Attachment Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Caregiver-Infant Interactions

A

Seek proximity
Distress of seperated
Pleasure when reunited
General Orientation (Independency)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Caregiver-Infant Interactions:
Interactional Synchrony

A

Mirroring of micro-level behaviour and emotions.
Is important for development of attachment, higher synchrony = higher quality attachment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Caregiver-Infant Interactions: Reciprocity

A

From three months.
Each person reponds to the other.
Involes close attention to behaviour and happens when the baby is active.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Caregiver-Infant Interactions: AO3

A

May not be reliable to study children.
Hard to know what is actually happening when observing. Conscious or deliberate, or by chance - reduces validity?

Methodological problems: possibility of observer bias, more than one observer to examine inter-observer reliability.

Socially Sensitive: children may be disadvantaged, mother who return to work.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Stages of attchment:

A

1) Indiscriminate Attachment - 2 months
2) Beginnings of attachment - 2-7 months
3) Discriminate Attachment - 7-9 months
4) Multiple Attachments - 9+ months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Stages of attachment: Key study

A

Schaffer and Emerson - Glasgow study.

Studied 60 infants, from 5-23 weeks old for year. Checking every four weeks and reported infant’s response to 7 everyday situations.

Found quality is more important than time. 65% first specific attachment was mother. (Stage 3)

1 month after first attachment, 29% of infants had multiple attachments - secondary attachments. By 1, majority had.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Schaffer and Emerson AO3

A

Sample bias - may not apply to other social groups, temporal validty: different in 60s.

Stage theories suggest inflexible and fixed development of attachment. Standardised = abnormal.

Culture bias - collectivist cultures focus on group so more likely to form multipe attachments earlier. Imposed etic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Role of the father.

A

Only 3% of infants had father has first specific attachment. 75% eventually form secondary attachments with father.
Farther’s play is important, more to do with play and stimulation than nurturing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Role of father AO3

A

Important economic implications - mothers may feel less pressure.

Undermining evidence - single or same sex marriages don’t develop differently. McCallum 2004.

Unclear nature vs. nurture. Soical biases or hormonal biological factors?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Animal Studies: Lorenz

A

Divided gosling eggs into two groups, one with natural mother, other in incubator and first thing they saw was Lorenz. Goslings started to follow around. To test the effect of imprinting Lorenz marked goslings and returned them to mother.
Showed no sign of recognising mother and continued to follow Lorenz. Concluded imprinting has to happen in a criticial period (up to 2 days).
Imprinting is irreversible and long lasting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Imprinting

A

The innate readiness to develop a strong bond with attachmnet figure which takes place in a specific time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Animal Studies: Harlow

A

Two wire monkeys. One bare wire, other in soft cloth. 8 monkeys studied for 165 days. Milk bottle placed on different mother for two groups of 4 monkeys. Time spent with each mother was measured and responses when frightened.
All monkeys spent most the time with the soft cloth wire mother, regardless of feeding bottle. All clung to soft mother whem frightened.
Suggest infants form attachments with person offering comfort rather than person feeding.
Grew up to be socially and sexually abnormal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Animal Studies AO3

A

Lorenz supporting evidence - Guiton (1966), chicks + gloves used to feed. MIAD - characteristics of imprinting, more forgiving, reverible.

Cannot be generalised to humans.

Unethical.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explanations of attachment: The leanring theory of attachment

A

Suggest attachment behaviour is learned through either classical or operant conditioning.
Mother = conditioned stimulus
Mother = secondary reinforcer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explanations of attachment: The learning theory of attachment AO3

A

Harlow - contact may be more important than food. MIAD - inferred from animal studies.

Schaffer and Emerson reported attachments to those not involved in basic care.

