Approach(s) Flashcards
1
Q
Classical Conditioning (Pavlov) (P&F)
A
- Learning through Association
- Dogs were presents with unconditioned stimulus (food)
- Lead to unconditioned response (salivation)
- The bell was the neutral stimulus and was sounded before giving the dogs food.
- Bell became the conditioned stimulus triggering the conditioned response of salivation to the bell.
- The dogs associated the bell with food causing them to salivate.
2
Q
Classical Conditioning (Pavlov) Evaluation
A
- Real life application (school and therapy
- Objective scientific method
- Strongly deterministic (all behaviour learnt from environment)
- Reductionist (limits to stimulus response bond)
- Ethical issues (used to control humans)
- Animal studies can’t be applied to humans
- Nurture (learnt from enviroment)
- Nomothetic (laws of conditioning)
3
Q
Operant Conditioning (Skinner 1953) (P&F)
A
- Learning is an active process through experiencing environmental consequences
- Rats in the cage pressed a leaver to release food pellet (Positive reinforcement)
- Positive reinforcement increases likelihood to repeat the behaviour
- The rats experienced an electric shock that was stopped by pressing a lever (Negative reinforcement)
- Negative reinforcement increases likelihood to repeat the behaviour
4
Q
Operant Conditioning (Skinner 1953) Evaluation
A
- Real life application (school and therapy
- Objective scientific method
- Strongly deterministic (all behaviour learnt from environment)
- Reductionist (limits to stimulus response bond)
- Ethical issues (used to control humans)
- Animal studies can’t be applied to humans
- Nurture (learnt from enviroment)
- Nomothetic (laws of conditioning)
5
Q
SLT – Bobo Doll Experiment (Bandura 1961) (P&F)
A
- Laboratory experiment
- 36 boy and 36 girls ages 3-6
- Group 1: 12 boys and 12 girls observed aggressive model (with a hammer and shouting at doll)
- Group 2: 12 boys and 12 girls observed non-aggressive model
- Group 3: 12 boys and 12 girls (control group) not shown model
- The children were placed in a room with the bobo doll which contained both aggressive toys (pistol) and non-aggressive toys (farm animals)
- Children in Group 1 were more aggressive than children in the other group
- Boys were more physically aggressive than girls with no differences in verbal aggression
6
Q
SLT – Bobo Doll Experiment (Bandura 1961) Evaluation
A
- Low ecological validity
- Lack of population validity
- Young children lack moral values (older children might have not imitated model)
- Demand Characteristics caused by unfamiliar enviroment
- Standardised procedure
- Easy to replicate
- Other factors eg. Biological (testosterone)
- Media’s influence on violent behaviour
- Soft determinism (there is choice for imitating a behaviour)
- Nurture (behaviour learnt from role models)
- Nomethetic (laws of conditioning)