Attachment. Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are the two forms of caregiver-infant interaction?

A

Reciprocity and interactional synchrony.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is reciprocity? Example.

A

This is a form of interaction between caregiver and the infant. Both parties are able to produce a response from the other. Smiling is an example when a smile occurs in the infant, it triggers a smile in the caregiver and vice versa.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Evaluation of reciprocity.

A

It involves the child’s physical, social and cognitive development. It becomes the basis for development of trust or mistrust. It shows how the child will relate to the world, learn, and form relationships throughout life.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is interactional synchrony?

A

Interactional synchrony is where an infant mirrors the actions of another person, for example, their facial expressions and body movements - moving their body in tune with the rhythm of their carer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Evaluation of interactional synchrony?

A

– What is being observed is merely hand movements or changes in expression. It is extremely difficult to be certain, based on these observations, what is taking place from the infant’s perspective. Is, for example, the infant’s imitation of adult signals conscious and deliberate?
This means that we cannot really know for certain that behaviors seen in mother-infant interaction have a special meaning.

+ Observations of mother-infant interactions are generally well-controlled procedures, with both mother and infant being filmed, often from multiple angles. This ensures that very fine details of behavior can be recorded and later analysed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did Shaffer and Emerson do?

A

They studied 60 infants from Glasgow at monthly intervals for the first 18 months of their life. This was a longitudinal study. They studied the child’s interactions with other people.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did Shaffer and Emerson develope due to their findings?

A

They found the four stages of attachment as an infant’s age increases.

  1. ASOCIAL STAGE – 0-6 weeks.
  2. INDISCRIMINATE ATTACHMENT – 6 weeks to 7 months.
  3. SPECIFIC ATTACHMENT – 7 to 9 months.
  4. MULTIPLE ATTACHMENTS – 10 months +
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Evaluation of Shaffer and Emerson.

A
\+ has a high ecological validity as it is a field observation and thus the behaviour of the child becomes more accurate due to the natural setting. 
-- biased sample as it was done in the 1960s from a working-class background and thus cannot be generalised - also has a western bias.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Explain the role of the Father in attachment.

A

There is now an expectation in western cultures that fathers should play a greater role in bringing up children than was previously the case. Also, the number of mothers working full time has increased in recent decades, and this has also led to fathers having a more active role.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is a difference between a mother and father in attachment and when is a child more likely to need their father or mother?

A

Mothers usually adopt a more caregiving and nurturing role compared to the father.
Whereas fathers adopt a more play-mate role than mothers. - more likely to encourage risk-taking behaviour.

Most infants prefer contact with their father when in a positive emotional state and wanting to play. In contrast most infants prefer contact with their mother when they are distressed and need comforting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Evaluation of the role of the father in attachment.

A

Numerous factors effect the father’s role and the impact he has on his child’s emotional development.

  1. cultural factors – until recently father’s were not meant to have an active role in their child’s development.
  2. social policy – in the UK not until last year father’s were not allowed to take paternity leave but now they are.
  3. Biological factors – men seem to lack emotional sensitivity when it comes to children, could be due to the lack of oestrogen.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the two animal studies for attachment?

A

Lorenz – imprinting and goslings

Harlow – ‘cupboard love vs comfort’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain Harlow’s rhesus monkey experiment procedure.

A

The procedure:
16 monkeys were separated from their mother’s at birth.
They were then placed in cages with access to two surrogate ‘mother’s’.
One mother was made of wire but had a feeding bottle attached; the other was covered with a cosy cloth but NO feeding bottle.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What did Harlow find out from his study?

A

He found that the monkeys spent most of their time with the cloth-covered monkey as they preferred comfort!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What were the long-lasting effects on Harlow’s monkeys? Part of the evaluation as well.

A

There were long-lasting effects on the monkeys (critical period):

  1. They were much more timid.
  2. They didn’t know how to act with other monkeys.
  3. They were easily bullied and wouldn’t stand up for themselves.
  4. They had difficulty with mating.
  5. The females were inadequate mothers.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Evaluation of Harlows research.

