Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Anki PLC Q's > Anki PLC Q's List 1 > Flashcards

Anki PLC Q's List 1 Flashcards

1
Q

Which term could be defined as a large social grouping in the same geographical territory and subject to the same polictical authority and cultural expectations?

A

society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Which type of personal authority could be defined as authority from knowledge?

A

epistemic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Which type of personal authority has the alternative label of charismatic authority?

A

natural

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Which type of personal authority could be defined as authority that exists as a matter of convention (rather than right)?

A

de facto

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Which type of personal authority could be defined as authority as a matter of legal right?

A

de jure (which means from right)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Which type of personal authority could be defined as authority that arises from a moral high ground?

A

moral

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Which type of personal authority is derived from personality and demeanour?

A

natural

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Which term could be defined as all the people living in a specific locality?

A

a community

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Which term describes locations where police officers are trained by placing them in situations involving members of the public and in public locations?

A

community learning sites

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Which term could be defined as the connectedness and solidarity among groups in society?

A

social cohesion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the three elements of the general rules for determining whether circumstances amount to ‘driving’?

A

control of steering, control of propulsion, actions within normal everyday meaning of driving

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Is there a requirement for an officer to be in uniform when exercising powers under s.59 of the Police Reform Act regarding vehicles?

A

yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Which two things must an arrested person be informed of, when practicable to do so, according to section 28 of PACE?

A

that they are under arrest (even if obvious)the grounds for the arrest (even if obvious)[PACE Codes of practice require the caution and necessit but this question is about s.28]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Under which circumstances would there be a defence to dangerous driving that was dangerous as a result of the driver becoming unconscious?

A

sudden unexpected illness or injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Apart from dwellings, which premises may a constable enter, for seizing a vehicle using s.59 Police Reform Act powers?

A

any that he has reasonable grounds to believe the vehicle is (including out-buildings attached to dwellings)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

May a civil court ever make an Anti-Social Behaviour order?

A

yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Under which circumstances would there be a defence to dangerous driving that was dangerous as a result of a fault with the vehicle?

A

sudden and unexpected mechanical defect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is the standard of proof required for a civil court to make an Anti-Social Behaviour Order?

A

Beyond reasonable doubt (the criminal standard)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

May a breach of an Anti-Social Behaviour Order be tried in a civil court?

A

No is a criminal offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Which term describes a way of looking at society that focuses on an unequal distribution of power or resources between social groups?

A

Conflict model or conflict theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Put these terms in order of size, from largest to smallest:CommunitySocial GroupSociety Society, Community, Social Group
Which term describes a way of looking at society that focuses on how strong the bonds are between different groups?”

A

Social Cohesion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Within a conflict model of society, which term could describe all of the following: Social class, Economic Class, and Race?

A

social divisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Which is the first level of the Allport Scale of Discrimination?

A

Anti-locution “speaking against”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Which level of the Allport Scale of Discrimination follows the anti-locution stage?

A

Avoidance (the second stage)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Which level of the Allport Scale of Discrimination follows the avoidance stage?

A

Direct discrimination (the third level)(This is a narrower definition than is currently in use for ‘discrimination’)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Which level of the Allport Scale of Discrimination follows the direct discrimination stage?

A

Physical Attack (the 4th stage)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What is the top level of the Allport Scale of Discrimination?

A

Extermination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What does the W.A.R. model seek to describe in relation to discrimination?

A

the types of responses to discrimination from a dominant group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

What do the intials stand for in the W.A.R. model of responses to dominance and discrimination?

A

Withdraw Acquiesce Resist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Can an unattended vehicle be searched by a police officer if she has grounds to suspect it contains a kitchen knife?

A

yes(a S.1 PACE search for a bladed article)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Can an officer stop and search someone using S.1 of PACE if the officer is in plain clothes?

A

yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Is there a legal requirement to record on a C12 the name of someone who has been asked to account for their actions?

