Aneja et al (2018) - Early onset schizophrenia Flashcards

To investigate and develop an understanding of early-onset schizophrenia

1
Q

What is the AIM of Aneja et al (2018)?

A
  • To investigate and develop an understanding of early-onset schizophrenia.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the main context of this case study?

A
  • This case study is one of several case studies conducted by Aneja et al on individuals who’ve developed early on-set schizophrenia

3 case studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

When did Aneja et al conduct this case study?

A

2018

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What type of research method was used?

A
  • Logitudinal case study (10-12 y/o)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is early-onset?

A
  • When a disorder starts at a signficantly younger age than average.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

When do symptoms of schizophrenia usually emerge?

A
  • Early adulthood
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define persistent hallucinations

A
  • False sensory perceptions that are not actually present in reality.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe the sample of Aneja et al (2018) ?

A
  • Young boy
  • Developed early on-set schizophrenia
  • 10-12 y/o
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Summarise the history of the case study

A
  • AGE 10 (Decline + changes)
  • AGE 12 (auditory hallucionations)
  • Symptom progression
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Describe the history of the ppts:
1. AGE 10

A
  • The boy began to show a decline in his academic studies and general behaviour.
  • This behavioural change coincided with
    his parents divorce, moving in with his grandparents w/ his mother, changing schools
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What could have triggered the boys symptoms?

A

(Major life changes)
1. Parents divorce
2. Moving in with grandparents with his mother
3. Changing schools

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Describe the history of the ppt
2. AGE 12

A
  • From age 12 he began **hearing voices. **
  • He belived his mother and other ppl were communicating with him via the voices.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Describe the history of the ppts?
3. SYMPTOM PROGRESSION

A
  • His behavior became more erratic.
  • He would mutter to himself and shout at people who were not there.
  • His sleep was affected and his self-care, signficantly.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was the boy’s treatment?

A
  • During the following years
    1. Administered to the hospital several times
    2. Prescribed medication for his aggressive behaviours.
    3. Diagnosed with early-onset schizophrenia (and released from the hospital)

Administered, Prescribed, Diagnosed (APD)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Name 1 strength and 1 weakness of the study

A

Strength= RWA
Weakness= Limited generalisbiility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was the result of the treatment?

A
  • He still suffered from apathy, social withdrawal, and resistance to going school.
15
Q

Why is the study ideographic?

A
  • Focuses on the unique expeirnces, symptoms and treatment of a single ppts.
  • The aim is to understand the specific case in great detail rather than form general laws.
16
Q

Explain 1 strength of the study.

A
  • POINT: Provides comprehensive understanding of early-onset schizophrenia which allows other practitioners to better recognises these early symptoms and provide treatment accordingly.
  • Evidence: Recorded behavioral changes: Inc social withdrawal, inc agression and violemce
17
Q

Explain 1 weakness of the study?

A
  • Point= Limited generalisbility
  • Evidence: Focused on 1 ppts/ many expetional circumstances and EV: family’s history of DV, relationship with father.
  • Explanation: The results, conclusions many to be applicable to different child cases of schizophrenia