APGOVCH9.Zariah White Flashcards
amicus curiae
“friend of the court”; amici may file briefs or even appear to argue their interests orally before the court.
the office of the solicitor general, on behalf of the u.s. government, appears as a party or as an amicus curiae, or friend of the court, in more than 50 percent of the cases heard by the court each term.
appellate court
court that generally reviews only findings of law made by lower courts.
in the middle are appellate courts; these courts generally review only findings of law made by trial courts.
appellate jurisdiction
the power vested in particular courts to review and/or revise the decision of a lower court.
the supreme court has appellate jurisdiction in all other cases.
brief
a document containing the legal written arguments in a case filled with a court by a party prior to a hearing or trial.
courts of appeals hear no new testimony; instead, lawyers submit written arguments in what is called a brief, and they then appear to present and argue the case orally to the three judge court.
constitutional (or Article III) courts
federal courts specifically created by the u.s. constitution or by congress pursuant to its authority in article III.
the federal district courts, courts of appeals, and the supreme court are called constitutional (or article III) courts because Article III of the constitution either established them or authorized congress to establish them.
dissenting opinions
a type of judicial opinion issued by a minority of judges on a court who disagree with the outcome of a case and wish to explain their legal reasoning.
justice who do not agree with the outcome of a case file dissenting opinions.
chisholm v. georgia
a supreme court case that allowed u.s. citizens to bring a lawsuit against states in which they did not reside.
chisholm v. georgia was overturned by the eleventh amendment in 1789.
concurring opinions
a type of judicial opinion issued by a minority of judges on a court who agree with the outcome of a case, but wishes to express different legal reasoning.
justices who agree with the outcome of the case, but not with the legal rationale for the decision, may file concurring opinions to express their differing approach.
elena kagan
an associate justice of the supreme court, appointed by the president barack obama in 2009 while she was serving as solicitor general in hi administration.
prior to justice antonin scalia’s death in mid-february 2016, all nine sitting supreme court justices but one-former u.s. solicitor general elena kagan-had prior judicial experience.
eleventh amendment
an amendment adopted in 1789 protecting states from being sued in federal court by a citizen of a different state or country.
the states’ reaction to this perceived attack on their authority led to passage and ratification in 1798 of the eleventh amendment to the constitution.
federalist no. 78
a federalist papers essay authored by alexander hamiton that covers the role of the federal judiciary, including the power of judicial review.
alexander hamilton argued in federalist no. 78 that the “independence of judges” was needed “to guard the constitution and the rights of individuals”.
john jay
a member of the founding generation who was the first chief justice of the united states.
john jay was a diplomat and a co-author of the federalist papers.
john marshall
the longest-serving supreme court chief justice, marshall served from 1801 to 1835, marshall’s decision in marbury v. madison (1803) established the principle of judicial review in the united states.
the actions of john marshall, who headed the court form 1801 to 1835, brought much needed respect and prestige to the court.
precedents
a prior judicial decision that serves as a rule for settling subsequent cases of a similar nature.
decisions of the u.s. supreme court, however, are binding throughout the nation and establish national precedents.
senatorial courtesy
a process by which presidents generally allow senators from the state in which a judicial vacancy occurs to block a nomination by simply registering their objection.
historically, presidents have screened their lower court nominees through a process known as senatorial courtesy.