A

– There were long-lasting abnormal effects on the monkeys which harmed their future offspring. Once the females became parents they became neurotic - smashed their infants face into the ground.
+ He proved that comfort was more desired than ‘cupboard love’
– confounding variable( an outside influence that changes the accuracy of the DV.) - wire mothers had a different face that the comfort one.
– The whole study generalises the attachment of monkeys to humans which cannot be justified. It was also an ethical nightmare!
+ he did inspire the work of Bowlby though.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Explain Lorenz’ gosling imprinting experiment.

A

The Procedure:
He incubated half of the goose eggs, and the other half went back to a goose mother.
When the young goslings were hatching, Lorenz imitated a goose and became the first thing they heard and saw.
They began to follow Lorenz as the ‘mother goose’.

To ensure imprinting had occurred Lorenz put all the goslings together under an upturned box and allowed them to mix. When the box was removed the two groups separated to go to their respective ‘mothers’ - half to the goose, and half to Lorenz.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What did Lorenz find out from his study?

A

He found that geese follow the first moving thing they see during the critical period ( 12-17 hours after hatching)
This imprinting process suggests that attachment is innate and programmed genetically.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Evaluation of Lorenz’ study.

A

– Like Harlow, there were long-lasting effects on the goslings which came in the form of an irreversible sexual nature.
– Lorenz believed that imprinting could not be reversed, however modern research proves that it may be reversible -
+ Guiton et al (1966) disagreed with the irreversible nature of imprinting. They imprinted newly hatched chickens onto yellow rubber gloves. In later life, just as the theory predicts, they did indeed try to mate with the gloves. However, when they had chance to spend time with others of their own species, they developed a ‘taste’ for mating with these instead.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What are the two explanations of attachment?

A
Learning theory(classical and operant) 
Bowlby's monotropic theory.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Describe the learning theory for attachment.

A

This theory propses that all behaviours are learned rather than inherited.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is classical conditioning( part of the learning theory)? How it links to attachment.

A

A new conditioned response is learned through association between a neutral stimulus ( mother) and an unconditioned stimulus (food). The mother becomes the conditioned stimulus.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is operant conditioning( part of the learning theory)? How it links to attachment.

A

The reduction of discomfort created by hunger is rewarding, so food becomes a primary reinforcer - associated with mother who becomes a secondary reinforcer.

24
Q

Evaluation of the learning theory for attachment.

A

– animal studies lack external validity because it brings a simplified view of human attachment.
+ learning theory can explain some aspect of attachment such as attention and responsiveness.
–Harlow’s research suggested monkeys became attached to the soft surrogate mother rather than the one who fed it. This goes against the learning theory of attachment.
–Lorenz found goslings imprinted on the first moving object they saw which suggest attachment is innate and
not learnt.
–Schaffer and Emerson found less than half of infants had a primary attachment to the person who usually fed them.

25
Q

Describe Bowlby’s monotropic theory of attachment.

A

This suggests attachment is important for a child’s survival. Attachment behaviors in both babies and their caregivers have evolved through natural selection.This means infants are biologically programmed with innate behaviors that ensure that attachment occurs.

26
Q

What did Bowlby also come up with?

A

The critical period of attachment for infants - this is 3-6 months. After this it becomes increasingly difficult.

27
Q

What are the 6 features of his theory? Remember… ISSMIC.

A

Innate – natural instincts
Social releases – what an infant will do to get attention
eg crying.
Sensitive period – or called the ‘critical period’- a limited
time frame for attachment ~ up to 6
months.
Monotropy – primary attachment has a special emotional
role with the infant. (One main attachment
figure)
Internal working model – is a cognitive framework
comprising mental
representations for
understanding the world, self
and others.
Continuity hypothesis – acts as a template for future
relationships.

28
Q

Evaluation of Bowlby’s monotropic theory.

