areas Flashcards

1
Q

cognitive area assumptions?

A

behaviour is explained in terms of mental processes (memory, attention, perception, language, reasoning and thought)

mind is like computer, inputting, storing and retrieving information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

cognitive area methodology?

A

favours highly scientific procedures

cannot be studied directly, often relies on self report to see what Ps can or can’t do

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

cognitive area strengths?

A

highly scientific, allowing cause and effect to be determined

useful with everyday applications

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

cognitive area weaknesses?

A

computer analogy is reductionist, brain more complex

controlled experiments mean ecological validity and generalisability low

self report risks demand characteristics

quantitative data lacks deeper understanding of processes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

research to illustrate the cognitive area?

A

loftus & palmer: cognitive process of memory, false memories

grant et al: cognitive process of memory, context dependant memory

moray: cognitive process of attention, selective attention

simons & chabris: cognitive process of attention, inattentional blindness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

developmental area assumptions?

A

there are systematic changes in an individual’s behaviour from birth to death

behavioural development is the result of an interaction between nature and nurture (inheritance and experience)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

developmental area methodology?

A

uses a range of methods, from case studies to controlled lab experiments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

developmental area strengths?

A

useful applications

wide range of methods allow for understanding through qualitative and quantitative data

addresses nature/nurture debate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

developmental area weaknesses?

A

narrow focus, dominated by children

ethical concerns about studying children

practical issues surrounding using children, difficult subjects, adults interpreting children’s behaviour is problematic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

research to illustrate the developmental area?

A

bandura et al: external influences, transmission of aggression, influence of environment/role model on a child’s behaviour

chaney et al: external influences, funhaler, illustrating how children learn

kohlberg: moral development, stages of moral development, how children develop over time through stages of morality

lee et al: moral development, truth/lie-telling, changes in moral development in children depending on age and culture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

social area assumptions?

A

all behaviour occurs in a social context even when nobody else is present

society and other people are a huge influence on people’s behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

social area methodology?

A

dominated by field experiments

self report to measure attitudes towards social issues

lab experiments have problems with generalisability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

social area strengths?

A

relevant, allowing understanding of real life issues

useful, with practical applications

popularized psychology in the public eye

ecological validity due to field experiments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

social area weaknesses?

A

ethical issues in research and findings

field experiments lack control

ethnocentric and may not be generalisable

validity may not stand the test of time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

research to illustrate the social area?

A

milgram: authority, obedience, extent to which a social situation can affect someone’s behaviour

bocchiaro et al: authority, disobedience and whistleblowing, confirming that the influence of someone else will lead to more obedience than they’d predict

piliavin et al: in need, subway samaritan, impact of other people on helping behaviour

levine et al: in need, cross-cultural altruism, correlated variables were social and so was situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly