Attachment Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Caregiver-infant interactions-
One strength?

A

FILMED OBSERVATIONS (LAB). Other things that may distract a baby can be controlled. The observations can be recorded and analysed. So unlikely that researchers will miss nay details, a high inter-rather reliability can be established. No demand characteristics as there infants do not know they are being observed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Caregiver-infant interactions-
Two limitations?

A

DIFFICULTY OBSERVING INFANTS. Young babies lack co-ordination. The behaviours that are being observed are ones like simple hand movements, and subtle changes in expression. (Can’t tell if an infant is just smiling or passing wind.) so we find it difficult to know what is occurring form a babies perspective.

DEVELOPMENTAL IMPORTANCE. Feldman (2012), states things like synchrony, also reciprocity, are just names given to observable behaviour. So cannot be useful in understanding child development, as it does not tell us the purposes of these behaviours.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Schaffers stages of attachment-
Two strengths?

A

GOOD EXTERNAL VALIDITY. Most of the observations were made by the parents within the study, they did not observe stranger anxiety. This means the babies wouldn’t have been distracted by the presence of a researcher.

REAL WORLD APPLICATION. In the asocial stage and the indiscriminate stage daycare is likely to be straightforward, the s=research shows that starting daycare during th specific attachment stage could be problematic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Schaffers stages of attachment-
One limitation?

A

POOR EVIDENCE FOR HTE ASOCIAL STAGE. Young babies have poor co-ordination, and are family immobile. Babies may find it hard to display things such as anxiety, so we may not notice it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The role of the father-
One strength?

A

REAL WORLD APPLICATION. Parents sometimes agonise over who should take on the primary caregiver role. Mothers ,say feel pressured to do so, fathers ,at feel pressured to work. The research can be used to offer advice to future parents.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The role of the father-
Two limitation?

A

CONFUSION OVER RESEARCH QUESTION. ‘What is ht role of the father?’ Is a much more complicated question than we think. Some wan to research as secondary attachment figures, but some were concerned as primary attachment figures. Research shows fathers can take on a maternal role, and some research shows fathers as behaving differently.

CONFLICTING EVIDENCE. Grossman et al, suggested that fathers as secondary attachment figures have an important and different role in their child development (play and stimulation). However, if fathers have a distinctly and important role we would expect that children with a single mother and lesbian parent families would turn out in some way different from those in two parent, heterosexual-sexual households. McCallum and Golombok (2004), showed these children do not develop differently.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Animal studies of attachment- L-
One strength?

A

RESEARCH SUPPORT. Regolin and Vallortigara (1995), supports Lorenz idea of imprinting. Chicks were shown simple snake combinations, when they are moved in front of them, they followed the original most closely.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Animal studies of attachment- L-
One limitation?

A

LACK OF GENERALISABILITY TO HUMANS. The mammal attachment system is quite different and more complex than birds. In mammas, attachment is a two way process, so it is not just the young who becomes attached.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Animal studies of attachment- H-
One strength?

A

REAL WORLD VALUE. Helped social workers, and psychologists understand that a lack of bonding experience may be a risk factor in child development, allowing them to intervene to prevent poor outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Animal studies of attachment- H-
One limitation?

A

LACK OF GENERALISABILITY TO HUMANS. Monkeys are much more similar to humans than Lorenz birds, and all mammals have some kind of attachment behaviours. However, the human brain and human behaviours are still more complex.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

EoA- learning theory-
One strength?

A

SOME CONDITIONING MAY BE INVOLVED. Unlikely that food plays a central role in attachment, but conditioning may still play a role. For example, a baby may associate the feeling of being warm and comfortable with an individual, and this may influence the infants choice of of their primary attachment figure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

EoA- learning theory-
Two limitations?

A

COUNTER EVIDENCE FROM ANIMAL STUDIES. Lorenz geese, imprinted on the first thing that hey saw after they were born, regardless of whether they were associated with food. If we consider Harlows research with monkeys, they displayed an attachment towards the mother who was soft, not the one who fed the,.

COUNTER EVIDENCE FTOM HUMAN STUDIES. Schaffer and Emerson (1964), infants tended to form their main attachment to their mother, regardless of who feeds them. Isabella (1989), found high levels if interactional synchrony predicted the quality of attachment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Types of attachment-
Two strengths?

A

GOOD PREDICTIVE VALIDITY. Secure attachments have the best outcomes than others. This includes better achievement in school and less involvement in bullying (McCormick (2016)). Secure babies tend to have better mental health in adult hood (Ward (2006)). Insecure resistant gas the worst outcome.

GOOD RELIABILITY. Bick (2012), tested the inter-rather reliability. They found agreement on attachment type in 94% of cases. Because of controlled conditions, and because proximity seeking and stronger anxiety, involves big movements, which are easy to observe.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Types of attachment-
One limitation?