A

no(this has been removed from the code A)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Is there a legal requirement to provide a written record of officer identity to someone who has been asked to explain why they are walking along the street they are now in?

A

no(this has been removed from the code A)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Is it ever lawful to exercise section 1 of PACE’s search powers in a home’s front garden?

A

yes So long as the person has no right to be there

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Is a police officer ever empowered to search the trouser pockets of a member of the opposite sex using S.1?

A

yes since this does not involve removing clothing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

May an officer require a suspect of the same sex to remove their baseball cap if in a public view during a search of that person?

A

no this is further than JOG removal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Is a female officer allowed to be present if a male is moved to be searched out of public view and required to remove his shoes, if the suspect does not request her presence?

A

no

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

May a male officer ask a female to remove her gloves during a section 1 PACE search, if in public view?

A

yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Does s.1 of PACE empower police to search someone for stolen goods if they are believed to have come by them innocently?

A

yes there is no requirement to suspect that the searched person has committed an offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Can a s.1 PACE search be conducted on the basis of no more than reasonable grounds to suspect possession of stolen or prohibited items?

A

yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

May someone be searched under s.1 of PACE on the basis of suspecting him of possessing items for doing criminal damage?

A

yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

May an officer of the same sex require a suspect to remove his T-shirt if moved to inside a police van and completely out of public view?

A

yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

May an officer in attendance a contact lens laboratory search an employee suspected of stealing from colleagues lockers, using section 1 of PACE?

A

no not a public place

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

Can a pupil on school premises be searched for a ‘adult’ fireworks using section 1 PACE powers?

A

no not a public place

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

Is a police officer empowered to detain someone under s.1 of PACE for the purposes of questioning them in order to establish whether there are sufficient grounds for a search?

A

no the power to detain comes from the grounds to search

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

Is a police officer empowered to detain for the purposes of a search, using s.1 of PACE having had reasonable grounds to do so, and then question them in order to establish whether a search is in fact unnecessary?

A

yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

Which Act of parliament provides the most frequently used police powers of entry?

A

Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

Which section of PACE sometimes empowers police officers to enter in order to arrest without a search warrant?

A

s.17

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

Does section 17 of PACE ever give a power to search for evidence?

A

no

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

Does section 17 of PACE ever give a power to enter a premises that a person does not normally occupy or control?

A

yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

Does section 17 of PACE always give a power to enter a premises where there are grounds to believe that a person inside is the subject of a local arrest warrant issued during criminal proceedings for a summary offence?

A

yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

Does section 17 of PACE give a power to enter a premises to arrest without warrant for an offence under section 5 of the Public Order Act?

A

no it is neither an indictable nor specified offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

Does section 17 of PACE ever give a power to enter a premises to arrest without warrant for an offence under section 4 of the Public Order Act?

A

yes it is a specified offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

Does section 17 of PACE ever give a power to enter a premises to arrest for an offence under section 4 of the Road Traffic Act (driving whilst unfit through drink or drugs)?

A

yes it is a specified offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
55
Q

Does section 17 of PACE give a power to enter a premises to arrest for an offence under section 3 of the Road Traffic Act (careless driving)?

A

no it is neither an indictable nor specified offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
56
Q

Does section 17 of PACE ever give a power to enter a premises to recapture someone who ran away after being arrested for an offence of driving with excess alcohol in their body (summary offence) a week ago?

A

no they may be unlawfully at large but this is not considered to be “whilst liable to be detained [in a prison or similar place]” nor is the officer in hot pursuit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
57
Q

Does section 17 of PACE ever give a power to enter a premises to recapture someone who ran away after being arrested for an offence of driving with excess alcohol in their body (summary offence) a minute ago?

A

yes They are unlawfully at large and the officer is in hot pursuit so it does not matter that the suspect is not liable to be detained in a prison or similar place. this is separate from Road Traffic Act powers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
58
Q

Does section 17 of PACE ever give a power to enter a premises in response to intelligence for the purpose of recapturing a person who escaped from prison a week ago?

