quite social but because of flawed methods they appear to be asocial
  2. There are issues with asking the mothers to be the ‘observers’. They were unlikely to be objective observers. They might’ve been biased in terms of what they noticed and what they reported (e.g. might not have noticed when their baby was showing signs of anxiety or may have misremembered it). This means that even if babies behaved naturally their behaviour may have not been accurately recorded
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Define the term father

The role of the father

A

In attachment research the father is anyone who takes on the role of the main male caregiver

This can be but is not necessarily the biological father

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Describe attachment to fathers

The role of the father

A

Evidence suggests fathers are much more less likely to become babies’ first attachment figure compared to mothers

Schaffer and Emerson (1964) found majority of babies 1st became attached to their mother at around 7 months. In only 3% of cases the father was the first attahment. In 27% of cases the father was the joint 1st object of mother with the mother

Fathers become important attachment figures. 75% of the babies studied by Schaffer and Emerson formed an attachment with their father by 18 months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Do adult male caregivers make a unique contribution to early development?

The role of the father

A

Grossmann et al (2002)

carried out a longitudinal study where babies’ attachments were studied until they were teens.

Looked at both parents’ behaviour and its relationship to the qualty of their baby’s later attachments to other people

Quality of a baby;s attachment with mothers but not fathers was related to attachments in adolescence.

This suggests that attachment to fathers is less important than attachment to mothers

Grossmann et al also found the quality of fathers’ play with babies was related to the quality of adolscent attachments.

