Approaches to Scale Construction Flashcards

1
Q

Reflective measure:

A

when the indicators of the construct are considered to be caused by the construct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Give an example of a reflective measure:

A

pretty much all psychological constructs – extraversion, organizational commitment, work-family conflict

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Formative measure:

A

when the measured variables are considered to be the cause of the construct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are [pretty much] all psychological measures considered?

A

reflective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Explain the deductive approach to scale construction:

A

this approach is all conceptual and does not involve data collection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the 3 steps to the deductive scale construction approach?

A

1) define the construct based on theory
- break it down into dimensions (components)
- also defining what it is NOT
2) write items for each dimension
3) have experts “ensure” items are related to the dimensions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the [two] advantages to using the deductive scale construction approach?

A

1) strong tie to theory
2) covers the full range of the construct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the [two] disadvantages to using the deductive scale construction approach?

A

1) the quality of your measure is based off the strength of the theory you used
2) the items you create may not relate to one another (empirically) in the way you expected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

(T/F) The deductive approach is commonly used in it’s purest form.

A

False

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain the inductive approach to scale construction:

A

This approach does not require theory, but instead uses a sample of people to describe the construct.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the 5 steps to the inductive scale construction approach?

A

1) define the construct space (generally, and not based on theory)
2) write a set of items that seem to fall within that space
3) administer the items to a lot of people
4) evaluate the results
- specifically, the quality of each specific item and uncover
the basic dimensions of the construct with a exploratory
factor analysis
5) interpret and name the dimensions of the construct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the [three] advantages to using the inductive scale construction approach?

A

1) you can develop an understanding of the construct as you go
2) we can refine the understanding of a construct
3) you can get rid of bad items (data analysis)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the [two] advantages to using the inductive scale construction approach?

A

1) subjective interpretation of the dimensions
2) understanding of the construct influenced by chance
- item correlations can change with as you test it on more samples

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

(T/F) The inductive approach is commonly used in it’s purest form.

A

False

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

When is it particularly helpful to use the inductive approach?

A

When developing new constructs or ideas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Explain the deductive-inductive approach to scale construction:

A

Using the advantages of both the inductive and deductive approaches.

17
Q

What are the 5 steps to the deductive-inductive scale construction approach?

A

1) Specify the construct we well as you can
2) Write items to represent the construct
3) Collect data
4) Evaluate the items with respect to data and theory
5) Repeat as necessary

18
Q

Further explain step 4 of the deductive-inductive scale construction approach [evaluate the items with respect to data and theory]:

A

Just because there is a data-based problem, doesn’t mean you should get rid of the item automatically. You should evaluate the data in light of your own theory. When an item is not functioning well, but you think the item really should work, let the theory win.

19
Q

Discriminant validity:

A

the extent to which a test is not related to another test that measures a different construct

20
Q

Convergent validity:

A

how closely a test is related with other tests that measure the same or similar constructs

21
Q

What are the three assumptions of the inductive and deductive approaches?

A

1) people interpret the items the same way
2) people are aware of, and can report their own behavior
3) people are willing to tell you about their behavior

22
Q

Explain the Empirical Keying approach to scale construction:

A

Approach scale construction with the theory that item responses alone are interesting behavior. Therefore, an item is of value if it reliably differentiates a criterion group from a comparison group. Based on responses, you can make a prediction about your group membership.

23
Q

What is the empirical approach based on?

A

that the assumptions of the inductive and deductive approaches are untenable (not able to be supported)

24
Q

What are the 4 steps to the empirical keying scale construction approach?

A

1) Generate items with response format of true/false
2) Have two different samples respond to the items
3) Compare each group’s responses to each item
4) Cross-validate

25
Q

What statistical procedure do you use to compare group responses with the empirical keying method?

A

A t-test or compare effect sizes.

26
Q

Do you have to explain why the groups are different with the empirical keying approach?

A

No, it doesn’t require any theory. You just have to show that the groups are different – this means you could have really weird items. For ex: depressed people typically report not liking the color green compared to those who are not clinically depressed.

27
Q

What is cross-validation?

A

A procedure used to assess the stability of a statistical model

28
Q

How is cross-validation done?

A

A data set is randomly divided into two subsets, the first is used to develop the model and the second is used to test it.

In regression analysis, for example, the first subset would be analyzed in order to develop a regression equation, which would then be applied to the remaining subset to see how well it predicts the scores that were actually observed.

29
Q

What is the most well-known empirically keyed test?

A

MMPI (Minnesota Multi-phasic Personality Inventory)

Psychometric test used to assess personality traits and psychopathology.

30
Q

What are the [two] advantages to the empirical keying approach?

A

1) no assumptions about capability to self-report behavior
2) researchers can assess poorly defined concepts (help identify groups)

31
Q

What are the [three] disadvantages to the empirical keying

A

1) test taker don’t like it
2) tends to be long
3) there is little influence of psychological theory (actually better today)