Approach(s) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Classical Conditioning (Pavlov) (P&F)

A
  • Learning through Association
  • Dogs were presents with unconditioned stimulus (food)
  • Lead to unconditioned response (salivation)
  • The bell was the neutral stimulus and was sounded before giving the dogs food.
  • Bell became the conditioned stimulus triggering the conditioned response of salivation to the bell.
  • The dogs associated the bell with food causing them to salivate.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Classical Conditioning (Pavlov) Evaluation

A
  • Real life application (school and therapy
  • Objective scientific method
  • Strongly deterministic (all behaviour learnt from environment)
  • Reductionist (limits to stimulus response bond)
  • Ethical issues (used to control humans)
  • Animal studies can’t be applied to humans
  • Nurture (learnt from enviroment)
  • Nomothetic (laws of conditioning)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Operant Conditioning (Skinner 1953) (P&F)

A
  • Learning is an active process through experiencing environmental consequences
  • Rats in the cage pressed a leaver to release food pellet (Positive reinforcement)
  • Positive reinforcement increases likelihood to repeat the behaviour
  • The rats experienced an electric shock that was stopped by pressing a lever (Negative reinforcement)
  • Negative reinforcement increases likelihood to repeat the behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Operant Conditioning (Skinner 1953) Evaluation

A
  • Real life application (school and therapy
  • Objective scientific method
  • Strongly deterministic (all behaviour learnt from environment)
  • Reductionist (limits to stimulus response bond)
  • Ethical issues (used to control humans)
  • Animal studies can’t be applied to humans
  • Nurture (learnt from enviroment)
  • Nomothetic (laws of conditioning)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

SLT – Bobo Doll Experiment (Bandura 1961) (P&F)

A
  • Laboratory experiment
  • 36 boy and 36 girls ages 3-6
  • Group 1: 12 boys and 12 girls observed aggressive model (with a hammer and shouting at doll)
  • Group 2: 12 boys and 12 girls observed non-aggressive model
  • Group 3: 12 boys and 12 girls (control group) not shown model
  • The children were placed in a room with the bobo doll which contained both aggressive toys (pistol) and non-aggressive toys (farm animals)
  • Children in Group 1 were more aggressive than children in the other group
  • Boys were more physically aggressive than girls with no differences in verbal aggression
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

SLT – Bobo Doll Experiment (Bandura 1961) Evaluation

A
  • Low ecological validity
  • Lack of population validity
  • Young children lack moral values (older children might have not imitated model)
  • Demand Characteristics caused by unfamiliar enviroment
  • Standardised procedure
  • Easy to replicate
  • Other factors eg. Biological (testosterone)
  • Media’s influence on violent behaviour
  • Soft determinism (there is choice for imitating a behaviour)
  • Nurture (behaviour learnt from role models)
  • Nomethetic (laws of conditioning)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly