Attachment Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is attachment?

A

Emotional bond between two people in which each seeks closeness and feels more secure when in the presence of the attachment figure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define reciprocity.

A

Form of interaction between infant and caregiver involving mutual responsiveness, with both infant and mother responding to each other’s signals and each elicits a response from the other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Give an example of reciprocity.

A

Smiling - when a smile occurs in the infant it triggers a smile in the caregiver, and vice versa.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Harlow’s animal study.

Aim.

A

To study the mechanisms by which new born rhesus monkeys bond with their mothers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Harlow’s animal study.

Procedure

A

He used rhesus monkeys. Two wires monkeys with different heads one wire and the other wrapped in cloth were placed with eight infant monkeys. With four of the monkeys the milk was on the cloth covered wire monkey and the other four the milk was attached to the plain wire covered monkey.
Harlow during the time measurements found the amount of time the monkeys spent with each wire monkey.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Harlow’s animal study.

Findings

A

The monkeys spent the majority of their time with the cloth covered monkey which provided contact comfort.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Harlow’s animal study.

1 weakness

A

Unethical

Anxiety in female monkeys

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Harlow’s animal study.

1 strength

A

The research influenced the theoretical work of John Bowlby, the most important psychologist in attachment theory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q
Lorenz animal (imprinting) study.
Procedure
A

He divided a clutch of gosling eggs with one half once incubated seeing Lorenz as their first moving thing.

He later placed the marked ducklings together to show which had imprinted on the duckling’s mother and Lorenz and they quickly divided themselves up. The animals exposed to Lorenz during the critical period of imprinting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q
Lorenz animal (imprinting) study.
Findings
A

Geese follow the first moving object they see, during a 12-17 hour critical period after hatching. This process is known as imprinting, and suggests that attachment is innate and programmed genetically.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Evaluation of Lorenz imprinting theory.

Strength

A

Guiton (1966) using chicks showed yellow rubber gloves to feed them during the critical period and the chicks imprinted on the glove. Suggests that young animal imprint on any moving thing present during the critical period of development. The chicks were then later found trying to mate with the yellow rubber glove.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Evaluation of Lorenz imprinting theory.

Weakness

A

There are criticisms of imprinting as the concept of imprinting within Lorenz’s study suggests that within this context the object leads to an irreversible situation on the nervous system.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Evaluation of Lorenz imprinting theory.

Counterargument

A

Hoffman (1976) suggested that this is not an irreversible change which is then further supported by Guiton which suggested that after spending time with their own species they were able to engage in normal sexual behavior suggesting that imprinting is moderately reversible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explanations of attachment - Learning theory

Dollard & Miller (1950)

A

Attachment is a learned behavior that is acquired through both classical and operant conditioning. It is a nurture theory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What does the learning theory of attachment proposes?

A

That all behavior is learnt rather than an innate biological behavior as children are born blank slates.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the secondary drive hypothesis?

A

It explains how primary drives which are essential for survival, such as eating when hungry, become associated with secondary drives such as emotional closeness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Evaluation of the Learning theory.

2 limitations

A
  • The reliability is questioned as it is based on research with animals.
  • It suggests that food is the predominant factor in forming attachment. (Harlow and Schaeffer and Emerson)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Evaluation of the Learning theory.

Strength

A

It explains that infants learn through association and reinforcement.
Attention and responsiveness from a caregiver and sensitivity to the child’s needs allows an attachment to be formed. The sensitivity which the main caregiver provides is then mimicked by the infant teaching the child how to act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Explain Bowlby’s Monotropic Theory.

A

It suggests attachment is important for a child’s survival. Attachment behaviours in both babies and their caregivers have evolved through natural selection. This means infants are biologically programmed with innate behaviours that ensure that attachment occurs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Bowlby’s Monotropic Theory: what is the critical period?

A

(0 - 2.5 years)

If an attachment has not developed during this time period then then it may well not happen at all.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Bowlby’s Monotropic Theory: what is monotropy?

A

A child has an innate (i.e. inborn) need to attach to one main attachment figure. This suggests that there is one relationship which is more important than all the rest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is the internal working model?

A

A cognitive framework comprising mental representations for understanding the world, self and others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What are the 3 main features of the internal working model?

A
  1. A model of others as being trustworthy.
  2. A model of the self as valuable.
  3. A model of the self as effective when interacting with others
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Evaluation of Bowlby’s Monotropic Theory.

2 strengths

A
  • Evidence to support: Efe tribe of Congo.

- Evidence to support: Mary Ainsworth’s Strange Situation study.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Evaluation of Bowlby’s Monotropic Theory.