This suggests that fathers have a different role from mothers. Fathers’ role is more to do with play and stimulation, less with emotional development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
What does a baby's relationship with their primary attachment figure form the basis of? | The role of the father
All later close emotional relationships
26
Describe fathers as primary attachment figures | The role of the father
When fathers take on the role of primary caregiver they are able to adopt the emotional role more typically associated with mothers ## Footnote Field (1978) filmed 4-month-old babies in face-to-face interaction with primary caregiver mothers, secondary caregiver fathers and primary caregiver fathers. Primary caregiver fathers spent more time smiling, imitating and holding babies than the secondary caregiver fathers. These are all part of the process of attachment formation Can provide responsiveness required for a close emotional attachment but perhaps only express this when given the role of primary caregivers
27
What are strengths of research into the role of the father? | The role of the father
1. Real-world application 2. Lines of research may not be in conflict ## Footnote 1. Can be used to offer advice to parents. Parents agonise over decision of who should be the primary caregiver. Mothers may feel pressured to stay at home because of stereotypical views of mother's and father's roles. Fathers may feel pressured to focus on work rather than parenting. In some families this may not be the best economic solution. Research into the role of the father can be used to offer reassuring advice to parents. For example heterosexual parents can be informed that fathers are capable of becoming primary attachment figure. Also lesbian-parent and single-mother families can be informed that not having a father around doesn't affect a child's development. Parental anxiety about the role of the father can be reduced 2. It could be that fathers typically take on distinctive roles in two-parent heterosexual families, but that parents in a single-mother and lesbian-parent families simply adapt to accomodate the role played by fathers. When present fathers tend to adopt a distinctive role but families can adapt to not having a father
28
What are limitations of research into the role of the father? | The role of the father
1. Confusion over research questions 2. Conflicting evidence ## Footnote 1. The question "what is the role of the father?" in the context of attachment is ectremely complicated. Some researchers attempting to answer this question actually want to understand the role of fathers as secondary attachment figures. But others are more concerend with fathers as a primary attachment figure. The former have tended to see fathers as behaving differently from mothers and having a distinct role. The latter have found that fathers can take on a maternal role. This makes it difficul to offer a simple answer to the role of the father as it really depends on what specific role is being discussed 2. Research into the role of the fathers vary according to methodology used. Longitudinal studies (e.g. Grossmann et al) have suggested that fathers as secondary attachment figures have an important and distinct role in their child's development involvong play and stimulation. We would therefore expect that children growing up in lesbian-parent and single-mother families would develop differently from those in two-parent heterosexual families. In studies (e.g. McCallum and Golombok 2004) consistently show that these children do not develop differently from children in two-parent heterosexual families. Leaves question as to whether fathers have a distinct role remains unanswered
29
Define animal studies | Animal studies of attachment
Studies carried out on non-human animal species rather than on humans either for practical or ethical resons ## Footnote Practical because animals breed faster and researchers are interested in seeing results across multiple generations
30
# Lorenz's research When did Lorenz first observe imprinting? | Animal studies of attachment
As a child ## Footnote A neighbour gave him a newly hatched duckling that then followed him around
31
# Lorenz's research Describe the procedure of Lorenz's research | Animal studies of attachment
Randomly divided a large clutch of goose eggs Half the eggs were hatched with the mother goose in their natural environment The other half hatched in an incubator where the first moving objectthey saw was Lorenz
32
# Lorenz's research Describe the findings of Lorenz's research | Animal studies of attachment
Incubator followed Lorenz everywhere whereas the control group followed their biological mother When the 2 groups were mixed up the control group continued to follow the mother and the experimental group followed Lorenz Phenomenom called imprinting - bird species who were mobile from birth, attach tp and follow the first moving object they see Identified a critical period in which imprinting needs to take place. Depending on the species this can be as brief as a few hours after hatching/birth. If imprinting does not occur within that time Lorenz found that chicks didn't attach themselves to a mother figure
33
# Lorenz's research Describe Lorenz's case study on sexual imprinting | Animal studies of attachment
Describe a peacock that had been reared in the reptile house of a zoo where the first moving objects the peacock saw after hatching were giant tortoises. As an adult this bird would only direct courtship behaviour towards giant tortoises Lorenz concluded the peackock had undergone sexual imprinting
34
# Harlow's research Describe the sample of Harlow's research
16 rhesus monkeys
35
# Harlow's research: importance of contact comfort Describe the procedure of Harlow's reseach
Reared 16 baby monkeys with 2 wire model mothers In one condition milk was dispensed by the plain-wire mother in the second condtionthe milk was dispensed by the cloth-covered mother
36