A

+lorenz supports Bowlby’s monotropic theory as the attachment process of imprinting is an innate process which has a critical period. Also, the geese also attached to a single person/animal or object, thus showing monotropic behavior.

  • -However, Rutter’s Romanian Orphan Study showed that attachments can form after the critical period.
    • attachment is adaptive and more complicated than what Bowlby suggests.
29
Q

Romanian orphan study = effects of institutionalisation. What did Rutter do?

A

Rutter studied 165 Romanian orphans.
He tested PHYSICAL, COGNITIVE and SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT.
They were compared with 60 british orphans.

30
Q

What did Rutter find from his study?

A

To start off with the RO lagged =behind their British counterparts.
Many of these RO were classed as ‘mentally retarded’.
At age 11, those children that were adopted before 6 months showed good recovery from what they had been through.
After 6 months = indiscriminate attachment. - attention seeking behavior towards all adults, lack of fear of strangers, inappropriate physical contact and had problems with peers.

31
Q

Evaluation of Rutter’s study.

A

– individual differences = some children recovered despite there being no attachments in the critical period.
+ Real-life application = adoption of children should be as early as possible to ensure that they become securely attached and are not affected in the long term.
+ It was a longitudinal study and thus showed that chnages take a while to happen = validity.

32
Q

The influence of early attachments on future relationships. Explain the internal working model =

A

According to Bowlby, early attachments influence the ability to form relationships later in adulthood. Bowlby suggested that the internal working model formed by a child becomes a template for future relationships and this predicts the continuity between early relationships with caregivers and later relationships in adulthood.

33
Q

Who did a key study on the the imact of early attachment on later relationships?

A

Hazan and Shaver.

34
Q

What did Hazan and Shaver do? imact of early attachment on later relationships

A

The researchers asked people to volunteer to take part in the study.
They were given 2 questionnaires, one to determine their early relationships with parents, the second their later, adult romantic attachments. They analysed 620 responses.

35
Q

What did Hazan and Shaver find out from their relationship quiz thingy?

A

There is a positive relationship between attachment type(childhood and current one) and their attitudes to love.
Those who were secure in early childhood and had a loving relationship with both parents had secure and stable relationships.
Whereas those who were avoidant had a cold and rejecting mother and where thus scared of intimacy.

36
Q

Evaluation of how our early attachments can have an effect on our future relationships.

A
    • Correlation does not always mean causation = internal working model may not have an effect on our later relationships.
    • it is overly deterministic = past attachment experiences do not always determine the course of future relationships.
37
Q

What are the 3 types of attachment founded by Ainsworth?

A

Secure
Insecure-resistant
Insecure-avoidant.

38
Q

What was the aim of Ainsworth and her ‘strange situation’ experiment?

A

It was a systematic test of an infants attachment to their caregiver in a situation of mild stress; to determine their attachment type.

39
Q

What was the procedure that Ainsworth implemented?

A

She used a structured observation to assess and measure the quality of an infants attachment type towards their caregiver.
Observations were made every 15 seconds of behaviours eg contact-seeking and contact-avoidance.

40
Q

What criteria did Ainsworth use to determine attachment type?

A

She used 4 criteria (separation/ stranger anxiety, reunion behaviour & willingness to explore the room) to classify 100 middle-class American infants into 1 of 3 categories. Children were observed through a one-way mirror and were classed as one of the 3 attachment types based on their responses to the 4 criteria.

41
Q

What were her basic finding eg percentages of each attachment group?

A
Secure = 70%
Insecure-avoidant = 15%
Insecure-resistant = 15%
42
Q

Describe the characteristics of a secure child based on the SS.

A
SECURE:
> willingness to explore = high 
> stranger anxiety = moderate 
> separation anxiety = moderate - easy to soothe
> reunion behaviour = enthusiaastic
43
Q

Describe the characteristics of an insecure-avoidant child based on the SS.

A
INSECURE-AVOIDANT:
> willingness to explore = high 
> stranger anxiety = low 
> separation anxiety = indifferent 
> reunion behaviour = avoids contact.
44
Q

Describe the characteristics of an insecure-resistant child based on the SS.

