Approaches - The Behaviourist Approach Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Behaviourist

A

People who believe that human behaviour can be explained in terms of conditioning, without the need to consider thoughts or feelings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does the Behaviourist approach reject and what do they instead focus on?

A

The vagueness of introspection, focusing instead on observable events (i.e. stimuli and responses, and the conditions under which learning would be most likely to occur - so often called learning theory).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Classical Conditioning

A

When a neutral stimulus is consistently paired with an unconditioned stimulus so that it eventually takes on the properties of the stimulus and it able to produce a conditioned response.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who undertook research on classical conditioning?

A

Ivan Pavlov

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

UCS

A

Unconditioned stimulus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

UCR

A

Unconditioned response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

NS

A

Neutral stimulus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

CS

A

Conditioned Stimulus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

CR

A

Conditioned Response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Before Conditioning

A
Unconditioned Stimulus (e.g. food) = Unconditioned Response (e.g. salivation)
Neutral Stimulus (e.g. bell) = No response (e.g. no salivation)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

During conditioning

A

Unconditioned Stimulus (e.g. food) + Neutral Stimulus (e.g. bell) = Unconditioned Response (e.g. salivation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

After Conditioning

A
Neutral Stimulus has become Conditioned Stimulus.
Conditioned Stimulus (e.g. bell) = Conditioned Response (e.g. salivation)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Other important features to Classical Conditioning

A

Timing, extinction, spontaneous recovery and stimulus generalisation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Timing - classical conditioning

A

If the NS cannot be used to predict the UCS (e.g. if it occurs after the UCS or the time interval between the two is too great), then conditioning does not take place.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Extinction - classical conditioning

A

Pavlov discovered that, unlike the UCR, the CR does not become permanently established as a response. After a few presentations of the CS in the absence of the UCS, it loses its ability to produce the CR.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Spontaneous Recovery - classical conditioning

A

Following extinction, if the CS and UCS are then paired together again, the link between them is made much more quickly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Stimulus generalisation - classical conditioning

A

Pavlov discovered that one an animal has been conditioned, they will also respond to other stimuli that are similar to the CS.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Operant Conditioning

A

Learning through reinforcement or punishment. If a behaviour is followed by a desirable consequence then that behaviour is more likely to occur again i the future.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Who conducted research into Operant Conditioning?

A

Skinner

20
Q

What is basic theory behind Operant Conditioning?

A

Idea that organisms spontaneously produce different behaviours, and these behaviours produce consequences for that organism, some of which may be positive (i.e. desirable) and some negative (i.e. undesirable). Whether or not organism repeats a particular behaviour depends on the nature of these consequences (i.e. it is reinforced).

21
Q

What special cage did Skinner create and what is its purpose?

A

The Skinner Box. To investigate operant conditioning in rats.

22
Q

How does the Skinner box work?

A

The rat moves around the cage, and when it accidentally presses a lever, a food pellet (the reinforcer) falls into the cage. Soon hungry rat begins pressing lever to obtain food. If food pellets stop, rat presses lever a few more times and then abandons (extinction).

23
Q

Reinforcement Operant Conditioning Definition

A

A term in psychology to refer to anything that strengthens a response and increases the likelihood that it will occur again in the future.

24
Q

Types of reinforcement

A

Positive reinforcement and negative reinforcement.

25
Q

When does positive reinforcement occur and example?

A

When behaviour produces a consequence that is satisfying or pleasant for the organism. E.g. food to a hungry animal or praise given to a child after they do something particularly well.

26
Q

What do negative reinforcers do? And example.

A

They remove something aversive (unpleasant) and so restore the organism to its ‘pre-aversive’ state. E.g. the act of hitting the ‘off’ button on an alarm clock allows a person to escape from the unpleasant ringing and restores the restful pre-alarm state.

27
Q

What are other important features to operant conditioning?

A

Schedules do reinforcement and punishment.

28
Q

Schedules of reinforcement in operant conditions.