# Harlow's research: importance of contact comfort Describe the findings of Harlow's research | Animal studies in attachment
Monkeys prefered to cuddle with the cloth-covered mother rather than the plain-wire mother Also sought comfort from the cloth-covered mother when frightened (e.g. by a noisy mechanical teddy bear) regardless of which mother dispensed milk ## Footnote This showed that contanct comfort was of more importance to monkeys than food when it came to attachment behaviour
37
# Harlow's research: maternally deprived monkeys as adults Did early maternal deprivation have a permanent effect?
Yes ## Footnote Researchers found sevre consequences
38
# Harlow's research: maternally deprived monkeys as adults Monkeys reared with ____ mothers only were the most dysfunctional | Animal studies in attachment
plain-wire
39
40
# Harlow's research What were characteristics of maternally deprived monkeys as adults? | Animal studies of attachment
Aggressive Less socialable Bred less than typical monkeys Unskilled at mating When they became mothers some neglected thier young and others attacked their young (even killing them)
41
# Harlow's research When was the critical period for normal development? | Animal studies in attachment
90 days ## Footnote A mother figure had to be introduced to a young monkey within 90 days for an attachment to form After this period attachment was impossible and damge done by early deprivation became irreversible
42
# Lorenz's research What is a strength? | Animal studies of attachment
Research support ## Footnote Regolin and Vallortigara (1995) - support Lorenz's idea of imprinting Chicks were exposed to simple shape combinations that moved such as a triangle with a rectangle in front A range of shape combinations were then moved in front of them and they followed the original most closely This suppots the view that young animals are born with an innate mechanism to imprint on a moving object present in the critical window of development as predicted by Lorenz
43
# Lorenz's research What is a limitation? | Animal studies of attachment
Generalisabilty to humans ## Footnote The mammalian attachment system is quite different and more complex than in birds. For example in mammals attachment is a two-way process soit isn't just the young who become attached to their mothers but also the mammalian mothers show an emotional attachment to their young This means that it is probably not appropiate to generalise Lorenz's ideas to human
44
# Harlow's research What is a strength? | Animal studies of attachment
real-world applications ## Footnote It has helped social workers and clinical psychologists understand that a lack of bonding experience may be a risk factor in child development allowing them to intervene to prevent poor outcomes Also now understand the importance of attachment figures for baby monkeys in zoos and breeding programmes in the wild Value of research is not just theoretical but practica;
45
# Harlow's research What is a limitation? | Animal studies of attachment
Generalisabilty to humans ## Footnote Ability to generalise findings and conclusions from monkeys to humans Rhesus monkeys are much more similar to humans than Lorenz's birds and all mamals sharesome attachment behaviours However the human brain and human behaviour is still more complex than that of monkeys Not appropiate to generalise Harlow's findinfs to humans
46
Who proposed Learning theory? | Explanations of attachment: Learning theory
Dollard and Miller
47
Define learning theory | Explanations of attachment: Learning theory
A set of theories from the behaviourist approach in psychology that emphasises the role of learning in the acquisition of behaviour ## Footnote Explanations for learning of behaviour include classical and operant conditioning
48
Describe process of classical conditioning in attachment | Explanations of attachment: Learning theory
When the caregiver provides food over time they become associated with food When the baby sees the caregiver there is an expectation of food Once conditioning has taken place the sight of the caregiver produces a conditioned response of pleasure Conditioned pleasure response is love (attachment is formed, caregiver becomes attachment figure) ## Footnote Uncondtioned Stimulus - Food Unconditioned response - Pleasure Neutral stimulus - Caregiver Conditioned stimulus - caregiver Conditioned response - pleasure
49
Describe process of operant conditioning in attachment | Explanations of attachment: Learning theory
Baby crying leads to a response from the caregiver e.g. feeding As long as the caregiver provides the corrrect response, crying is reinforced The baby then directs crying for comfort towards the caregiver who responds with comforting socal suppressor behaviour two-way process, caregiver recieves negative reinforcement because the crying stops (escaping from something unpleasant) Mutual reinforcement strengthens attachment
50
Explain attachment as a secondary drive | Explanations of attachment: Learning theory
Hunger is a primary drive (an innate biological motivator) we are motivated to eat in order to reduce the hunger drive As caregivers provide food the primary drive of hunger becomes generalised to them Attachment is thus a secondary drive learned by an association between the caregver and the satisfaction of a primary drive
51
What is a limitation? | Explanations of attachment: Learning theory
1. Counter evidence from animal studies 2. counter-evidence from human studies ## Footnote 1. Lorenz's geese imprinted on the first moving object they saw regardless if whether this object was associated with food. Harlow's monkeys displayed attachment behaviour towards a soft surrogate mother in preference to a wire one which provided milk. Shows factors other than association with food are important in formation of attachments 2. Schaffer and Emerson found that babies tended to form their main attachment to their mother regardless of whether she was the one who usually fed them. Isabella et al found that high levels of interactional synchrony predicted the quality of attachment. This suggests that food is not the main factor in the formation of human attachments
