Attachment Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is attachment?

A

A close two-way emotional bond between two people.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is reciprocity?

A

When each person responds to the other and seeks to elicit a response in the other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is interactional synchrony?

A

When the behaviours of a caregiver and infant mirror eachother.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Describe Schaffer and Emerson’s study on attachment

A

Schaffer and Emerson studied babies up to 18 months old. Mothers reported on the behaviour of their babies with themselves, strangers and other known adults. Schaffer and Emerson also observed the babies. They studied 60 infants from mainly working class families.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

From Schaffer and Emerson’s research, what are the 4 stages of attachment each baby passes through as they mature?

A
  • Asocial stage
  • Indiscriminate attachment
  • Specific attachment
  • Multiple attachments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Explain stage 1, Asocial stage.

A

Infants at 0-8 weeks old are asocial. Many kinds of stimuli, both social and non social, produce a favourable reaction such as a smile. They react similarly to humans and objects but happier in the presence of other humans.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explain stage 2, Indiscriminate Attachment.

A

Infants at 2-7 months have a clearer social behaviour by preferring people to objects and preferring familiar adults to strangers. Anyone can cuddle them and they do not show separation anxiety.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain stage 3, Specific attachment.

A

Infants at 7 months form a preference for one person (65% of the time this was the biological mother). They experience anxiety with strangers and separation anxiety from primary attachment figure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Explain stage 4, Multiple attachments.

A

Infants a month and onwards from stage 3 (around 8 months old), form secondary attachments to other adults with whom they have regular contact. By 18 months, almost all infants have formed multiple attachments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What were the findings of Schaffer and Emerson’s study?

A

Within one month of forming a primary attachment, 29% of infants had multiple attachments. By 1 year this had risen to the majority of infants having multiple attachments, 75% were to the father.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the strengths of Schaffer and Emerson’s study?

A

High ecological validity - babies were observed in their own homes.
Control of participant variables (high internal validity) - the same babies were observed at each stage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the limitations of Schaffer and Emerson’s study?

A
Lack of internal validity - babies in the asocial stage do not present much behaviour to be observed, so our assumption that we are measuring attachment may therefore be wrong.
Lack of internal validity - much of the data collected was based on mother's reports of their infants which may not be reliable as they may lie or be bias.
Findings lack generalisability - the participants were mainly working class mothers from Glasgow so not representative of the target population.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the role of the father?

A

The father is usually the secondary attachment figure and has the role to play with the child, stimulate and encourage exploration and risk taking through play.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the evolutionary explanation in attachment?

A

The tendency to form attachments is innate and is both present in infants and mothers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the Learning theory explanation in attachment?

A

Infants have no innate tendency to form attachments and they only learn attachments because of food.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How did Lorenz carry out his study?

A

In condition 1, Lorenz was the first thing that the goslings saw when they hatched in an incubator.
In condition 2, the goose mother was the first thing the goslings saw when they hatched in their natural environment.
The chicks were mixed up and released. Lorenz observed and recorded who the chicks followed and recorded their adult mating behaviour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What were the findings of Lorenz’s study?

A

Chicks in condition 1 followed Lorenz and did not mate with other geese as adults.
Chicks in condition 2 followed the goose mother and performed mating displays with other geese as adults.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What did Lorenz find was the critical period for imprinting for geese?

A

A few hours after hatching.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is the strength of Lorenz’s study?

A

Support from other research. Chicks imprinted on rubber gloves.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is the limitation of Lorenz’s study?

A

The animals under the study were birds. Cannot be directly linked to humans as human attachments are more emotional and complex than imprinting in birds.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What happened in Harlow’s study?

A

8 rhesus monkeys were separated from their mothers shortly after birth and they were kept in cages and studied for 165 days. Food was either available from a wire mother or cloth mother. The monkeys were also frightened to see who they ran to.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What were the findings of Harlow’s study?

A

All 8 monkeys spent most of their time on the cloth mother (around 18 hours a day). They only went to the wire mother for milk around 1 hour a day. They clung to the cloth mother when frightened. All the monkeys developed abnormally, they were frightened easily and could not make normal relationships.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What was the critical period for the monkeys in Harlow’s study?

A

3 months.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What are the strengths of Harlow’s research?