A

yes unlawfully at large whilst liable to be detained

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
59
Q

Generally, what standard of grounds is required by an officer entering a premises under s.17 of PACE?

A

reasonable grounds to believe the person is on the premises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
60
Q

Does s.17 of PACE give a power of entry if there are only grounds to suspect it is necessary to prevent someone being seriously hurt?

A

yes this is an exception to the reasonable grounds to believe standard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
61
Q

Does s.17 of PACE give a power of entry if there are only grounds to suspect it is necessary to prevent serious damage?

A

yes this is an exception to the reasonable grounds to believe standard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
62
Q

Does PACE allow reasonable force to be used to force a s.17 entry?

A

yes s117 for all PACE powers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
63
Q

Possessing articles for committing criminal damage: Can this offence be committed by a person inside their own dwelling?

A

yes there is no restriction on where it may happen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
64
Q

Damage with intent to endanger life: Does the ownership of the property make any difference?

A

no not a point to prove

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
65
Q

What is arson?

A

criminal damage by fire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
66
Q

“Foreseeing a risk and taking the risk any way” – which legal term could this define?

A

recklessness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
67
Q

May an offence of threatening to commit damage ever be proved if the threat is not believed by anyone?

A

yes not a point to prove

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
68
Q

May the offence of threatening to commit damage ever be proved if there is no intent to act upon the threat by its maker?

A

yes not a point to prove

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
69
Q

May an offence of threatening to commit damage be proved if there is no intent to cause fear that the threat would be carried out?

A

no this is a point to prove

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
70
Q

Under which type of circumstances may the offence of simple criminal damage be proved against someone who owns that property?

A

joint ownership situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
71
Q

Under which circumstances can someone commit any Criminal Damage Act offence when they are the sole owner of the property?

A

circumstances that include an intent to endanger life or recklessness to endangering life by such damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
72
Q

May someone commit the offence of aggravated damage contrary to s.1(2) of the Criminal Damage Act where they are damaging property that they are the sole owner of?

A

yes aggravated refers to the endangerment of life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
73
Q

May the offence of aggravated damage be proven where the danger to life is as a result of the act of doing the damage rather than it being a result of the damage itself?

A

no this would be likely to be an ‘offence against the person’ such as assault

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
74
Q

Would the striking of an occupied but stationary car’s windscreen with a sledgehammer be likely to be aggravated criminal damage due to recklessness as to whether life was endangered?

A

no the sledgehammer rather than the broken windscreen is danger (so long as the car is not being driven)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
75
Q

Which section of PACE empowers police officers to enter in order to search a premises for evidence immediately after arrest but without the arrested person present?

A

s.32

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
76
Q

Which section part of PACE gives a power of entry without warrant that requires an Inspector’s authority?

A

S.18(1)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
77
Q

Which part of PACE gives a power of entry without warrant that requires that a suspect must be present?

A

s.18(5)(the presence of that person at the premises must be necessary for the effectiveness of the investigation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
78
Q

Does s.18 of PACE ever give a power to police to search a premises following an arrest for an offence that can only be tried summarily?

A

no

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
79
Q

Under what circumstances, if any, does Code B of PACE allow premises searches to take place in th early hours of the morning?

A

when searching at a ‘reasonable hour’ might frustrate the purpose of the search

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
80
Q

Does s.18 of PACE ever give a power to police to search a premises following an arrest for a less serious offence that can be tired either way at court?

A

yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
81
Q

Does s.32 of PACE ever give a power to police to search a premises following an arrest for an offence that can only be tried summarily?

A

no(unless you consider low level criminal damage for which the power does exist)

82
Q

Does s.32 of PACE ever give a power to police to search a premises following an arrest for a less serious kind of indictable offence?