52
What is a strength? | Explanations of attachment: Learning theory
1. Some conditioning may be involved ## Footnote 1. Elements of conditioning could be involved in some aspects of attachment. It seems unlikely that association with food plays a central role in attachment but conditioning may still play a role. For example a baby may associate feeling warm and comfortable with the presence of a particular adult and this may influence the baby's choice of their main attachment figure. This means that learning theory may still be useful in understanding the development of attachments **COUNTERPOINT** - Classical and operant conditioning explanations see the baby playing a relatively passive role in attachment development simply responding to associations with comfort or reward. In fact research shows that babies take a very active role in the interactions that produce attachment e.g. Fieldman and Eidelman. This means that conditioning may not be an adequate explanation of any aspect of attachment
53
Define monotropic | Explanations of attachment: Bowlby's monotropic theory
One particular attacchment is different from all others and of central importance to a child's development
54
Describe monotropy in Bowlby's monotropic theory | Explanations of attachment: Bowlby's monotropic theory
Placed great emphasis on child's attachment to a particular caregiver believing this attachment is more important than others Called this person the 'mother' but they did not need to be female or biological mother More time spent with mother-figure the better
55
What 2 laws clarified the more time spent with the mother-figure the better? | Explanations of attachment: Bowlby's monotropic theory
1. The law of continuity 2. The law of accumulated seperation ## Footnote 1. The more constant and predictable a child's care, the better the quality of their attachment 2. The effects of every seperation from the mother add up
56
What are social releasers | Explanations of attachment: Bowlby's monotropic theory
Babies are born with a set of innate cute behaviours (smiling, cooing, gripping) that encourage attention from adults
57
What is the purpose of social releasers? | Explanations of attachment: Bowlby's monotropic theory
To activate adult social interaction and so make an adult attach to the baby ## Footnote Recognised attachment was reciprocal process and the mother and baby are hard wired to become attached
58
When is the critical period? | Explanations of attachment: Bowlby's monotropic theory
around 6 months to 2 yrs ## Footnote around 6 months when the infant attachment system is active Lasts till around 2 years
59
What did Bowlby view the critical period as? | Explanations of attachment: Bowlby's monotropic theory
Sensitive period
60
What happens if an attachment isn't formed in the critical period | Explanations of attachment: Bowlby's monotropic theory
A child will find it harder to form an attachment later
61
Define internal working model | Explanations of attachment: Bowlby's monotropic theory
Our mental representations of the world e.g. the representations we have of our relationship to our primary attachment figure This model affects our future relationships because it carries our perception of what relationships are like
62
# Internal working model what expectation would be formed by a child whose first experience is of a loving relationship with a reliable caregiver? | Explanations of attachment: Bowlby's monotropic theory
That all relationships are as loving and reliable ## Footnote They will bring these qualities to future relationships
63
# Internal working model What expectation would be formed by a child whose first relationship involves poor treatment? | Explanations of attachment: Bowlby's monotropic theory
Expect similar poor treatment from others and/or treat otherss in that way ## Footnote Tend to form further poor relationships
64
What is the most important affect of the internal working model on children? | Explanations of attachment: Bowlby's monotropic theory
Later ability to be a parent themselves ## Footnote People tend to base their parenting behaviour on their own experience of being parented Explains why children from functional families tend to have similar families themselves
65
What are strengths? | Explanations of attachment: Bowlby's monotropic theory
1. Research support - social releasers 2. Research support - internal working model ## Footnote 1. Brazelton et al (1975) observed babies trigger interactions with adults using social releasers. The researchers then instructed the babies' primary attachment figures to ignore their babies' social releasers. Babies (who were prieviously shown to be normally responsive) became increasingly distressed and some eventually curled up and lay motionless. This illustrates the role of social releasers in emotional development and suggests that they are important in the process of attachment development 2. Bailey et al (2007) assessed attachment relationships in 99 mothers and their one-year-old babies. The researchers measureed the mothers' attachment to their own primary attachment figures. The researchers also assessed the attachment quality of the babies. They found that mothers with poor attachment to their own primary attachment figures were more likely to have poorly attached babies. This supports Bowlby's idea that mothers' ability to form attachments to their babies is influenced by their internal working model
66
What are limitations? | Explanations of attachment: Bowlby's monotropic theory
1. Validity of montropy challenged 2. ## Footnote 1. Schaffer and Emerson (1964) found that although most babies did attatch to one person at first, a significant minority formed multiple attachments at the same time. Also although the first attachment does appear to have a particularly strong influence on later behaviour this may simply mean it is stronger not necessarily different in quality from the child's other attachments. For example other attachments to family members provide all the same key qualities (emotional support, a safe base etc) 2. Some psychologists believe that genetic differences in anxiety and socialability affect social behaviour in both babies and adullts. These differences could also impact on their parenting ability (Kornienko 2016). This means that Bowlby may have overstated the importance of the internal working model in social behaviour and parenting at the expense of other factors
