Approaches Flashcards
(149 cards)
Wilhelm Wundt
- Known as the father of psychology
- Opened the first experimental psychological lab in Leipzig Germany
- Devised ‘Introspection’ as a way of studying internal mental events
Introspection
The first systematic and experimental attempt to study the mind/mental processes by breaking down conscious awareness into basic structures of reflections, thoughts, images and sensations.
What psychological processes did Wundt want to focus on?
Perception and structuralism
Structuralism
- Theory of consciousness
- Involves use of introspection, self-reports of sensations, views, feelings
Process of introspection
- Involved person saying everything that is going through their mind whilst they are doing an activity.
- Must keep talking even if their ideas are not clear
- Research was highly reliable and able to replicate
- He later recognised that mental processes were difficult to study using introspection and should instead by studied using alternative methods such as brain scanning.
How was the emergence of psychology as a science questioned?
- Behaviourist John Watson questioned value of introspection
- Argued that introspection produced subjective data
- Made it difficult to establish general principles
- Said scientific psychology should only study phenomena that can be observed and measured.
- Created the behaviourist approach
Timeline of psychology emerging as its own subject
17th century to 1950s
17th-19th Century- As a branch of experimental philosphy
1879- Wilheim Wundt opens first experimental lab in Germany
1900s- Sigmund Feud introduced the psychodynamic approach and psychoanalysis
1913- Watson writes psychology as the behaviourist views
1950s- Carl Rogers and Maslow develop Humanistic approach
Timeline of psychology emerging as its own subject
1960s- Eve of 21st century
1960s- Cognitive approach was introduced, Bandaranaike proposed the social learning theory
1980s- Biological approach became the dominant scientific perspective
21st century eve- cognitive neuroscience emerges
Strengths of introspection and the emergence of psychology as a science
- It has helped to develop other approaches in psychology (e.g. Behaviourism with Watson and cognitive with Beck)
- It has the advantage of being highly scientific. High control in lab setting.
- It is able to establish what causes behaviour. Helps predict future behaviour.
- It is still used today in areas of therapy that study emotional states.(e.g. cognitive therapy)
- Wundt supports and advocates the idea of reductionism. Believe that consciousness could be broken down to basic elements without sacrificing any of the properties of the whole. Study of mental processes deconstructed into measurable units such as perception, senses and experiences.
Weaknesses of introspection and the emergence of psychology as a science
- Watson criticised Wundt’s idea of introspection and whether psychology was an emerging science. It produces subjective data which varies from individuals and is not objective or reliable.
- Nit very scientific or accurate. Wilson claims that psychologists have little knowledge about some behaviour and attitudes that might exist outside of conscious awareness (racism). Introspection would not help uncover and understand these thought processes.
- It fails to explain HOW the mind works and the processes involved in thinking whilst doing an activity. Cannot see how thoughts are generated and introspection cannot be properly observed (not scientific).
The behaviourist approach assumptions
-Following Darwin behaviourists suggested that animal behaviour can be extrapolated to humans.
Two forms of learning: Classical conditioning and operant conditioning
Classical conditioning- Pavlov’s research
Before conditioning:
Food (UCS) produces the (UCR) dog salivating
bell (NS) is rung and the does not salivate (NCR)
During Conditioning:
Food (UCS) is paired with (NS) bell ringing to produce salivation (UCR).
After conditioning:
Bell (CS) will cause dog to salivate (CR)
Association has been established
Principles of classical conditioning in relation to Pavlov’s research
- Stimulus Generalisation
- Discrimination
- Extinction
- Timing
- Spontaneous recovery
Stimulus generalisation as a principle of classical conditioning
Stimuli similar to the original conditioner stimuli will cause the conditioned response.
E.g. a bell with a different pitch or sound will cause salivation
E.g. little Albert generalised white rat to fear other white objects
Discrimination as a principle of classical conditioning
Stimuli similar to the original conditioned stimuli will not produce the conditioned response. This can be done by withholding the unconditioned stimulus.
E.g. similar sounding bell is rung but food is not presented at the same time so salivation will not occur,
Extinction as a principle of classical conditioning
The conditioned response is not produced because of the bell being rung. This occurs when the conditioned stimulus is presented without the unconditioned stimulus of food.
Timing as a principle of classical conditioning
If the NS cannot be used to predict the UCS-
If NS is after UCS or the time interval between the two is too long, the conditioning does not take place.
Spontaneous recovery as a principle of classical conditioning
Following extinction, is the CS and UCS are paired together again, the link between them is made much more quickly,
-If dog forgets it can be taught again quickly
Strengths of classical conditioning
- Research evidence to support the idea of classical conditioning being able to explain the development of learning and phobias. Pavlov’s research on dogs and Watson with Little Albert, thus classical conditioning is successful in explaining how learning can occur in animals and young children.
- Helped apply classical conditioning to treatments of psychological disorders. Classical conditioning has helped form treatments like flooding and systematic desensitisation which are helpful in treating phobias.
Weaknesses of classical conditioning
- Research findings such as Little Albert and Pavlov’s study lack ecological validity due to being conducted in a lab setting.
- May not be strong in explaining how adults learn new behaviours. Limited to animals and young children.
- Menzies criticised behavioural model, found that only 2% of people who had hydrophobia had a negative experience with water. So they had not learnt their phobia. Others found that 50% of people who never had a bad experience with a dog were scared if dogs.
- Can be seen as deterministic and ignores free will. It anticipates that an individual will respond to a conditioned stimulus with no variation , which is not accurate . People are not passive states and do have control of their responses therefore explanations are incomplete and inconsistent.
Operant conditioning with Skinner
- Form of learning where behaviour is shaped by consequences
- Active process whereby humans and animals operate on their environment.
- Two types of consequences: reinforcement and punishment
Reinforcement in operant conditioning
A consequence that makes a behaviour more likely to happen
Positive and negative
Positive reinforcement
- Reward when a certain behaviour is performed
- primary reinforcement= meets natural needs such as food to take away hunger or water to take away thirst
- Secondary reinforcement= meeting all needs such as money or stickers
Negative reinforcement
Occurs when we avoid something unpleasant. Handing in essay to not get told off or rat pressing lever to avoid electric shock.