Limitation

A

The importance of monotropy is overemphasised – Thomas questions the benefits of monotropy and suggests having a network of attachments to support infants and their needs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Ainsworth’s Strange Situation.

Procedure

A

In the strange situation about 100 middle-class American infants and their mothers took part. The infant’s behavior was observed during a set of pre-determined activities.

The procedure involved the child experiencing eight ‘episodes’ of approximately 3 minutes each.

The child is observed playing for 20 minutes while caregivers and strangers enter and leave the room, recreating the flow of the familiar and unfamiliar presence in most children’s lives. Observers noted the child’s willingness to explore, separation anxiety, stranger anxiety and reunion behavior.

Ainsworth & Bell observed from the other side of a one-way mirror so that the children did not know that they were being observed.

27
Q

Ainsworth’s Strange Situation.

Findings

A

Secure attachment: 70%
Resistant attachment: 15%
Avoidant attachment: 15%

28
Q

Types of attachments.

What are some characteristics of secure resistant?

A

Infants are upset when left alone by the mother.

Infants avoid the stranger when alone, but friendly when the mother is present.

The infants uses the mother as a safe base to explore their environment.

29
Q

Types of attachments.

What are some characteristics of Insecure avoidant?

A

Infants are unconcerned by mother’s absence when she leaves the room.

Infants shows little interest when they are reunited with the mother.

Infants are strongly avoidant of mother and stranger, showing no motivation to interact with either adult.

30
Q

Types of attachments.

What are some characteristics of Insecure Resistant?

A

Infants are clingy to their mother in a new situation and are not willing to explore – suggesting that they do not have trust in her.

They are extremely distressed when left alone by their mother.

They cannot be comforted by a stranger and will not interact with them.

31
Q

Evaluation of Ainsworth’s Strange Situation.

2 limitations

A
  • Lacks of population validity. The original study used American infants, findings cannot be generalised.
  • Low ecological validity, and the results may not be applicable outside of the lab.
32
Q

Evaluation of Ainsworth’s Strange Situation.

Strength

A

It’s easy to replicate. This is because it follows a standardised procedure involving the 8 episodes of the mother and stranger entering the leaving the room.

33
Q

Van Ijzendoorn & Kroonenberg (1988) research on cultural variation in attachment. Aim

A

To investigate if attachment styles (secure and insecure avoidan and resistant) are universal.

34
Q

Van Ijzendoorn & Kroonenberg (1988) research on cultural variation in attachment.
Procedure

A

They didn’t collect the data for their study, instead they analysed data from other studies using a method called meta analysis. Data from 32 studies in 8 different countries was analyzed.

All the 32 studies used the strange situation procedure to study attachment. Using a meta analysis they calculated the average percentage for the different attachment styles in each country.

35
Q

Van Ijzendoorn & Kroonenberg (1988) research on cultural variation in attachment. Findings

A

Secure attachment was the majority of infants (70%). The lowest percentage of secure attachments was shown in China, and the highest in Great Britain.

Whereas Eastern countries that are more culturally close, such as Japan, had quite high levels of insecure resistant. (Germany has the highest)

36
Q

Evaluation of Van Ijzendoorn & Kroonenberg (1988) research on cultural variation in attachment. Limitation

A

The studies used in the meta analysis had biased samples which cannot claim to be representative of each culture.
For example, only 36 infants where used in the Chinese study which is a very small sample size for such a populated country.

37
Q

What does Bowlby’s Theory of Maternal Deprivation suggest?

A

Continual disruption of the attachment between infant and primary caregiver could result in long term cognitive, social, and emotional difficulties for that infant. Bowlby originally believed the effects to be permanent and irreversible.

38
Q

Evaluation of Bowlby’s Maternal Deprivation Theory.

2 strengths

A
  • Evidence to support: Harlow’s (1958) research with monkeys.
  • Real life application: i.e. orphanages.
39
Q

Evaluation of Bowlby’s Maternal Deprivation Theory.

1 limitation

A
  • Critics such as Rutter have also accused Bowlby of not distinguishing between deprivation and privation.
40
Q

Define Institutionalisation.

A

Behavior patterns of children who have been raised outside of the family home in an institution.

41
Q

Rutter’s Romanian orphan study.

Procedure

A

He studied Romanian orphans who had been placed in orphanages, aged 1-2 weeks old, with minimal adult contact.
This was a Longitudinal study and natural experiment, using a group of around 100 Romanian orphans and assessed at ages 4, 6 and 11, then re-assesed 21 years later.

58 babies were adopted before 6 months old and 59 between the ages of 6-24 months old. 48 babies were adopted late between 2-4 years old. These were the 3 conditions Rutter used in his study.

42
Q

Rutter’s Romanian orphan study.