A

yes

83
Q

Does s.32 of PACE ever give a power to police to search a premises following an arrest for a less serious offence that can be tired either way at court?

A

yes

84
Q

Does PACE allow reasonable force to be used in the use of s.18 premises search powers?

A

yes s117

85
Q

Do the s.18 PACE powers ever enable officers to search for evidence of indictable offences that are similar to the offence arrested for?

A

yes

86
Q

Do the s.18 PACE powers ever enable officers to search for evidence of summary only offences similar to an indictable offence arrested for?

A

no

87
Q

Do the s.32 PACE powers ever enable officers to search premises for evidence of similar indictable offences?

A

no only for the offence arrested for

88
Q

Do the s.32 PACE powers ever enable officers to search premises that a person was in immediately before being arrested, which that person normally occupies or controls?

A

yes

89
Q

Do the s.32 PACE powers ever enable officers to search premises that a person was in immediately before being arrested, which that person did not normally occupy or control?

A

yes

90
Q

Do the s.18 PACE powers ever enable officers to search premises that a person was in when being arrested, which they did not normally occupy or control?

A

no

91
Q

Do the s.18 PACE powers ever enable officers to search premises that a person was in immediately before being arrested, which they normally occupied or controlled?

A

yes for the latter reason

92
Q

Do the s.18 PACE powers ever enable officers to search premises normally occupied or controlled by an arrested person, if they were not arrested near the premises?

A

yes

93
Q

Which section of PACE is most commonly empowers officers to seize potential evidence found during a search?

A

19

94
Q

Is an officer permitted to seize property under s.19 of PACE when not lawfully on the premises?

A

no

95
Q

Is an officer permitted to seize property when lawfully on premises but without any power to search?

A

yes

96
Q

Does section 19 of PACE give a power to an officer to seize property when there are grounds only to suspect that it is evidence, whilst they believe it will be lost or destroyed?

A

no it must be believed to be evidence

97
Q

Do grounds for believing that an item of property would be sold to a known person provide sufficient necessity to empower an officer to seize an item of property using s.19 of PACE?

A

No although this could relate to another necessity in some circumstances

98
Q

Is belief that an item of potential evidence would be altered provide sufficient necessity to empower an officer to seize an item of property using s.19 of PACE?

A

yes

99
Q

Is belief that an item of potential evidence would be damaged provide sufficient necessity to empower an officer to seize an item of property using s.19 of PACE?

A

yes

100
Q

PCSO GREAVES is on patrol with Special Constable HOWELL when they locate a female described as having just committed a street robbery; she is trying to get away. May PCSO GREAVES arrest this female using a s.24A power?

A

no there is no power when a constable is in a position to make the arrest

101
Q

PC ROGERS is speaking to a male who was present at a pub during a fight between two females. PC ROGERS thinks this person is a witness to the incident but the male refuses to give his name, and it cannot be found by any other means. Does this enable PC ROGERS to now arrest this male?

A

No - no offence has been committed

102
Q

PCSO MALIQ sees a teenager walking out of an address at which a burglar alarm is sounding. This young person is not particularly co-operative when PCSO MALIQ speaks to him, and tries to leave. PCSO MALIQ arrests this person on suspicion of burglary, using the power under s.24A of PACE. In fact the teenager lives at the address and no burglary had taken place.Was this arrest lawful?

A

No - if no offence has been committed there is no s.24A power

103
Q

PC LENDON sees a teenager walking out of an address at which a burglar alarm is sounding. This young person is not particularly co-operative when PC LENDON speaks to him, and tries to leave. PC LENDON arrests this person on suspicion of burglary, using the power under s.24 of PACE. In fact the teenager lives at the address and no burglary had taken place.Was this arrest lawful?

