Attachment Flashcards
Define attachment
A close two-way emotional bond between two individuals in which each individual sees the other as essential for their own emotional security.
How can we recognise attachment?
When people display the following behaviours:
-Proximity: people try to stay physically close to whom they are attached
-Separation distress: distressed when attachment figure leaves their presence
-secure-base behaviour: tend to make regular contact with their attachment figure even when they are independent from them
-reunion behaviour: people tend to respond emotionally when reunited to those they are most attached with
define interactional synchrony
when an infant and caregiver interact, they tend to mirror what the other one is doing in terms of their facial and body movements. Adults and babies respond in time to sustain communication
Define reciprocity
caregiver/infant interaction is a two-way mutual process; each party responds to the others signals to sustain communication (turn-taking). The behaviour from each party elicits a response from the other.
Interactional synchrony study A01:
-who
-aim
-method
-Meltzoff and Moore (1977)
-To investigate how early infants are able to mirror adults
-six infants age 12-21 days were each shown three facial gestures (e.g. smiling) and one manual gesture (e.g. raising hand), sequentially. Responses were videotaped and scored by observers who did not know which gesture the infant had seen the adult do
Interactional synchrony study A01:
-results
-conclusion
-infants of this young age were able to mirror all four gestures
-Suggests that synchronised behaviours are innate
Reciprocity study A01:
-who
-method
-Brazleton et al (1974)
-12 mother-infant pairs who were seen repeatedly over the infants first five months of life
-During each videotaped and coded session, mothers would come from behind a curtain to play (using lots of positive facial expressions) with their infant for three minutes. they would then leave and recording continued for another 30 seconds whilst infant was alone. Mother then returned for another 3 minute face-to-face interaction. They were sometimes instructed to present a still, unresponsive face.
Reciprocity study A01:
-results
-when mothers carried out f2f interaction, babies moved their bodies in smooth, circular patterns and looked frequently at their mothers.
-When mothers stopped responding to them their movements became jerky and they averted their gaze, followed by a short period of attempting to get their mothers attention, until finally they curled up and lay motionless
-Suggest reciprocal actions are crucial to attachment formation
Evaluation of infant-caregiver interactions: plan (other than research support)
(+)Practical applications- antenatal classes
(-)Low population validity
(+)Well controlled procedures
(-)Problems with testing infants behaviour
Evaluation of infant-caregiver interactions (ICI)
(+)Practical applications
Research into ICI has led to successful PA such as antenatal classes. Professionals involved in prenatal and neonatal care and pregnancy encourage parents to interact with their babies. This aid healthy attachment formation in childhood which often continues throughout life and extends to later relationships. This reduces welfare and social services benefits and MH care costs to NHS as individuals will be more likely to be happier, typically functioning adults. Strength as this is a valuable contribution to society and helps reduce the costs of social services.
Evaluation of infant-caregiver interactions
(-)Low population validity
Meltzoff and Moore’s study consisted of six infants and Brazelton et al studied 12 mother-infant pairs. These are both very small sample sizes and may not be representative of all infants. Limitation because findings about caregiver-infant interactions may be difficult to generalise to other infants (low external). In addition, because of small sample conclusions drawn about imitation/reciprocity may not be valid. Therefore, this reduces the validity of the claim caregivers and infants communicate via interactional synchrony and reciprocity.
evaluation of infant-caregiver interaction
(+)well controlled procedures
Research is controlled observation and therefore is a highly controlled procedure. the interactions are filmed from different angles. Means that very fine details can be recorded and analysed later. Strength of research into caregiver-infant interactions because several researchers can re-watch video clips as many times as necessary to ensure that all behaviours are recorded. Therefore, these findings about caregiver-infant interactions have high internal validity.
Evaluation of caregiver-infant interaction
(-)Problems with testing infants behaviour
difficult to test and is open to observer bias. Infant’s mouths are fairly constant in motion and the expressions that are tested occur frequently by chance (tongue sticking out and smiling). Limitation as it makes it difficult to distinguish between general activity and specific behaviours (synchronised or reciprocal), and as a result there is a great deal of interpretation of what babies are actually doing. Therefore, the findings about caregiver-infant interactions may not be valid.
Evaluation of caregiver-infant interaction
(-)Problems with testing infants behaviour (contradiction)
However, Meltzoff and Moore overcome this issue by filming infants responses then asking an observer to judge the infants behaviour from the video. The person judging was not made aware of the behaviour being imitated - they didn’t see the behaviour of the adult on that of the infant. This technique increased the internal validity of their findings, which in turn strengthens the validity of the claim that infants do imitate caregivers’ behaviour.
What are the four stages of attachment?
Stage 1: Asocial
Stage 2: Indiscriminate attachment
Stage 3: Specific attachment
Stage 4: Multiple attachment
Outline Schaffer’s fist stage of attachment
This stages occurs in the babies first few weeks. In this stage their behaviour towards humans and non-human objects is quite similar
Outline Schaffer’s second stage of attachment
2-7months. Now show a preference for humans over inanimate objects and prefer familiar people, this is the beginning of attachment formation. However, they will accept attention and affection from all adults equally
Outline Schaffer’s second stage of attachment
from 7months. Both stranger and separation anxiety occur. Babies will have formed a specific attachment which in 65% of cases is the mother yet is mainly based on reciprocity
Outline Schaffer’s fourth stage of attachment
8-12 months. Babies begin to form multiple attachments too those other than their primary attachment figure (secondary attachments)
Key study: stage of attachment
-who
-method
Schaffer and Emerson
-60 babies from working class families based in Glasgow. The babies and mother were visited every month for their first year and again at 18 months. the mother were asked questions about their babies reactions when they were separated from them (separation anxiety) and when there was a stranger present (stranger anxiety)
Key study: stages of attachment
-findings
By 6-8 months most babies started to show separation anxiety from their attachment figure indicating that an attachment had been formed
-65% mother
-3% fathers
-27% joint
By 18 months around 87% had at least 2 attachment, whereas 31% were attached to 5 or more people (multiple attachment)
Evaluation of the stages of attachment (plan)
(+)Supported by research
(+)Longitudinal
Counter - low external validity (population validity)
(-)Self-report
(-)Cultural bias
Evaluation of the stages of attachment
(+)Supported by research
Schaffer and Emerson studied 60 babies from working class families in Glasgow. Researchers visited M and B at home every month for first year and again at 18 months. They found that by 6-8 months babies started to show separation anxiety from their attachment figure. By 18 months 87% of babies had at least two attachments. This is a strength because the babies did demonstrate the attachment behaviours associated with each stage and therefore demonstrate the theory’s claims are valid
Evaluation of the stage of attachment
(+)Longitudinal
a strength is that it was carried out longitudinally (over 18 months). the same children were followed up and observed regularly (as opposed to observing different children of varying ages at the same time - which would have led to individual differences). strength because the study doesn’t have the issue of individual difference between the ptps acting as confounding variables and therefore the findings have internal validity.