attachment Flashcards

1
Q

what is reciprocity (caregiver-infant interactions)?

A

-mothers respond to infant alertness (from 3 months close attention between mother and infant).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is interactional synchrony?

A
  • interactions become coordinated.

- isabella: quality of attachment related to synchrony.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

evaluate caregiver-infant interactions (studies).

A
  • hard to know what is happening = simple gestures and expressions have to be assumed.
  • controlled observations = captures fine details of the interactions
  • purpose of synchrony and reciprocity = Feldman: just observations, the purpose is not entirely understood.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is the role of the father?

A

-Grossman = attachments to fathers less important but fathers may have a different role i.e. play and stimulation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the typical parent-infant attachment?

A

-traditionally mother-infant, (other attachments figures like fathers may be important).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

how can the fathers be primary caregivers?

A

-Field: fathers as primary caregivers adopt attachment behaviour more typical of mothers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

evaluate attachment figures.

A
  • inconsistent findings = different research questions - the overall picture is unclear.
  • children without fathers aren’t different = suggests father role isn’t important
  • fathers aren’t primary attachment figures = may be due to traditional gender roles or biological differences.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are the aims, methods and findings of Schaffer and Emerson’s attachment study (stages of attachment).

A
  • aims: investigate the age of attachment formation and who attachments are formed with.
  • method: mothers of 60 from Glasgow reported monthly on separation anxiety.
  • findings: most babies showed attachment to a primary caregiver by 32 weeks and showed multiple attachments soon after this.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

evaluate Schaffer and Emerson’s study.

A
  • good external validity = observations were in participants’ natural environment.
  • longitudinal design = same participants observed at each age, eliminating individual differences.
  • limited generalisability = all families were from the same area and was over 50 years ago meaning there’s a lack of generalisability.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are the four stages of attachment?

A
  • asocial stage (little observable social behaviour)
  • indiscriminate attachment (accepts cuddles of anyone, more observable).
  • specific attachment (stranger and separation anxiety in regards to strangers).
  • multiple attachments (attach. behaviours directed towards more than one adult (secondary).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

evaluate the four stages of attachment.

A
  • asocial stage = hard to observe, so doesn’t mean they are asocial.
  • conflicting evidence = van Ijzendoom: research in different contexts found multiple attachments may appear first.
  • measuring multiple attachments = protesting children at adult departure doesn’t equal attachments.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is the procedure, the findings and the conclusion of Lorenz’s animal research?

A
  • procedure = Goslings saw Lorenz when they hatched.
  • findings = newly hatched chicks attach to the first moving object they see (imprinting).
  • sexual imprinting = adult birds try to mate with whatever object they imprint on.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

evaluate Lorenz’s animal research.

A
  • generalisability = birds and mammals have different attachment systems, which may not be relevant to humans.
  • questionable observations = Guiton: birds imprinting on rubber gloves later preferred their own species.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what are the procedures, findings, and conclusions of Harlow’s animal research?

A
  • procedure = baby monkey’s given cloth or wire “mother” with feeding bottle attached.
  • findings = monkeys clung to cloth surrogate rather than wire one, regardless of which dispensed milk.
  • maternally deprived = monkeys grew up socially dysfunctional.
  • critical period = after 90 days, attachments would not form.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

evaluate Harlow’s animal research.

A
  • monkeys similar genetic makeup to humans, however not completely the same
  • theoretical value = demonstrated that attachment depends more on contact comfort than feeding.
  • practical value = Howe: informal understanding of risk factors in child abuse.
  • ethical issues = suffering of the monkeys would be human-like.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is classical conditioning?

A
  • caregiver (neutral stimulus) associated with food (unconditioned stimulus) which provokes an unconditioned response.
  • caregiver becomes a conditioned stimulus provoking a conditioned response.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what is operant conditioning?

A

crying behaviour reinforced positively for the infant (receives comfort) and negatively for the caregiver (has to provide comfort).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

how can attachment be a secondary drive?

A

through association with hunger.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

evaluate learning theory (classical conditioning and operant conditioning).

A
  • animal studies = Lorenz and Harlow showed that feeding is not the key to attachment.
  • human research = Schaffer and Emerson: most primary attachment figures were the mother, even if another carer did the feeding.
  • ignores other factors = cannot account for the importance of sensitivity and interactional synchrony.
20
Q

what is monotropy (Bowlby’s theory)?

A

-one particular attachment is different in quality and importance than others.

21
Q

what are social releasers and the critical period (Bowlby)?

A

-innate cute behaviours in the first two years.

22
Q

what is the internal working model? (Bowlby)

A

mental representations of the primary attachment relationship are templates for future relationships.