A

yes there were reasonble grounds to suspect an offence and that the teenager had committed it

104
Q

PC CORBETT arrests a drunk male who initially struggles and actively resist arrest. In the process PC CORBETT does not caution the male due to this behaviour. The male calms down just as the van arrives and he is then transported to the police station and cautioned when he is booked in.Is this arrest in breach of relevant the Code of Practice on cautioning suspects?

A

yes He could have been cautioned before placing in the van when he calmed down

105
Q

Which requires stronger grounds, suspicion or belief?

A

belief

106
Q

Can a police officer’s grounds for arrest ever come from 3rd party information?

A

yes

107
Q

Which section of which Act of Parliament does a police officer’s power to arrest come from in most cases?

A

s.24 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act

108
Q

Which section of which Act of Parliament gives any person a power to arrest for many offences?

A

s.24A of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act

109
Q

If a police constable cautioned a suspect, questioned them for a few minutes and then arrested them, would the constable need to caution at the time of making this arrest?

A

no

110
Q

Arrest necessity: Must a police officer believe or only suspect that the arrest is necessary?

A

believe

111
Q

Grounds for suspecting an offence has taken place OR grounds for believing an offence has taken place: which is the standard required when police officers are arresting under s.24 of PACE?

A

Grounds for suspecting

112
Q

Does the power to arrest to prevent a breach of the peace come from PACE?

A

no

113
Q

Can a police officer justify an arrest on the sole basis that it is necessary to do so to prevent the offence of driving without insurance being committed?

A

No - preventing further offences is not one of the necessity criteria

114
Q

For which type of offences does s.24A of PACE never provide a power of arrest to non-police officers?

A

those that are not indictable offences

115
Q

Someone enters a house with permission and then is told to leave an hour later. At this point he refuses to leave until he has intentionally smashed a vase. Is this a burglary?

A

No he did not enter as a trespasser

116
Q

Someone enters a garage intending to steal and sell-on a motorbike thought to be inside - in fact the garage is completely empty. Is this a burglary, and attempted burglary or some other offence?

A

A burglary – complete on entering with the necessary intent s.9(1)a

117
Q

Someone enters a house with permission and then is told to leave an hour later. At this point he refuses to leave until he intentionally steals a wallet. Is this a burglary?

A

No - no entry as a trespasser

118
Q

Someone enters a house with permission to enter the lounge and hall only. She leaves the lounge and goes to a bedroom to steal a wallet. Is this a burglary or just a theft?

A

A burglary – they have entered part of a building as a trespasser

119
Q

Someone enters a house with permission to look anywhere for a water leak because they are pretending to be from the water board. In fact they intend to steal money. Is this a complete offence of burglary?

A

Yes – the permission has been gained by fraud so they entered as a trespasser with intent to steal

120
Q

Someone enters an office without permission intending to give an office worker a black eye. In fact the worker is not there. Is this a burglary?

A

No – no intent to do GBH – not serious enough – otherwise this would be a burglary

121
Q

A dishonest employee is allowed access to an office in which a small safe holds the business’ petty cash. She finds out the combination and steals cash from inside the safe. Is this theft or burglary?

A

Theft – there is no entering of any part of a building as a trespasser

122
Q

Can a typical garden shed be burgled?

A

Yes - its a building

123
Q

Can a tent be burgled?

A

No not a durable structure

124
Q

Can an inhabited caravan be burgled?

A

yes

125
Q

Can an uninhabited caravan be burgled?

A

no

126
Q

Can an uninhabited house be burgled?

A

Yes - but it would be considered a non-dwelling burglary

127
Q

Someone with no permission to enter an office building reaches inside an open window with their arm to steal a wallet. Is this a burglary?

A

Yes his arm has entered which is sufficient

128
Q

Someone with no permission to enter an office building reaches inside an open window to take a door entry pass which they plan to use to gain entry and find items to steal, before returning the pass to avoid this security weakness being identified. Are they committing a burglary when reaching in?

A

no they are not intending to steal during this particular entry

129
Q

Which term describes the kind of act that must be done to criminally attempt an offence?