A
INSECURE-RESISTANT:
> willingness to explore = low
> stranger anxiety = high
> separation anxiety = distressed
> reunion behaviour = seeks and rejects.
45
Q

Evaluation of Ainsworth’s strange situation.

A

+ As the research is highly operationalised, observers have a clear view of how a securely attached infant should behave, due to the 4 specific criteria that Ainsworth used. For this reason, the research should have high inter-observer reliability & it is also replicable so its reliability can be checked.

    • One major weakness is that it has a low population validity. This is because her sample only included 100 middle-class Americans so her findings are unlikely to be generalised to a wider population. – also culturally bias.
    • a further classification group was found by Cassidy which was ‘disorganised’ so infants do not always fit into the categories.
46
Q

Who studied cultural variations in attachment?

A

Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonberg.

47
Q

What was the aim of Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonberg?

A

They used meta-analysis of 32 studies using the SS from 82 countries to identify whether patterns of attachments appear to be universal or are subject to cultural influences.

48
Q

What were the findings of Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonberg’s attachment study?

A

– Secure attachment was the norm in all of the countries studied.
– there was greater variation WITHIN countries than between them – linked to differences in socio-economic factors and levels of stress that varied between samples used within each country.
> Israel had the most insecure-resistant children.
> Germany had the most insecure-avoidant children.
> Great Britain had the most secure children!

49
Q

Evaluation of Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonberg’s attachment study?

A

+ meta-analysis includes very large samples of countries which in turn increases the validity of the study.

    • there is more variation within countries than between them, suggesting that the majority of cultural differences are actually in the country itself.
    • Simonelli looked at Italy and found that higher rates of insecure-avoidant were due to long working hours not their upbringing.
    • It is biased and ethnocentric(using your own culture as the standard by which to judge and evaluate other cultures) towards a western view. What we might describe as an avoidant child, may be seen as independent in Germany.
50
Q

What does Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation state?

A

Bowlby proposed that children need a warm, intimate and continuous relationship with a mother as it is necessary for healthly emotional development. Thus frequent/ prolonged separation from a mother during the critical period with have long-term consequences.

51
Q

What are the consequences of maternal deprivation? - separation from mother in the critical period.

A
  • -An inability to form attachments in the future (see the Internal Working Model)
  • -Affectionless psychopathy (inability to feel remorse)
  • -Delinquency (behavioural problems in adolescence)
  • -Problems with Cognitive Development
52
Q

What study did Bowlby do to test maternal deprivation?

A

Bowlby’s juvenile thieves.

53
Q

What/who did Bowlby study in his juvenile thieves study

A

He studied 88 children who were emotionally maladjusted. 44 of these children were thieves( compared with 44 non thieves – bowlby suggested that these thieves were ‘emotionless psychopaths’

54
Q

What did Bowlby find from his juvenile thieves study?

A

He found 86% of the affectionless psychopaths(the actual thieves) had suffered through frequent separation before the age of two, during the critical period. He proved that disrupted attachment in early life is linked to crime and emotional maladjustment.

55
Q

Evaluation of Bowlby’s juvenile thieves study?

A

+ it has major practical applications and real world applications - highlight the importance of positive attachment experiences and maintaining a mono tropic bond in the first five years, which have been instrumental in the developments of good childcare practices.
+ Furthermore Sweden offers 480 days parental leave, clearly highlighting its commitment to support children’s early attachment experiences.
– Retroactive recall may be innacurate - Bowlby was asking the adolescent participants to recall separations that they had experienced years earlier, their responses would have been subject to inaccuracies/ distortions.
–Oversimplified concept - Rutter’s re-assessed and critiqued Bowlby’s concept of maternal deprivation. Rutter argues that Bowlby failed to distinguish between separation from an attachment figure, loss of an attachment figure and a complete lack of attachment (privation). Rutter argues that the three circumstances have different long-term effects on which Bowlby overlooked.