A

Supports Schaffer and Emerson’s findings of the idea of contact comfort rather than food.
Supports evidence for critical period.
Evidence for effect of early attachment on later relationships.
Has practical value for human health and social work, telling us about the importance of contact care.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What are the limitations of Harlow’s research?

A

There was a confounding variable that undermines the validity - the wire monkey did not really look like a monkey.
The study for monkeys may not be accurate for humans.
The monkeys experienced extreme suffering and lifelong difficulties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What are the 2 behavioural processes in Learning Theory of attachment?

A

Classical conditioning

Operant conditioning

27
Q

Describe Pavlov’s research into classical conditioning.

A
  • Pavlov established that meat caused the dog to salivate.
  • Meat was an unconditioned stimulus provoking an unconditioned response.
  • He established the tone did not cause the dog to salivate provoking no response.
  • He presented the tone with the meat - the dog salivates in response to the meat.
  • After a while, Pavlov found that the dog would salivate to the tone when it was presented.
  • The tone had become the conditioned stimulus and the conditioned response was salivation.
28
Q

What does operant conditioning involve?

A

Reinforcement

Punishment

29
Q

What are the two forms of reinforcement?

A

Positive reinforcement - rewards behaviour so that it is more likely to happen again.
Negative reinforcement - rewards behaviour by removing a negative consequence making it more likely that it will happen again.

30
Q

What is punishment?

A

Punishes a certain behaviour making it less likely that it will happen again.

31
Q

What are the features of Bowlby’s Monotropic Theory of attachment? (ASC-MI)

A
Adaptive
Social releasers
Critical period
Monotropy
Internal working model
32
Q

What are the 3 types of attachment?

A

Secure
Insecure-avoidant
Insecure-resistant

33
Q

Describe Ainsworth’s study on the ‘strange situation’.

A

100 middle class American 9-18 month old infant and their mothers in a controlled lab setting where researchers observed the infant’s behaviour.

34
Q

What are the stages of the strange situation experiment?

A

Observer takes mother and infant into room and then leaves.
Mother allows infant to explore.
Stranger enters room.
Mother leaves and stranger interacts with infant.
Mother returns and comforts baby and stranger leaves.
Mother leaves, baby is alone.
Stranger enters and interacts with baby.
Mother returns and picks up baby, stranger leaves.

35
Q

Describe the behaviour of securely attached infants.

A

High willingness to explore.
Moderate stranger anxiety.
Some separation anxiety.
Accepts comfort upon reunion.

36
Q

Describe the behaviour of insecure-avoidant infants.

A

High willingness to explore.
Low separation anxiety.
Indifferent stranger anxiety.
Avoids contact upon reunion.

37
Q

Describe the behaviour of insecure-resistant infants.

A

Low willingness to explore.
High stranger anxiety.
Distressed when separated.
Seeks and rejects comfort upon reunion.

38
Q

In Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenburg’s meta-analysis of the strange situation, what were significant about the results?

A

GB - highest rate of securely attached infants.
China - lowest rate of securely attached infants.
Germany - High level of insecure-avoidant infants.
Japan - High level of insecure-resistant infants.

39
Q

What conclusions can be made through Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenburg’s meta-analysis of the strange situation?

A

Provides evidence that culture affects the type of attachment behaviour an infants shows.

40
Q

What is separation?

A

Not being in the presence of the primary attachment figure.

41
Q

What is deprivation?

A

The emotional and intellectual consequence resulting from prolonged separation from the main attachment figure.

42
Q

What is privation?

A

The failure to develop any attachments during early life.

43
Q

What is the critical period of infants believed to be?

A

2 and a half years.

44
Q

Describe Bowlby’s 44 thieves study.

A

An opportunity sample of 44 thieves and 44 controls of children aged 5-16 and a mix of boys and girls were selected from the clinic where Bowlby worked at. Their IQ was tested and they and their parents were interviewed to record details of separation. They were also rated for affectionless psychopathy - having no affection for others or guilt of actions.

45
Q

What were the findings of Bowlby’s 44 thieves study?

A

19 children had experienced maternal deprivation.
12 of these were found to be affectionless psychopaths.
17 were thieves.
Only 2 were neither affectionless psychopaths nor thieves.

46
Q

What was the conclusion of Bowlby’s 44 thieves study?