A

more than merely preparatory

130
Q

Which category of offences cannot be criminally attempted?

A

those that can only be tired summarily

131
Q

Could an offence that would be impossible to complete in the factual circumstances be criminally attempted?

A

yes

132
Q

If someone without any authority to do so imports a new type of drug into the country whilst mistakenly believing the drug to be a controlled drug, could they be guilty of criminal attempt?

A

no

133
Q

If someone tries to sell chalk powder whilst believing it to be amphetamine, could they be guilty of a criminal attempt?

A

yes

134
Q

State the three offences that are the ulterior motives for the offence of ‘Going Equipped’ contrary to the Theft Act. Theft BurglaryTaking a conveyance without consent(Theft includes all robbery and some burglaries)
Could someone ever be guilty of going equipped if they have no intention of using the item themselves?”

A

yes in circumstances where they were knowingly carrying it for another person’s use

135
Q

Could someone commit the offence of ‘Going equipped’ with an item intended to assist in only the planning of a theft?

A

no

136
Q

Could someone be committing the offence of ‘going equipped’ by retaining an item that had only ever been intended for a burglary that has already taken place?

A

no

137
Q

In what locations does the legislation state that a person can commit the offence of ‘going equipped to steal’?

A

Anywhere that is not at ‘his place of abode’

138
Q

Would a garden shed typically be considered part of an abode in relation to the offence of going equipped to steal?

A

yes

139
Q

In relation to the offence of going equipped to steal, would a car typically be considered an abode if not parked on the grounds of a dwelling?

A

no

140
Q

Could someone be guilty of going equipped to steal if the article in question was a car?

A

yes

141
Q

Would an article adapted for use in theft mean that there was no need to prove any intent by the person possessing the article, for the offence of going equipped to steal?

A

No - although it would be evidence of their intent

142
Q

What legislation makes it an offence to possess an article for use in fraud?

A

(s.8 of) the Fraud Act 2006

143
Q

Where could the offence of possessing an article for use in Fraud be committed?

A

Anywhere

144
Q

Could someone be guilty of possessing an item for some else causing criminal damage with?

A

yes

145
Q

S.5 Public Order Act: Could this offence ever be committed by someone not intending to cause harassment, alarm, or distress?

A

yes when such an outcome was likely

146
Q

S.5 Public Order act: Ignoring the defence of ‘reasonable behaviour’, could there ever be a defence to using threatening words outdoors?

A

yes if there was no reason to believe anyone (who was likely to be harassed etc) would see or hear

147
Q

S.5 Public Order Act: Ignoring the defence of ‘reasonable behaviour’, could there ever be a defence to using threatening words inside a dwelling, if there was someone else likely to be harassed inside too?

A

yes the dwelling defence although if defendant knew of people outside the dwelling this defence might be unavailable

148
Q

S. 5 Public Order Act: Could this offence ever be proved if there is no evidence of anyone actually being caused harassment, alarm or distress?

A

yes so long as such an outcome was proved likely to have happened

149
Q

S.5 Public Order Act: Could this offence be committed by a person outdoors if the only person likely to be effected was inside a dwelling?

A

yes

150
Q

S. 5 Public Order Act: Could this offence be committed by a person inside a dwelling if the only person likely to be effected was inside a different dwelling?

A

no the dwelling defence is available if each party is inside a dwelling

151
Q

S.5 Public Order Act: Is the path to the front door of a house considered part of a dwelling?

A

no

152
Q

S.4A Public Order Act: Could this offence ever be committed by someone not intending to cause any person harassment, alarm or distress?

A

no

153
Q

S. 4A Public Order Act: Would the relevant conduct always have to be directed at someone in order to complete this offence?

A

no there is no mention of this in the legislation in contrast to s.4

154
Q

S.4A Public Order Act: Could someone ever commit this offence if nobody is actually caused harassment, alarm, or distress?