67
Define strange situation | Types of attachment
A controlled observation designed to test attachment security. ## Footnote Babies are assessed on their response to playing in an unfamiliar room, being left alone, left with a stranger, and being reunited with a caregiver
68
# Ainsworth's strange situation Describe the procedure | Types of attachment
takes place in a room with controlled conditions and a two-way mirror and/or cameras which psychologists can observe from 7 episodes each lasting 3 minutes Beginning: Caregiver and baby enter an unfamilar playroom 1. Baby is encouraged to explore - tests exploration and secure base 2. A stranger comes in, talks to the caregiver, and approaches the baby - Tests stranger anxiety 3. The caregiver leaves the baby and stranger together - Tests seperation and stranger anxiety 4. The caregiver retuurns and the stranger leaves - Tests reunion behaviour and secure base/exploration 5. The caregiver leaves the baby alone - Tests separation anxiety 6. The stranger returns - Tests stranger anxiety 7. The caregiver returns and is reunited with the baby - Tests reunion behaviour
69
# Ainsworth's strange situation Define proximity-seeking | Types of attachment
A baby with a good quality attachment will stay fairly close to a caregiver
70
# Ainsworth's strange situation Define exploration and secure-base behaviour | Types of attachment
Good attachment enables a baby to feel confident to explore using their caregiver as a secure base i.e. a point of contact that will make them feel safe
71
# Ainsworth's strange situation Defines stranger anxiety | Types of attachment
Display of anxiety when a stranger approaches ## Footnote One of the signs of becoming closely attached is a display of anxiety when a stranger approaches
72
# Ainsworth's strange situation Define seperation anxiety | Types of attachment
Protests at seperation from the caregiver ## Footnote Another sign of becoming attached is to protest at seperation from the caregiver
73
# Ainsworth's strange situation Descrive response to reunion | Types of attachment
Babies greet the caregiver's return with pleasure and seek comfort
74
# Ainsworth's strange situation Describe the findings | Types of attachment
Found there were distinct patters in the way that babies behaved Identified 3 types of attachment: 1. Secure attachment (Type B) 2. Insecure-avoidant attachment (Type A) 3. Insecure-resistant attachment (Type C)
75
# Ainsworth's strange situation Describe Secure attachment: Incuding type | Types of attachment
Type B These babies explore happily but regularly go back to their caregiver (proximity seeking and secure-base behaviour). They usually show moderate seperation distress and moderate stranger anxiety. Securely attached behaviours require and accept comfort from the caregiver in the reunion stage. ## Footnote About 60-75% of British babies are classified as secure
76
# Ainsworth's strange situation Describe Insecure-avoidant attachment: including type
Type A These babies explore freely but do not seek proximity or show secure-base behaviour They show little or no reaction when their caregiver leaves and little stranger anxiety They made little effort to make contact when the caregiver returns and may even avoid such contact ## Footnote About 20-25% of British babies are classified as insecure-avoidant
77
# Ainsworth's strange situation Describe insecure-resistant attachment: including type | About 60-75% of British babies are classified as secure
Type C These babies seek greater proximity than others and so explore less They show high levels of stranger and seperation distress but they resist comfort when reunited with their caregiver ## Footnote Around 3% of British babies are classified as insecure-avoidant
78
# Ainsworth's strane situation What are strengths of the Strange Situation? | Types of attachment
1. Validity 2. Reliability ## Footnote 1. Predicts a number of aspects of the baby's later development. A large body of research has shown that babies and toddlers assessed as Type B (secure) tend to have better outcomes than others both in later childhood and in adulthood. In childhood this includes better achievement in school and less involvement in bullying (McCormick et al 2016. Kokkinos 2007). Securely attached babies also tend to go on to have better mental health in adulthood (Ward et al 2006). Those babies assessed as having insecure-resistant attatchment and those not falling into Type A, B or C tend to have the worst outcomes. Strange situation measures something real and meaningful in a baby's development 2. Good inter-rater reliabilty. Bick et al (2012) tested inter-rater reliabilty for the strange situation for a team of trained observersand found agreement on attachment type in 94% of cases. This high level of reliabilty may be because the procedure takes place under controlled conditions and because behaviors involve large movements and are therefore easy to observe.
79
# Ainswoth's strange situation What are limitations of the Strange Situation?
1. Culture-bound 2. Strange situation may not be measuring attachment ## Footnote 1. May not be a valid measure of attachment in different cultural contexts. Strange Situation was developed in Britian and USA. It is only valid in Western Europe and USA. A reason for this is that babies have different experiences in different cultures and these experiences may affect their resposnes to the Strange Situation. In a Japanese study Takashi (1990) suggests that this anxiety resonse wasn't due to high rates of attachment insecurity but to the unusual nature of the experience in Japan where mother-baby seperation is rare. It is very difficult to know what the Strange Situation is measuring outside Western Europe and the USA 2. The Strange Situation clearly measures something important that's assocated with later development. However not all psychologists believe this something is attachment. Kagan (1982) suggested that genetically-influenced anxiety levels could account for variation in attachment behaviour in the Strange Situation and later development. Strange situation may not actually measyre attachment.
