Arson - Modules Flashcards
Arson section 267 (1)(a) CA 61
14 years
- Intentionally OR Recklessly
- Damages By Fire OR By Means Of Any Explosive
- Any Property
- If He Or She Knows Or Ought To Know That Danger To Life Is Likely To Ensue
Arson Section 267(1)(b) CA 61
14 Years
- Intentionally OR Recklessly
- Damages By Fire OR By Means Of Any Explosive
- Without Claim Of Right
- Any Immovable Property OR Any Vehicle OR Ship OR Aircraft
- Which That Person Has No Interest
Arson Section 267(1)(c) CA 61
14 Years
- Intentionally
- Damages By Fire OR By Means Of Any Explosive
- Any Immovable Property OR Any Vehicle OR Ship OR Aircraft
- With Intent To Obtain Any Benefit OR To Cause Loss To Any Other Person
Arson Section 267(2)(a) CA 61
7 Years
- Intentionally OR Recklessly
- Damages By Fire OR By Means Of Any Explosive
- Without Claim Of Right
- Any Property That Person Has No Interest (Other then referred to in subsection 1)
Arson Section 267(2)(b) CA 61
7 Years
- Intentionally OR Recklessly
- Damages By Fire OR By Means Of Any Explosive
- Any Property (Other than property referred in subsection 1)
- With Intent To Obtain Any Benefit OR With Intent To Cause Loss To Any Other Person
Arson 267(3) CA 61
5 Years
- Intentionally
- Damages By Fire OR By Means Of Any Explosive
- Any Property
- With Reckless disregard for the safety of any other property
Attempted arson section 268 CA 61
10 years
- attempts to commit arson
- in respect of any immovable property or any vehicle ship or aircraft
Intentional damage section 269(1) CA 61
10 Years
- intentionally or recklessly
- destroys or damages any property
- if he or she knows or ought to know that danger to life is likely to result
Intentional damage section 267(2)(a) CA 61
7 years
- intentionally or recklessly
- without claim of right
- destroys or damages any property
- in which that person has no interest
Intentional damage section 269(2)(b) CA 61
7 years
- intentionally or recklessly
- without claim of right
- destroys or damages any property
- with intent to obtain any benefit or with intent to cause loss to any other person
Intentional damage section 269(3) CA 61
7 years
- intentionally
- destroys or damages
- any property
- with reckless disregard for the safety of any other property
Two types of intent
- Intent to produce a specific result
2. Deliberate act (more than involuntary or accidental)
Who is responsible for proving intent
Onus is on the prosecution to prove an offenders intent beyond reasonable doubt
Three factors of circumstantial evidence
- Surrounding circumstance
- Offenders actions and words before during and after
- Nature of act itself
Case law for recklessness
R v harney
Recklessness means the conscious and deliberate taking of an unjustified risk together with an intention to continue the course of conduct regardless of risk
Subjective and objective test for proving recklessness
- Subjective test - defendant consciously and deliberately ran a risk
- That the risk was one that was unreasonable to take in the circumstances as they were known to the defendant
How is damage by fire or explosive proved
MSBCB
- melting
- significant smoke damage
- burning
- charing
- blistering of paint
Case law for damages by fire
R V Archer
Property may be damaged if it suffers permanent or temporary physical harm or permanent or temporary impairment of its use or value
Describe explosive
Any substance or mixture or combination of substances which in is natural state is capable either of decomposition at such rapid rate as to result in an explosion or of producing a pyrotechnic effect
Name six examples of explosives
DRDGFF
- dynamite
- Rockets
- Detonators
- Gunpowder
- Fuses
- Fog signals
Not including firearms or fireworks
What is property
Real and personal includes tangible such as physical items and intangible such as electricity
What is meant by knows or ought to know
Knowing means knowing or correctly believing. May believing something wrongly but cannot know something that is false
Simester and brookbanks
Subjective and objective test for knows or ought to know
- Subjective test - what was the defendant thinking at the time, know human life was likely to be endangered by actions
- Objective test - what would a reasonable person have thought in the same circumstances
What is claim of right
A belief at the time of the act in a propriety or possessory right in the property in relation which offence alleged to be committed
What is a vehicle
A contrivance equipped with wheels, tracks or revolving runners on which it moves or is moved
What is cause loss and case law
Involves financial detriment to the victim
R v Morley
Loss is assessed by the extent to which the complaints position prior to the offence has been diminished or impaired
How is someone guilty of attempts
- Intends to commit the offence
- Takes a real and substantial step towards achieving that aim
Must have progressed past the stage of preparation and commenced a process intended to lead to the commission of the full offence
What is the case law for proximate
R v Harpur
The court may have regard to the conduct viewed cumulatively up to the point when the conduct in question stopped the defendants conduct may be considered on its entirety considering how much remains to be done is always relevant though not determinative
Who is responsible for health and safety
All police employees
Power and duties while fire being fought
Section 28 fire service act 75
CARRE
- Close roads
- Anything else that is reasonably necessary for the protection of life and safety
- Remove vehicles impeding the fire service. (Break in)
- Remove people who are in danger or interfering with operations using reasonable force
- Enter private property when on fire or endangered or entry is essential to performing a necessary duty.
Police may exercise these powers if called upon to do so by the member of the fire service in charge of fire
No right because they are present
When will fire notify police
- Fire results in serious injury or death
2. Fire considered suspicious