A

no

155
Q

s.4A Public Order Act: Would the person who was caused harassment, alarm or distress have to be one of the people to whom the relevant behaviour or words were directed, for this offence to be proved?

A

no an idea similar to ‘transferred malice’

156
Q

S.4 Public Order Act: May this offence be proven if the words said or behaviour used are never directed towards anyone?

A

no

157
Q

S.4A Public Order Act: May this offence ever be proven on the basis of disorderly conduct that is not threatening, abusive or insulting?

A

yes

158
Q

S.4 Public Order Act: Could someone commit this offence without intending either to cause fear or intending to provoke violence?

A

yes so long as one of those outcomes is at least likely

159
Q

S. 4 Public Order Act: Could someone commit this offence without it being likely either that fear would be caused or that violence would be provoked?

A

yes so long as one of these outcomes was intended

160
Q

s.4 Public Order Act: Could this offence ever be committed under circumstances where the person to whom the behaviour is directed is not the person who is actually provoked to violence?

A

yes

161
Q

S.4 Public Order Act: Could this offence ever be committed if the person to whom the behaviour is directed is the only person who can see or hear, and that person is not provoked and only fears for that violence will be used against someone else nearby?

A

no

162
Q

Affray: Could someone ever commit this offence without actually using unlawful violence?

A

yes by threatening it

163
Q

Affray: Could this offence ever be committed if nobody is threatened and the violent behaviour used is not directed at anyone in particular no
Affray: Could this offence ever be committed if the only two people involved were both inside a dwelling?”

A

yes although R (on the application of Carol Leeson) v DPP 2010 adjudicated that there must be at least some prospect of a bystander being or becoming present

164
Q

Affray: Could this offence ever be committed if there was no person of reasonable firmness present?

A

yes

165
Q

Breach of the peace: Is a police officer required to witness a breach of the peace before arresting someone to prevent a renewal of that breach?

A

no

166
Q

Breach of the peace: Could there ever be a power to arrest if no breach of the peace has been committed yet?

A

yes if it is reasonably anticipated one is about to happen

167
Q

Breach of the peace: Could a police officer ever legally justify a breach of the peace arrest on the sole basis that without such an arrest, abusive and insulting words will continue to be used?

A

no there is no threat of harm - and some link to harm is always necessary

168
Q

Breach of the peace: Could a breach of the peace ever be committed if nobody fears that any person will be harmed?

A

yes if a person fears that their property will be damaged in their presence

169
Q

Road Traffic Act: Does s.4 (driving whilst unfit through drink or drugs) apply to all motor vehicles?

A

yes

170
Q

Road Traffic Act: Does s.4 (driving whilst unfit through drink or drugs) apply to all mechanically propelled vehicles?

A

yes

171
Q

Road Traffic Act: Does s.4 (driving whilst unfit through drink or drugs) apply to public places as well as roads?

A

yes

172
Q

Road Traffic Act: Is there a power of entry to search for someone suspected of a s.4 (driving whilst unfit through drink or drugs) offence?

A

yes

173
Q

Road Traffic Act: What is the power of entry to search for someone suspected of a s.4 (driving whilst unfit through drink or drugs) offence?

A

s.17 of PACE

174
Q

Road Traffic Act: For the power of entry to search for someone suspected of a s.4 (driving whilst unfit through drink or drugs) offence, which standard is required: reasonable grounds to believe or reasonable grounds to suspect they are on those premises?

A

reasonable grounds to believe…

175
Q

Road Traffic Act: Is there a requirement to administer a preliminary test before arresting for a s.4 (driving whilst unfit through drink or drugs) offence?

A

no

176
Q

Road Traffic Act: Does s.5 (excess alcohol offences) apply to all motor vehicles?

A

yes

177
Q

Road Traffic Act: Does s.5 (excess alcohol offences) apply to all mechanically propelled vehicles?