80
Define cultural variations | Cultural variations in attachment
Culture refers to the norms and values that exist within any group of people Cultural variations then are the differences in norms and vaues that exist between people in different groups
81
# IJzenddornand Kroonenbeg What did their study look at? | Cultural variations in attachment
The proportions of secure, insecure-avoidant and insecure-resistant attachments across a range of countries to assess cultural variation Also looked at the differences within the same countries to understand variations within a culture
82
# IJzendoorn and Kroonenberg Describe the procedure | Cultural variations in attachment
Located 32 studies of attachment where the strange situation had been used to investigate the proportions of babies with different attachment types Conducted in eight countries 15 in USA Overall studies yielded results for 1,990 children Data was meta analysed
83
# IJzendoorn and Kroonenberg Describe the findings | Cultural variations in attachment
Wide variations between the proportions of attachment types in different studies In all countries secure attachment was the most common classification Proportion varied from 75% in Britain to 50% in China Results of studies in the same country were 150% greater than those between countries ## Footnote In individualist cultures rates of insecure-resistant attachment were similar to Ainsworth's original sample (all under 14%) In collectivist samples (e.g. China) rates were above 25% (rates of insecure-avoidants were reduced)
84
# Simonelli et al (2014) Describe the procedure | Cultural variations in achievement
In Italy Assessed 76 babies aged 12 months using strange situation
85
# Simonelli et al (2014) Describe the findings | Cultural variations in achievement
50% were secure 36% were insecure-avoidant ## Footnote Lower rate of secure attachment and higher rate of insecure-avoidant attachment than found in many studies This is because of increasing numbers of mothers of very young chldren working long hours and using professional childcare Patterns of attachment types vary in line with cultural change
86
# Kyoung Jin et al (2012) Describe the procedure | Cultural variations in attachment
A Korean study Strange situation used to assess 87 babies
87
# Kyoung Jin et al (2012) Describe the findings | Cultural variations in attachment
Overall proportion of insecure and secure babies were similar to most countries with most babies being secure However most of those classified as insecurely attached were resistant and only 1 was avoidant ## Footnote Similar to findings in Japan Japan and Korea have quite similar child-rearing style which may explain the similarity
88
What are the conclusions of cultural variations in attachment? | Cultural variations in attachment
Secure attachments seems to be the norm in a wide range of cultures This supports Bowlby's idea that attachment is innate and universal Cultural practices have an influence on attachment type
89
What are strengths of research into cultural variations in attachment | Cultural variations in attachment
1. Indigenous researchers ## Footnote 1. Most studies were conducted by indigenous researchers. Indigenous psychologists are those from the same cultural background as the participants. For example IJzendoorn and Kroonenberg included research by a German team (Grossmann et al). This kind of research means that many of the potential problems in cross-cultural research can be avoided such as researchers' misunderstandings of the language used by participants or having difficulty communicating instructions to them. Difficulties can also include bias because of one nation's stereotypes of another. This means that there is a chance that researchers and participants communicated successfully enhancing the validity of the data collected
90
What are limitations of research into cultural variation in attachment? | Cultural variations in attachment
1. Confounding variables 2. Imposed etic ## Footnote 1. Impact on confounding variables on findings. Studies conducted in different countries aren't usually matched for methodology when they're compared to reviews or meta-analyses. Sample characteristics e.g. poverty, social class and urban/rural make-up can confound results as can the age of participants. Environmental variables might also differ between studies and confound results. For example the size of the room, availabilty of interesting toys - babies mightt appear to explore more in studies conducted in small rooms with attractive toys compared to large bare rooms. Less visible proximity-seeking because of room size might make a child more likely to be classified as avoidant. This means that looking at attachment behaviour in different non-matched studies conducted in different countries may not tell us anything about cross-cultural patterns of attachment 2. Trying to impose a test designed for one cultural context to another context. Cross-cultural psychology includes the ideas of emic (cultural uniqueness) and etic (cross-cultural universality). Imposed etic occurs when we impose idea or technique that works in one cultural context to another. An example of this is the use of babies' response to reunion with the caregiver in Strange Situation. In Britain and USA lack of affection on reunion may indicate an avoidant attachment but in Germany this would be seen as independence rather than insecurity. Therefore the part of Strange Situation may not work in Germany. This means that the behaviours measured by the strange situation may not have the same meanings in different cultural contexts and comparing them across cultures is meaningless
91