A

Bowlby concluded that maternal deprivation in the child’s early life caused affectionless psychopathy, delinquency and low IQ.

47
Q

What are the limitations of Bowlby’s 44 thieves study?

A

The IV was having maternal deprivation or not, which wasn’t manipulated by the researchers. Therefore, Bowlby cannot show that it is maternal deprivation itself which causes poor outcomes, it could be another factor.
Mothers may lie or show social desirability bias and not accurately report that their child was left alone at one point.
Researcher bias - Bowlby may have picked specific participants or researchers discussed and shared information.

48
Q

How does Spitz’s study support Bowlby’s maternal deprivation theory?

A

37% of children without their mother died within two years, whereas all children with their mother in prison stayed alive. It suggests separation from mother causes poor outcomes for the children.

49
Q

What counter-evidence is there against Bowlby’s maternal deprivation theory?

A

Lewis - carried out a partial replication and found in her study prolonged early separation was not associated with criminality or social difficulties.
Koluchova’s case of study of brothers who were kept in a cupboard from age 1.5 to 7. After age 7 they were looked after by two adults and appeared to recover fully.
Rutter claimed Bowlby was muddling ‘deprivation’ and ‘privation’.

50
Q

Who were the participants of Rutter’s study of English Romanian Adoptees?

A

165 Romanian children who were adopted in the UK before the age of 3 1/2 years who all spent time in institutions.
Control group of 52 British children who had not lived in institutions who were adopted before 6 months of age.

51
Q

What were the children assessed for in Rutter’s ERA study?

A

Physical development - (height, weight, size of head, brain structure)
Cognitive development - (attention, language, IQ)
Attachment type

52
Q

What were the findings at adoption in Rutter’s ERA study?

A

Romanian orphans were smaller, weighed less and lagged behind British orphans on all measures.

53
Q

What were the findings at age 4 in Rutter’s ERA study?

A

Nearly all Romanian orphans who were adopted before 6 months caught up by age 4.

54
Q

What were the findings at age 11 in Rutter’s ERA study?

A
Romanian children showed better intellectual recovery the younger they were adopted.
IQ:
> 6 months: 102
6 months - 2 years: 86
After 2 years: 77
55
Q

What were the overall findings of Rutter’s ERA study?

A

Those adopted after 6 months were much more likely to show disinhibited attachment, autistic-like qualities and poor mental functions.
For some children, deprivation can be made up for to some extent by later good quality care whereas others will persist with difficulties.
In conclusion, no children over 6 months should be left in an institution.

56
Q

What were the findings of the Bucharest Early Intervention Project?

A

The study supported Rutter’s study
They found that children who stayed in institutions were severely impaired in IQ and showed a variety of social and emotional disorders.
The earlier an institutionalised child was placed into foster care, the better the recovery.

57
Q

How was the Bucharest Early Intervention Project carried out?

A

136 abandoned children were either assigned to foster care or stayed in the institution. A control group of 72 children raised by birth family was collected for comparison. Over a 12 year span, the groups were assessed for physical growth, cognitive functioning, brain development and social behaviour.

58
Q

What were the attachment findings of the Bucharest Early Intervention Project?

A

75% of the control group were securely attached.
19% of the institutionalised children were securely attached.
65% of the institutionalised children were disinhibitory attached.

59
Q

What were the strengths of the Bucharest Early Intervention Project?

A

It was randomised so it controlled for the appeal of the child; IQ, emotional development, agreeableness, social skills. Therefore it’s being in an institution that causes the poor outcomes.

60
Q

What are the confounding variables in Rutter’s ERA study?

A

Lack of nutrition

The ‘appeal of the child’

61
Q

What are the real life applications of Rutter’s ERA study?

A

Improvements have been made in the way children are cared for in the institutions.
EG. orphanages now have smaller numbers of caregivers for each child so an attachment can be made. This gives the chance for the child to develop normal attachments and help avoid disinhibited attachments.

62
Q

What is the Internal Working Model?

A

A special model for relationships. All the child’s future childhood and adult relationships will be based on the relationship with their primary attachment figure.

63
Q

What is Bowlby’s continuity hypothesis?

A

Attachment with parent
Relationship with peers
Later romantic and parenting relationships