A

Although a continuous reinforcement schedule (e.g. reinforcing a rat every time it pushes a lever) is most effective in establishing a particular response, a partial reinforcement schedule (e.g. reinforcing every 3rd lever press or every ten minutes) is more effective in maintaining that response and avoiding extinction.

29
Q

Punishment in Operant Conditioning Definition

A

Involves the application of an unpleasant consequence following a behaviour, with the result that the behaviour is less likely to occur again in the future.

30
Q

Example of positive and negative punishment operant conditioning.

A

Positive - adding something unpleasant as a consequence, such as slapping a naughty child.
Negative - taking something pleasant away, such as grounding a naughty teenager.

31
Q

Classical Conditioning Strengths: treatments

A

Led to development of treatments for reduction of anxiety associated with various phobias. Systematic desensitisation is a therapy based on classical conditioning.

32
Q

Strength of Classical Conditioning: Systematic desensitisation and when is it effective?

A

Therapy works by eliminating learned anxious response (anxiety) and replaces it with another (relaxation) so that the person is no longer anxious in the presence of the feared object or when in the feared situation. Found to be effective for phobias such as the fear of spiders and fear of flying.

33
Q

Limitations of Classical Conditioning Explanations: different species face different challenges to survive, so have different capabilities to learn through the process of classical conditioning. As a result…

A

Relationships between CS and UCS tend to be more difficult to establish for some species than for others.

34
Q

Limitations of Classical Conditioning Explanations: Seligman (1970) concept of preparedness.

A

Animals are prepared to learn associations significant in terms of survival needs (e.g. dog quick;y learn to associate smell of meat with food), yet unprepared to learn associations that are not significant in this respect (e.g. dog will find it harder to associate sound of a bell with food).

35
Q

Skinner Box Positive Reinforcement

A

Hungry rat moved around and would accidentally hit lever which released pellet of food. After a few time the rat learnt to go straight to the lever.

36
Q

Skinner Box Negative Reinforcement

A

Rat in box would get electric current shot through it causing discomfort. As rat moved it would ht lever which turned of current. Soon rat learnt to go straight to lever to tun off current.

37
Q

Five different schedules of reinforcement

A

Continuous reinforcement, fixed ratio reinforcement, fixed interval reinforcement, variable ratio reinforcement and variable interval reinforcement.

38
Q

Continuous Reinforcement

A

Involves reinforcing a response every time it occurs.

39
Q

Fixed Ratio Reinforcement

A

Reinforcing a behaviour after a specific number of responses have occurred.

40
Q

Fixed interval reinforcement

A

Reinforcing a behaviour after a specific period of time has elapsed.

41
Q

Variable ratio reinforcement

A

Reinforcing the behaviour after an unpredictable number of responses.

42
Q

Variable interval reinforcement

A

Reinforcing the behaviour after an unpredictable period of time has elapsed.

43
Q

Strength of Operant Conditioning: Application

A

It is used to shape behaviours. Behaviour modification techniques based on reward are used widely in clinical and educational settings.

44
Q

Strength of Operant Conditioning and Classical Conditioning: Empirical Methods

A

Both rely on experimental methods. By using controlled conditions, Pavlov and Skinner were able to establish causal relationships by manipulation of the IV and careful measurement of the DV. Reliable.

45
Q

Weakness of CC and OC: use of animals in research

A

Means the process of CC might not have consistent application. Seligman concept of ‘preparedness’.
Generalising from animals to humans. Apart from little Albert CC and OP mainly used on non human animals. Reliance on dogs, rats and pigeons tells us little about human behaviour. Humans have consciousness and free will, an ability to resist conditioning and impose meaning on the status of reinforcement available. But Skinner says free will is just an illusion and behaviours we believe are chosen by free will are actually product of external influences.

46
Q

Limitations of behaviourist approach: a limited perspective on behaviour?

A

Accused of ignoring other levels of explanation such as those who emphasise importance of cognitive factors and emotional states. Treating humans as just product of conditioning ignores evidence for role of other factors shaping behaviour. Skinner rejects saying scientifically untestable states. Complex behaviours better understood by studying reinforcement history of individual.