Assessment Flashcards
DASS - anxiety cut off scores
Normal: 0-7
Mild: 8-9
Moderate: 10-14
Severe: 15-19
Extremely severe: 20+
8-10-15-20
DASS - depression cut off scores
Normal: 0-9
Mild: 10-13
Moderate: 14-20
Severe: 21-27
Extremely severe: 28+
10-14-21-28
DASS - stress cut off scores
Normal: 0-14
Mild: 15-18
Moderate: 19-25
Severe: 26-33
Extremely severe: 34+
15-19-26-34
K10 - cut off scores
10-19: likely to be well
20-24: likely to have MILD mental disorder
25-29: likely to have MODERATE mental disorder
30-50: likely to have SEVERE mental disorder
10-20-25-30
SDQ - Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
- Emotional symptoms
- Conduct problems
- Hyperactivity/ Inattention
- Peer relationships problems
- Prosocial behaviour
1+2+3+4 —> total difficulties
SDQ cut off score
Parents version:
- may be significant problems: 14-16
- substantial risk: 17-40
- emotional: 4 —— 5-10
- conduct: 3 —— 4-10
- hyperactivity: 6 ——7-10
- peer: 3 —— 4-10
- prosocial: 5 —— 0-4
Self completed
- 16-19 —— 20-40
- emotional: 6 —— 7-10
- conduct: 4 —— 5-10
- hyperactivity: 6 —— 7-10
- peer: 4-5 —— 6-10
- prosocial: 5 —— 0-4
WAIS WISC age
Wais - 16 to 90:11
Wisc - 6 to 16:11
Weschlers overview
Predictors of both academic and functioning in occupation
Best for making short term predictions
Assessing strengths and weaknesses
Mean score 100
Standard deviation 15
Bell curve
FSIQ and GAI
FSIQ: Less important when difference between index scores are 23 or higher
GAI:
- WAIS: verbal comprehension and perceptual reasoning
- WISC: verbal, visual and fluid reasoning
Eliminate working memory and processing speed as they are most sensitive
Calculating difference between FSIQ and GAI - determine brain, age, situation sensitive subtest could be lowering performance
Weschlers stages of analysis
Level 1: FSIQ, percentile rank, classification
Level 2: index scores, cluster groupings
Level 3: substest variability
Level 4: qualitative/ process analysis
Level 5: analyse intrasubtest variability
Weschlers level 2 interpetation
Indexes only be interpreted when there is less than 5 point subscale difference within the index.
If difference higher than this - DO NOT interpret, but investigate - look at other combinations of subtests
Strengths and weaknesses
Anything falling outside range - causing impairment
Significant difference between indexes
Weschlers clusters
Fluid reasoning: matrix reasoning + figure weights
Visual processing: blocks designs + visual puzzles
Verbal reasoning: similarities + comprehension
Lexical knowledge: vocab + similarities
General information: comprehension + information
Long term memory: vocabulary + information
Short term memory: letter number sequencing + digit span
Visual motor speed: block design, symbol search
Problem solving without visual motor speed: matrix reasoning, visual puzzle, picture completion, figure weights
Non verbal fluid reasoning: matrix reasoning, picture concepts
Quantitative reasoning: figure weights, arithmetic
General information: comprehension, information
Long term memory: information, vocab
Auditory working memory: digit span, number letter sequencing
Cognitive proficiency: digit span, picture span, symbol search, coding
Weschlers subtest variability
Clinical judgement guided by theory - specific for each case eg challenges with speed, motivation, short term memory?
Weschlers qualitative analysis
High/ low scores?
Unusual responses?
Weschlers intrasubtest variablity
Abnormal patterns
Eg person missed first item, pass other items - may suggest attentional deficit or memory loss related to retrieval difficulties
Crystallised vs fluid intelligence
Crystallised: acquired
Fluid: ability
Weschlers range
<70: extremely low
70-80: very low
80-90: low
90-110: average
110-120: high average
120-130: superior
130+: very superior
Verbal comprehension
WAIS: vocab, similarities, information
WISC: similarities, vocab
Low scores: difficulties with spoken language
Influenced by cultural factors
Professional occupation likely to have higher scores
Perceptual reasoning
WAIS: block design, matrix reasoning, visual puzzle
WISC (Visual spatial): block design, visual puzzles
Less affected by educational background
Low scores: challenges with following spatial directions, finding objects in house
Picture completion WAIS supplementary - identify missing part in the picture
Fluid reasoning
WISC only: Matrix reasoning, figure weight, picture concepts (supplemental), arithmetic (supplemental)
Less affected by cultural background
Working memory
WAIS: digit span, arithmetic
WISC: digit span, picture span
Low score: poor concentration, may also be difficulties w executive functioning
Not a diagnostic predictor for ADHD
Processing speed
WAIS: coding, symbol search
WISC: coding, symbol search
Planing and organising
Sensitive to dementia, traumatic brain injuries, adhd, learning disabilities
Those w high iq tend to have this as lowest, and verbal reasoning as highest
Cancellation- supplemental
FSIQ include
WAIS (10): Block Design, Similarities, Digit Span, Matrix Reasoning, Vocab, Arithmetic, Symbol Search, Visual Puzzle, Information, Coding
WISC (7): Block Design, Similarities, Digit Span, Matrix Reasoning, Vocab, Coding, Figure Weights
PAI general
Self report
344 items
How true a statement is - 4 point scale
18-89
PAI-A for adolescents 12-18
4 validity scales
11 clinical scales
5 treatment scales
2 interpersonal scales
Low reading level (grade 4)