23
Q

evaluate Bowlby’s monotropic theory of attachment.

A

-mixed evidence = some babies formed multiple attachments without a primary attachment.
Suess: other attachments may contribute as much as primary ones.
-support for social releasers = Brazelton: when social releasers were ignored, babies became upset.
-support for internal working model = Bailey: quality of attachment is passed through generations in families.

24
Q

what are the procedures of Ainsworth’s strange situation?

A

-procedure = 7 stages controlled observation, assessed proximity seeking, exploration, secure base, stranger and separation anxiety and response to a reunion.

25
what are the findings of Ainsworth's strange situation?
-infants showed consistent patterns of attachment behaviour.
26
what are the conclusions of Ainsworth's strange situation?
- secure = enthusiastic greeting, generally content. (60-65%) - avoidant = avoids reunion, generally reduced responses (20-25%) - resistant = resists reunion, generally more distressed (3%).
27
evaluate Ainsworth's strange situation.
- support for validity = attachment types predict later social and personal behaviour e.g. bullying. - good reliability = different observers agree 90%+ of the time on children's attachment types. - culture-bound = attachment behaviour may mean different things in different cultures, so SS may be measuring different things.
28
what did van Ijzendoorn find in cultural variations?
- he compared rates of attachment in 8 different countries. | - found more variation within that than between countries (i.e. 75% secure in Britain, 50% secure in China).
29
what did Simonella and Jin find in their studies?
- Simonella = Italian attachment rates have changed, which may be due to changing practices. (50% secure, more mothers working). - Jin = Korean attachment rates similar to Japan, could be due to similar child-rearing styles. (more insecure)
30
what is the conclusion of cultural variation studies?
- attachment is innate and universal and secure attachment is the norm. - however, cultural practices can affect rates of attachment types.
31
evaluate cultural variation studies.
- large samples = reduces the impact of anomalous results in turn improving internal validity. - samples are unrepresentative of culture = countries do not equate to cultures, nor to culture-specific methods of child-rearing, lacks generalisability.
32
what is separation vs deprivation (Bowlby's theory of maternal deprivation)?
physical separation only leads to deprivation when the child loses emotional care.
33
what is the critical period (Bowlby: maternal deprivation)?
the first 30 months are critical and deprivation in this time can cause damage.
34
how can maternal deprivation affect development?
- Goldfarb: deprivation causes low IQ. | - Bowlby: emotional development e.g. affectionless psychopathy.
35
what were the findings of the 44 thieves study?
many more affectionless psychopaths than controls had prolonged deprivation.
36
evaluate Bowlby's maternal deprivation theory.
- evidence may be poor = orphans have experienced other traumas, Bowlby may be biased. - counter-evidence = Lewis: sample of 500, no link between early separation and later criminality. - sensitive period = Bowlbly exaggerated the importance of a critical period.
37
what happened in Rutter's ERA study?
- 165 orphans adopted in Britain. - Some of those adopted showed low IQ and dishibited attachment. (adopted at 6 months: IQ at 102. adopted at 6mths-2years: IQ at 86).
38
what happened in Bucharest's early intervention project?
- random allocation to institutional care or fostering. | - secure attachment in 19% of institutional group versus 74% of controls.
39
what are the effects of institutionalisation?
-disinhibited attachment and delay in intellectual developments if institutionalization is prolonged.
40
evaluate roman orphan studies and the effects of institutionalization.
- real-life application = both institutional care and adoption practice have been improved from research. - fewer extraneous variables = Romanian orphans had fewer negative influences before institutionalization than e.g. war orphans. - Romanian orphanages not typical = conditions were so bad that results may not generalise to better institutions.
41
how does the internal working model affect later relationships?
-Bowlby's idea that the primary attachment relationship provides a template for later relationships.
42
how does the internal working model affect relationships in later childhood?
- Kerns: securely attached children have better friendships. - Myron-Wilson and Smith: securely attached children less likely to be involved in bullying, avoidant = victims, resistant = bullies.
43
how does the internal working model affect romantic relationships?
- Mccarthy: securely attached adults have better relationships with partners and friends. - Hazan and Shaver: love quiz, 620 females respondents: 56% secure responders had better and longer-lasting relationships, 25% avoidant responders had a fear of intimacy.
44
how does the internal working model affect parental relationships?
-Bailey: 99 mothers' attachment type matched that of their mothers and babies.
45
evaluate the influence of early attachments on later relationships.
- evidence is mixed = Zimmerman: found little relationships between quality of attachment and later attachment. - low validity = most studies assess infant attachment by retrospective self-report which lacks validity. - association does not mean causality = a third factor like temperament might affect both infant attachment and later relationships.