Envrionmentally reductionist - attachment behaviour is complex, disregards parenting style, temperament.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Explanations of attachment: Bowlby’s monotropic theory of attachment

A

Evolutionary theory.
Attachments are adaptive, meaning they give us a adaptive advantage to survival.
Attachment to caregiveer ensures shelter, food and warmth.
Babies have social releasers which ‘unlock’ adults innate tendency to care for them, e.g. physical ‘cuteness’ and behavioural.
Has to form during critical period between birth + 2.5 years old. If not. long term damage - socially, emotionally, intellectually.
Monotropy - form one special attachment to mother.
Through monotopic attachment, infant forms a interal working model which a special mental schema that all future relationships will be based on.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Explanations of attachment: Bowlby’s monotropic theory of attachment AO3

A

Schaffer and Emerson - multiple attachments - contradicatory evidence.

Econominc implications - role of fathers, mothers and employment.

Ethnocentrism - collectiviest cultures - imposed etic.

18
Q

Types of attachment

A

Insecure Avoidant - Type A
Insecure Resistant - Type C
Secure Attachment - Type B

19
Q

Ainsworth’s strange situation episodes

A

Parent and infant play

Parent sits while infants plays - willingness to explore

Stranger enters - stranger anxiety

Parent leaves - seperation anxiety

Parent returns, stranger leaves - reunion behaviour

Parent leaves infant alone - seperation anxiety

Stranger enters - stranger enxiety

Parent returns - reunion behaviour

20
Q

Type B Attachment characteristics

A

Moderate to high willingness to explore
Moderate stranger anxiety (wary)
Moderate seperation anxiety (upset)
Glad at reunion
60% of attachments

21
Q

Type A Attachment characteristics

A

High willingness to explore (independent)
Low stranger anxiety (avoidant)
Low seperation anxiety (unconcerned)
Indifferent at reunion
22% of attachments

22
Q

Type C Attachment characteristics

A

Insecure Resistant
Low willingess to explore
High stranger anxiety
High Seperation anxiety
Conflicted at reunion, seeks but rejects affection
12% of attachments

23
Q

Strange Situation - AO3

A

Ethnocentric - based in US attachment value. E.g. Japanese judged according to US standards, resistant attachment more common.

High population validity, 100 participants of both genders, MIAD - demand characteristics of mother + low ecological validity.

Potentailly unethical - although it followed the ethical guidelines, infants were repeatedly exposed to distresss.

24
Q

Cultural Variations in Attachment: Key Study

A

Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg.

meta-analysis of 32 studies, over 200 strange situation classification over 8 countries. Interested in whether inter+intra-cultural differences.

Little difference, secures attachment always most common. Variation within cultures was 1.5x greater than between.

Support ides that attachment is a innate process.

24
Q

Cultural Variationsn AO3

A

Confounding Variables, assumed quality of attachment mosty important, temperament more important (Kagan 1982), maybe be measuring differences in temperament.

Supporting study - (Tronick 1992) Studied african tribe, infants were cared for and even breastfed by different women. At 6 months still one primary attachment.

Disgards the notion of cultural emics by imposing the etic of western infant experiences onto other cultural. Collectivists (Japan) high levels of insecure resistant, my show distress to unusual situation rather than attachment type behaviour.

25
Q

Bowlby’s Theory of Maternal Deprivation

A

Proposed prolonged emtional deprivation would have long-term consequences in emotional develoment.
Value of maternal care:
‘warm, intimate and continuous relationship’
Critical Period:
2.5-5 years
Frequent or prolonged seperation = emotionally disturbed
Long-term consequences:
Delinquency
Reduced Intelligence
Increased Aggression
Depression
Affectionless Psychopathy

26
Q

Bowlby’s Key Study

A

44 Juvenile Thieves
Procedure:
44 Juvenile theifs vs 44 Juvenile non-theifs.
Via interviews + Quesionaires

Findings:
17/44 had prolonged seperation beofre 5
15/17 were affectionless psychopaths
2/44 non-theifs has such seperation
Supports - link between seperation later maladjustment

27
Q

Bowlby’s Theory of Maternal Deprivation AO3

A

Fails to seperate out factors - Rutter (1972), different types of seperation = different long-term consequences.

Practial Applications - importance of monotropic attachment. Childcare practices = caregivers +improved visiting hours. Parental leave = Sweden 480.

Gender Bias - women should stay at home rather than pursue career opportunities or detrimental effect on child. Feminsim.

28
Q

Effects of institutionalisation: Key Study

A

Rutter + Songua-Barke (2010)
Followed 165 Romanian orphans who spent their early lives in Romanian institutions.
111 adopted by 2
54 by 4
Adoptees tested at regular intervals (4,6,11,15) to assess physical, cognitive + social development via interviews.
Compared to control group of 52 British adoptees all before 6 months.

29
Q

Effects of institutionalisation: Key Study Findings

A

Rutter + Songua-Barke (2010)
Romanian orphans lagged behind Brisish controll group on all measures of physical, cognitive + social developement.
By 4 some of the Romanian children had caught up with Britsh children.
Follow ups confirm that significant deficits remain in children who remained in institutional care beyond 6 months - problems with peer relationships and disinhibited attachments.

Long-term consequences may be less servere than once thought is children have opportunity to form attachment.

30
Q

Effects of Institutionalisation

A

Disinhibited Attachment
Reactive Attachment Disorder
Intellectual Disability
Difficulty forming attachments

31
Q

Disinhibited Attachment

A

Effect of Institutionalisation.
equally friendly and affectionate to people they know well and who are strangers. Unusual behaviour as infants normally show stranger anxiety.

32
Q

Intellectual Disability (ID)

A

Effect of Institutionalisation.
Generalised Neurodevelopmental disorder characterised by significantly impaired intellectual and adaptive functioning.
Defined by an IQ below 70 and deficits in two or more adaptive behaviours that affect everyday life.
Most orphans showed sign of ID when arriving in Britain, however most caught up with control group - suggesting damage can be recovered.

33
Q

Reactive Attachment Disorder

A

Effect of Institutionalisation.
Unable to give and receive attention.
Cruelty to others, especially pets.
Difficulty in holding eye contact.
Difficulty with speech patterns
Lying and stealing.

34
Q

Difficulty forming attachments

A

Effect of Institutionalisation.
May have difficulty forming future attachments.
Negative internal working model.
Unable to make relationships successful.

35
Q

Internal working model

A

A mental model of the world which enables individuals to predict and control their environment. For attachment, this relates to a person’s expectations about relationships.

36
Q

Role of internal working model

A

Quality of child’s first attachment is crucial.
Will powerfully affect nature of future attachments, if first attachment s loving and reliable, they will seek out functional relationships.
Bad first experience may struggle to form relationships or not behave appropriately within them.

37
Q

Internal Working Model - Key Study

A

Hazan and Shaver (1987):
Aim:
To test internal working model.
Procedure:
Analysed 620 replies to a ‘love quiz’ printed into a newspaper. The quiz assessed participants current attachment experiences and history, to identify childhood attachment type. Also assessed attitudes towards love, to assess internal working model.
Findings:
56% of respondents were identified as securely attached, 25% insecure-avoidant and 19% insecure-resistant.
Secure attachments more likely to have good and longer lasting romantic experiences.
Avoidant respondents revealed jealousy and fear of intimacy.
Suggests that internal working model does have later effects on relationships, particularly romantic.

38
Q

Early Attachment AO3

A

Theoretical problem with research relating to internal working model.
IWM are unconscious but tested thought self-report methods, not direct evidence as relies on people’s conscious understanding of those relationships. At best, indirect evidence.

Problem with retrospective nature of assessment, reducing validity. Replies on participants of self-report methods looking back on early relationships honestly and having a realistic view. Relies on accruate recollections.

39
Q

Early Attachment AO3

A

Theoretical problem with research relating to internal working model.
IWM are unconscious but tested thought self-report methods, not direct evidence as relies on people’s conscious understanding of those relationships. At best, indirect evidence.

Problem with retrospective nature of assessment, reducing validity. Replies on participants of self-report methods looking back on early relationships honestly and having a realistic view. Relies on accurate recollections.

Reductionist?