A

no

178
Q

Road Traffic Act: Does s.5 (excess alcohol offences) apply to public places as well as roads?

A

yes

179
Q

Road Traffic Act: Must a person’s ability to drive have been actually impaired, to prove a s.5 (excess alcohol offences) offence?

A

no

180
Q

Road Traffic Act: May a police constable require a s.6 preliminary test if only suspecting drugs and not alcohol?

A

yes

181
Q

Road Traffic Act: Is there a power to require a s.6 preliminary test on the basis of suspicion of alcohol in the body, without grounds to suspect that the driver is actually over the limit?

A

yes

182
Q

Road Traffic Act: Is there a power to require a s.6 preliminary test on the basis of suspicion that alcohol had been in the driver’s body, without grounds to suspect that there is still alcohol in the body?

A

no

183
Q

Road Traffic Act: Is there a s.6 power to require a preliminary test on the basis of a suspicion of drugs in the body, if there is no reasonable suspicion of the driver being unfit to drive?

A

yes.6 (3)(a)

184
Q

Road Traffic Act: Is there a power to require a s.6 preliminary test on the basis of suspecting a moving traffic offence, when there is no suspicion of alcohol or drugs in the driver’s body?

A

yes

185
Q

Road Traffic Act: Is there a power to require a s.6 preliminary test on the sole basis of an accident occurring, if you suspect that an injury has occurred?

A

yes

186
Q

Road Traffic Act: Road Traffic Act: Is there a power to require a s.6 preliminary test on the basis of an accident occurring, if there is no suspicion of alcohol or drugs in the driver’s body?

A

yes

187
Q

Road Traffic Act: Is there a requirement for a police officer operating a screening test device to be in uniform, if prompted by suspicion of alcohol?

A

yes

188
Q

Road Traffic Act: Is there a requirement for a police officer making a requirement to co-operate with a preliminary test, because of a suspicion of alcohol in the body, to be in uniform at the time?

A

no

189
Q

Road Traffic Act: Is there a requirement for a police officer operating a screening test device because of an accident, to be in uniform at the time?

A

no

190
Q

Road Traffic Act: Is there a requirement for a police officer operating a screening test device under s.6 because of a moving traffic offence, to be in uniform at the time?

A

yes

191
Q

Road Traffic Act: Is there a power of entry under s.6 to arrest someone who has run off after refusing to co-operate with a breath test, when there are no grounds to suspect alcohol or drugs in that person’s body?

A

no

192
Q

Road Traffic Act: Is there a power of entry for the purpose of requiring a preliminary breath test from a driver who is solely suspected of having driven under the influence of excess alcohol?

A

no

193
Q

Road Traffic Act: Is there a power of entry to require a preliminary test from a driver who has left the scene, following an accident causing no injury?

A

no

194
Q

Road Traffic Act: Is there a power of entry to require a preliminary test from a driver who has left the scene, following an accident causing only this driver an injury?

A

yes.6E(1)a

195
Q

Road Traffic Act: May a doctor responsible for a hospital patient who is suspected of driving under the influence of alcohol refuse to allow blood, breath and urine testing of that patient?

A

yes

196
Q

Road Traffic Act: May a police officer detain a person after they’ve been charged, on the basis that they are still well over the prescribed limit, but when they have no access to a vehicle?

A

no

197
Q

Road Traffic Act: May a police officer detain a person after they’ve been charged, on the basis that they are still well over the prescribed limit and they have would otherwise have access to a vehicle that it is believed they might use?

A

yes

198
Q

Can the offence of common assault be proved if there was no physical contact?

A

yes

199
Q

Can the offence of battery be proved if there was no physical contact?

A

no

200
Q

Can the offence of common assault be proved if based on intent to cause fear, but the actions go unnoticed by potential victims?

A

no even if a police officer observes someone taking a swing at someone if the target didn’t see then there is no assault

Anki PLC Q's (4 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions