Attachment Flashcards
Classical Conditioning in the Learning Theory of Attachment
Food serves as a UCS which gives a feeling of pleasure (UCR)
Caregiver starts as NS- child hasn’t learned to react in any way
When same caregiver provides food over a long time, caregiver becomes associated with food
After learning, the mother starts producing the same response of pleasure by themselves
Baby has become attached to the caregiver
Operant Conditioning in the Learning Theory of Attachment
Hunger acts as a drive- this causes babies to engage in behaviour to reduce the drive
This leads to the child being fed- reduces hunger therefore reducing the drive
Food is a reward- primary reinforcer
Child recognises person provides the food as secondary reinforcer
Process repeats and child becomes attached as mother is source of reward and agent of drive reduction
Drive
A feeling of discomfort that motivates behaviour
Primary Reinforcer
Object that directly reduces the drive
Secondary Reinforcer
Agent that provides primary reinforcer, indirectly reducing drive
Strengths of Learning Theory of Attachment
Practical Applications
Weaknesses of the Learning Theory of Attachmenr
Refuting evidence of animal research- Lorenz and Harlow
Refuting evidence from human research- Schaffer and Emerson
Alternative explanations- Bowlby
Adaptive Stage of Monotropic Theory
Attachment has evolutionary value- survival function for infants
Infants- enhances chances of survival
Caregivers- ensures their genes are successfully passed down
Critical Period of Monotropic Theory
Due to survival value of attachment, infants have innate drive to form attachments
Critical periods- first 2 years of life
Children who don’t from attachments during the CP, they will have trouble forming attachments in future.
Social Releasers of Monotropic Theory
During critical period, attachment is determined by parental sensitivity to social releasers
These are behaviours (smiling, cooing) that elicit caregiving type of responses from caregivers
Tendency to demonstrate social releasers is innate and helps capture attention of carers
Montropy in Monotropic Theory
Based on parental sensitivity to SRs during CP, infants for one special, emotional bond (primary attachment)
Tendency to form one important attachment- Monotropy
Often the biological mother
Internal Working Model in Monotropic Theory
Monotropic attachment formed in CP forms a template for future relationships
Infants will form a concept of what to expect from future intimate relationships
Continuity Hypothesis- those who have secure attachments in infancy continue to be more socially and emotionally competent and have secure relationships
Strengths of Monotropic Theory
Support for Continuity Hypothesis- Sroufe et al
Practical Applications
Weaknesses of Monotropic Theory
Refuting evidence of concept of critical period-Tizard and Hodges
Refuting evidence for the concept of Monotropy- Schaffer and Emerson
Procedure for Lorenz’s Goslings
Took a clutch of goose eggs and divided them into 2 conditions: control group (stayed with the mother) and experimental group ( is incubated )
When the incubated group hatched the first thing they saw and had contact with was Lorenz
He then observed the behaviour of the goslings as he interacted with them
Findings for Lorenz’s Goslings
Incubated group followed Lorenz everywhere (control followed mother goose)
IG didn’t recognise the mother
Young animals will form an attachment to a moving object in its critical period (2 days)- lack of that object leads to failure to form primary attachments
Animals will choose to mate with the same species they were imprinted
Conclusion of Lorenz’s Goslings
Animals form attachments through imprinting and have an evolutionary need to form attachments to enhance survival chances
Procedure of Harlow’s Monkeys
Places monkeys (in isolation for 8 months) in a cage with 2 surrogate mothers
One was made of wire with monkey like head that dispenses food and the other was a wooden block covered in cloth that provided comfort
Findings of Harlow’s Monkeys (during experiment)
Baby monkeys spent more time with cloth mother than wire mother
When they were frightened they always went to the cloth mother
Findings of Harlow’s Monkeys (during follow-up)
Monkeys developed abnormally even with contact comfort
Abnormal social interactions and mating behaviours towards other monkeys
This was due to not forming healthy attachments during their CP (90 days)
Conclusion of Harlow’s Monkeys
Food doesn’t lead to attachment
Contact comfort and social interactions are key factors in attachments
Theory that attachments is based on food is too simplistic
Strengths of Animal Research
Research support for imprinting- Guiton
Weaknesses of Animal Research
Problems extrapolating to humans
Imprinting effects are not permanent- Guiton
Ethical issues- Harlow
Reason animal research has implications for human attachment
Evidence surrounding critical period a limited window
Evidence surrounding the importance of contact comfort
Showed damaging effects of poor early attachments
Reasons animal research is irrelevant to human attachments
Problems with extrapolation
Idea of critical period not being relevant to humans
Attachment
A strong,enduring, emotional relationship between two people
Two way process characterised by a drive for closeness and feeling of security in the presence of attachment figure