Less than an hour
PAI interpretation steps
4
- profile distortion (test validity)
- determine appropriate reference comparision
- interpret individual scales
- interpret profile configurations
5
- Test validity
- Analysis if Critical Items - potential of crisis situation
- Full Scale - general population vs clinical sample - T > 2SD
- Subscale - more meaning eg ANX-T
- Configural - combining to make a meaningful clinical results (only experienced does this)
PAI Validity
INCONSISTENCY (ICN)
10 pairs of items with similar content
63 < T < 73: proceed with caution
T > 72: Invalid - STOP interpreting
INFREQUENCY (INF)
8 items (to be similarly rated)
59 < T < 76: interpretation w caution
T > 75: problematic, interpret with caution
NEGATIVE IMPRESSION (NIM)
83 < T < 92: negative distortion
T > 91: malingering (pretend), careless - clinical judgement whether to continue
— MAL index - 2-5 potential
> 4 strong likelihood of malingering
— RDF - similar to MAL, T > 59 purposeful malingering
POSITIVE IMPRESSIONS (PIM)
56 < T < 68: denying problems, defensive
T > 67: proceed with caution, under responding problems
— DEF 69 - purposefully defensive
— CDF 69 - reflect how they want to be portrayed rather than how they truly function
PAI clinical - SOMATIC COMPLAINTS SOM
Concern of physical health
- presence of real medical problems
- individual’s experience with their medical problems
T 69: poor health
T 86: preoccupied w health concerns
T 94: delusion
SOM-S: general complaints
SOM-C: headache, fatigue, gastro - T 69
SOM-H: health concerns - T 69 believe health concerns are complex and difficult to treat
PAI Clinical - Anxiety ANX
Worry, tension
Anxiety disorder, depression w anxiety
T 69: impact daily functioning
T 89: impairment
Cognitive anxiety ANX-C: T 69 overly concerns
Affective anxiety ANX-A: T 69 stress, worry, hard to calm down - most related to GAD
Physiological anxiety ANX-P: T 69 physical symptoms and somatic (SOM should be elevated w this)
PAI Clinical Anxiety related ARD
Examine 3 scales separately rather than together
OCD - ARD-O: T 65: impair functioning, T 74: disruptive behaviour
Phobias ARD-P: T 69: fear and avoidance
Traumatic stress ARD-T: T 64: trauma in the past - T 75: trauma is primary focus of concern
ARD commonly elevated along with DEP and BOR
Overall scale - motivation for treatment
The higher the more likely to refuse treatment
PAI Clinical Depression DEP
T 69: significant
T 79+: likelihood of MDD
Cognitive DEP-C: thinking of worthless, helpless T 69 unable to meet demands of life, self esteem, self efficacy
Affective DEP-A: T 69 distressed, gloomy, losing interest
Physiological DEP-P: appetite, sleep, motivation, energy level T 69
PAI Clinical Mania MAN
T 64: irritability, grandiosity, restless, acting rashly
T 74: likelihood of manic or hypomanic episode
Acitvity level MAN-A: increase speed T 64: disorganised, T 74: confusing others
Grandiosity MAN-G: T 70: grandiose, narcissistic
Irritability MAN-I: T 70: disagreement, non-cooperative
NOT often elevated with others
Can be elevated w BOR
Elevated - not hopeful for psych treatment
PAI Clinical - PAR paranoia
T 69: suspicious, hostility, monitoring threats around
T 83: paranoid delusions
Hypervigilance PAR-H: guardness T 70 preoccupied w potential threat - likelihood of paranoid personality
Persecution PAR-P: being treated unfairly T 69: believe others making efforts to get in the way
Resentment PAR-R: bitterness T 70 hold grudges, distribute personal failure on others
Exam DOM and AGG for how the person would respond, aggressive or passive aggressive
Elevated mean hard to form and maintain therapeutic alliance
PAI Clinical Schizophrenia SCZ
Subscale rather than overall
T 69: blizzard/ odd thinking, impair attention and concentration
Psychotic Experience SCZ-P: positive symptoms of scz, T 70: perception and beliefs that may be delusional - actively experiencing psychotic episode
Social Detachment SCZ-S: T 69 tend to isolate themselves, lack of interests in relationships
Thought disorder SCZ-T: T 69: confusion, loose association
SCZ elevated w Paranoid, BOR, Alcohol and Drug problems
PAI Clinical Borderline features BOR
T 69: rapid swings of mood, easily feel hurt or betrayed
T 90: likely to meet criteria for borderline personality disorder
Affective Instability BOR-A: T 69: sudden, uncomfortable shifts of emotions, rapid changes to anger or negative feelings
Identity Problems BOR-I: T 69: uncertain about who they are, rely on help for making decisions
Negative Relationships BOR-N: T 69: stormy relationships, problem attachment, disappointed due to high expectations
T 80: easily offended, extremely sensitive
Self harm BOR-S: NOT suicidal tendency - T 69: act impulsively - T 85: reckless and dangerous behaviours
PAI Clinical Antisocial features ANT
T 69: impulsive and dangerous to themselves and others
T 82: likely to meet criteria for antisocial personality disorder
ANT-A: personal traits, history behaviours - T 69: rules breaking behaviour in the past, difficulties w authorities
Egocentricity ANT-E: T 69: little regards for those around, exploit others, rarely feel remorseful
Stimulus seeking ANT-S: T 69: potential threat to themselves and others, craving, risky,
Most commonly elevated w alcohol and drug
Little motivation to change, hard for therapy
PAI Clinical ALCOHOL ACL
T 69: struggle w alcohol abuse , likely to have problems w personal relationships and health