Anglo Saxon and Norman England II Flashcards
How did William establish control? (2)
- The march to London - William and his men marched to Dover where they fell with dysentery, and when recovered took him and his men on a brutal south east march destroying houses and farms. Towns and villages were intimidated and surrendered.
- Submission of earls - william seized the royal treasury so aethling had no rewards, william threatened to cut supplies with his march, englands best warriors died in the battle of hastings, william = gods will
What did William reward his followers and Anglo Saxons?
His followers - lavish gifts to the pope, a heavy geld tax to pay the mercenaries, granted land
Anglo Saxons - edwin and morcar keep their land but smaller, edwin promised williams daughter in marriage but doesnt happen, gospatric made earl but he had debt, everyone who fought against william loses land, but that land granted to his followers
What were the marcher earldoms, names, rights, and privileges?
Hereford, Shrewsbury and Chester to protect the Marches. Could make new towns for norman colonisation, did not have to pay tax on land to invest defence and could build castles
What were castles, why were they here and give 4 features.
Motte and bailey castles were unknown and had a huge military and psychological impact for normans, and four features include:
- Palisade (strong fence)
- Keep (strong wooden tower for lookout)
- Ditch (surrounded the bailey and motte, also protected palisade)
- Gatehouse (access into castle)
Why were castles important?
- Located in strategically important places to keep the population under surveillance
- Used as a base for attacks
- Normans wanted others to feel dominated
How were castles different from burhs?
- Burhs protected Anglo Saxons, these controlled Anglo Saxons
- Castles were meant to be small and private, burhs were large and protected communities
- Castles were part of the Norman domination, burhs took longer to construct, and were designed to defend inhabitants, not attack foreign invaders
Anglo Saxon resistance, 1068, and cause
- Edwin and Morcar fled William’s court to go against him
- Edwin resentment
- Bad government - Odo of Bayeux and William FitzOsbern lawless
- Morcar’s resentment
- Loss of land
- Castles
- Taxes
William’s response and outcome to 1068 AS (Anglo Saxon) resistance
- William took his forces and took control of the burhs of Warwick and Nottingham and built castles and went to Edwin and Morcar earldoms
- Edwin and Morcar went to Warwick and submitted to him
- They were pardoned, returned to being guests in his court until they escaped again in 1071
Consequences of AS resistance 1068
- Put Robin Cumin in charge of the North (as a Norman)
- Edgar Aethling resistance to Norman control at Malcom III court
- Castles were effective - submission
- Other revolts happening at the same time - Eadric the West against the Marcher earldoms
Hereward the Wake and the rebellion at Ely
- Hereward went to Ely in 1069 and started a rebellion after he lost land to a Norman
- Teamed with the Danes for a raid on Peterborough abbey
- Morcar and his men joined
- Morcar captured while Hereward escaped
Harrying of the North reasons
- Destroy spirit of rebellion in North
- To prevent viking using Yorkshire as base for attacks
- A warning to other areas of England
- Military response to guerrilla warfare which depended on rebel support
- Revenge for the death of Robert Cum
Features of Harrying of the North
- Livestock killed
- Homes destroyed
- Took place in the winter of 1069-1070
- Areas affected were the Humber River and the Tees river
- Seeds destroyed - no food
Immediate consequences of the Harrying of the North
- Deaths of thousands from starvation
- Flood of refugees
- Families selling themselves into slavery
- Cannibalism from desperate, starving people
Long term consequences of the Harrying of the North
- No further rebellion
- Danish invaders went to Ely, as there was no Yorkshire base
- Norman aristocracy rose
- Criticism of William’s brutality
Landownership changes by 1087
- Over half of the land owned by 109 tenants in chief
- 5% land held by AS
- King’s royal estate made up 20% - more power