Procedure

A

He studied Romanian orphans who had been placed in orphanages, aged 1-2 weeks old, with minimal adult contact.
This was a Longitudinal study and natural experiment, using a group of around 100 Romanian orphans and assessed at ages 4, 6 and 11, then re-assesed 21 years later.

These were the 3 conditions Rutter used in his study.

43
Q

What were the 3 conditions Rutter used in his study?

A

58 babies were adopted before 6 months old.
59 between the ages of 6-24 months old.
48 babies were adopted late between 2-4 years old.

44
Q

Rutter’s Romanian orphan study.

Findings

A

Those who were adopted by British families before 6 months old showed ‘normal’ emotional development compared with UK children adopted at the same age.

Many adopted after 6 months old showed disinhibited attachments and had problems with peers.

45
Q

Rutter’s Romanian orphan study.

Conclusion

A

This study suggests long-term consequences may be less severe than was once thought if children have the opportunity to form attachments.

46
Q

Evaluation of Rutter’s Romanian study.

2 limitations

A
  • We don’t know the extent of early privation experienced by these children.
  • Once the children were adopted they may not wish to take part in the study anymore so the results would not be representative.
47
Q

Evaluation of Rutter’s Romanian study.

Strength

A

Detailed measurements through the use of interviews and observations of the children’s behaviors.

48
Q

Internal Working Model.

Childhood Relationships

A

According to Bowlby’s theory when we form our primary attachment we also make a mental representation of what a relationship is (internal working model).

49
Q

Internal Working Model.

Childhood Friendships

A

According to attachment theory, the child who has a secure attachment style should be more confident in interactions with friends.

50
Q

Internal Working Model.

1 strength of childhood relationships.

A

Minnesota study (2005) followed participants from infancy to late adolescence and found continuity between early attachment and later emotional/social behaviour. Securely attached children were rated most highly for social competence.

51
Q

Internal Working Model.

Parenting style

A

Attachment type tends to be passed on through generations of a family.

52
Q

Internal Working Model - Parenting style

1 strength

A

Bailey (2007) found that the majority of women had the same attachment classification both to their babies and their own mothers.

53
Q

Internal Working Model.

Romantic relationships

A

The IWM influences a person’s expectation of later relationships thus affects his attitudes towards them.

54
Q

What is interactional synchrony?

A

Form of rhythmic interaction between infant and caregiver involving mutual focus, reciprocity and mirroring of emotion or behaviour.

55
Q

Explain Rudolph Schaffer and Peggy Emerson (1964) research on stages of attachment?

A

They studied 60 babies at monthly intervals for the first 18 months of life.
The children were all studied in their own home and a regular pattern was identified in the development of attachment. The babies were visited monthly for approximately one year, their interactions with their carers were observed, and carers were interviewed.
The following measures were recorded:
Stranger Anxiety
Separation Anxiety
Social Referencing

56
Q

Stages of attachment.

Asocial (0-6 weeks)

A

Very young infants are asocial in that many kinds of stimuli, both social and non-social, produce a favourable reaction, such as a smile.

57
Q
Stages of attachment. 
Indiscriminate Attachments (6 weeks to 7 months)
A

Infants indiscriminately enjoy human company and most babies respond equally to any caregiver. They get upset when an individual ceases to interact with them.

58
Q
Stages of attachment. 
Specific Attachment (7 - 9 months)
A

Special preference for a single attachment figure. The baby looks to particular people for security, comfort and protection. It shows fear of strangers (stranger fear) and unhappiness when separated from a special person (separation anxiety).

59
Q
Stages of attachment. 
Multiple Attachment (10 months and onwards)
A

The baby becomes increasingly independent and forms several attachments. By 18 months the majority of infants have form multiple attachments.

60
Q

Schaffer and Emerson study: multiple attachments.

A

Many of the babies had multiple attachments by 10 months old, including attachments to mothers, fathers, grandparents, siblings and neighbours.

By 18 months 31% had five or more attachments. The mother was the main attachment figure for about half of the children at 18 months old and the father for most of the others.

61
Q

Schaffer and Emerson study: multiple attachments.

A

Many of the babies had multiple attachments by 10 months old, including attachments to mothers, fathers, grandparents, siblings and neighbours.

By 18 months 31% had five or more attachments. The mother was the main attachment figure for about half of the children at 18 months old and the father for most of the others.

62
Q

Evaluation of the Schaffer and Emerson study.

2 weaknesses

A
  • Low population validity: The infants in the study all came from Glasgow and were mostly from working class families.
  • Small sample size: 60 families..
63
Q

The role of the father.

A

Most infants prefer contact with their father when in a positive emotional state and wanting to play. In contrast most infants prefer contact with their mother when they are distressed and need comforting.