A

THE TEST MAY BE CULTURE BOUND. This was developed in Britain and the US. The strange situation may only be valid in certain cultures. The Japanese study by Takahashi (1986), displayed high levels of separation anxiety and so a disproportionate amount are classed as insecure-resistant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Cultural variations in attachment-
One strength?

A

INDIGENOUS RESEARCHERS. (IR= same culture as the researchers) Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg, included research form german and Japanese researchers (Grossman (1981), and Takahashi (1986)). Many of the potential problems within cross cultural research, are not concerns. No misunderstandings or language barriers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Cultural variations in attachment-
Two limitations?

A

CONFOUNDING VARIABLES. Studied conducted in different cultures are not always conducted within the same methodologies, when they are reviewed within different meta analysis. Characteristics such as poverty, social class, and urban.rural makeup can confound results, also things such as age. Environmental variables may also be different (the size of the room, tha availability of interesting toys).

IMPOSED ETIC. Cross cultural reaserach includes ideas of emic (cultural uniqueness). Imposed etic occurs when we assume techniques that work in one cultural contex will work in another. An example of babies response to reunion in the strange situation. In the US, lack of affection - avoidant. Whereas in germany this woudl be considered independant

17
Q

Bowlbys theory of maternal deprivation-
Three limitations?

A

FLAWED EVIDENCE. 44 thieves study is flawed as Bowlby carried our both the family interviews and th assessment for APD. This left Bowlby open to bias, as he knew in advance which individuals he would like to show AP. This study was also influenced by Goldfarbs (1943) study, which was subject to confounding variables, as these children had experiences institutionalisation and separation form primary caregiver.

DEPRIVATION AND PRIVATION. Rutter (1981), drew a distinction between two early kind of separation. Deprivation refers to the loss of the primary attachment figure, after attachment has been developed. Privation refers to the failure to form an attachment in the first place. He suggested the long term effects Bowlby said were because of deprivation, were most likely due to privation.

CRITICAL VS SENSITIVE PERIODS. Bowlby stated that damage was inevitable if an attachment has not been formed in the first two and a half years. However in many cases, the effects can be solved with aftercare. Koluchova (1976), reported the case of the Czech twins, they had severe physical and emotional abuse from 19 months to 7 years. They recieved excellent care, and by teens they had fully recovered.

18
Q

Romanian orphan studies-
Two strengths?

A

REAL WORLD APPLICATION. Langdon (2006), helps psychologists understand the effect of institutionalisation, and how to prevent the worst effects. Led to improved conditions, for example, key workers, instead of lots of different careers.

FEWER CONFOUNDING VARIABLES. Before the romain orphans were studied, the only orphans which were studied were ones from world war 2. These children had also experience trauma, which acted as a confounding variable. The Romanian orphans were only given away because the parents could not afford to look after them.

19
Q

Romanian orphan studies-
One limitation?

A

LACK OF ADULT DATA. Data form the last ERA study, looked at children up until their salty or mid 20s. So we do not have the most interesting research questions about long term effects, the findings all state they they have long term mental health problems, and struggle to maintain all kinds of relationships. This information will take a long time to gather, due to the fact that they are longitudinal studies.

20
Q

Influence of early attachment on later relationships-
One strength?

A

RESEARCH SUPPORT. Reviews research into attachment type and later development. Fear man and Roisaman (2017), early attachment consistently predicts later attachment, emotional well-being and attachment to their own children. Disorganised attachment is strongly slated with later mental disorders.

21
Q

Influence of early attachment on later relationships-
Two limitations?

A

VALIDITY ISSUES WITH RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES. Most of these studies are not longitudinal. Instead researchers typically ask questions about their relationship with their parents, and identify attachment type form this. This causes two validity types, relies on honesty and accuracy form participants. Second is it is ahrd to assess what they are assessing is early attachment or adult attachment.

CONFOUNDING VARIABLES. McCarthy, assessed attachment in infancy, which means early attachment assessing is valid. Association between attachment quality and later development may be changed by confounding variables. Parent style may influence both both attachment quality and later development.

22
Q

EoA- Bowlby’s monotropic theory-
Two strengths?

A

SUPPORT FOR SOCIAL RELEASERS. Brazelton (1975), observed that babies trigger interactions with adults using social releasers. The researcher instructed the primary caregivers to ignore the babies social releasers. Babies became increasingly distressed, and some eventually curled up and lay motionless.

SUPPORT FOR INTERNAL WORKING MODEL. IWM predicts the patterns of attachment, they will be passed from one generation to the next. Bailey (2007), assessed 99 mothers and their 1 year old babies. They also assessed the mothers attachment to their own primary caregiver. Found mothers with a poor attachment with their own parents then their attachment with their child was also poor.

23
Q

EoA- Bowlby’s monotropic theory-
One limitation?

A

VALIDITY OF MONOTROPHY WAS CHALLENGED. Schaffer and Emerson (1964), although most babies did attach to one individual at first, a significant minority found multiple attachments at the same time. The first attachment has a stronger effect on attachment not a different effect.