Ancient Greek Philosophy - Aristotle Flashcards

1
Q

what are the four causes

A

Material, efficient, formal and final

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the material cause?

A

the things out of which an object is created

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the efficient cause?

A

the agent that brings something into existence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the formal cause?

A

the characteristics of an object which allow it to be identified

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the final cause?

A

the aim for which an object is created

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What were Aristotle’s key observations?

A

• Nothing comes from nothing
• The world exists in a process of change
• change occurs in two ways

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is potentiality?

A

The possibility of something becoming something else

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is actuality?

A

The fulfilment of a possibility in its fullest sense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is ‘nothing comes from nothing’ in Latin?

A

Ex nihilo nihil fit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the word Aristotle used to mean cause?

A

Aition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is Aristotle’s cause for the universe?

A

The prime mover

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What cause is the prime mover?

A

final

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Aristotle’s view on infinity

A

He postulated the impossibility if infinity suggesting there is a final cause to all causes: the prime mover.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the prime mover?

A

A transcendent necessary being that is unmoved and has not been acted upon against any other agent. It is unaware of its existence and only contemplates itself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

An example of how things attract things without moving themselves

A

A moth to a flame
The flame doesn’t physically move the moth but it is attracted to the flame and moves itself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How does moth analogy relate to the prime mover?

A

The prime mover like the moth doesn’t move but us contingent beings gravitate to it and are caused to move by the prime mover without any personal involvement.

17
Q

Is the prime mover aware of the motion it causes

A

No

18
Q

The prime mover is pure ….

A

Actuality

19
Q

What is pure actuality?

A

It has no telos ability to become something else

20
Q

Strengths of the prime mover

A
  • Satisfactory explanation for evil – has no claims to be omnibenevolent so has no responsibility to stop it, it is unaware of evil.
  • Some evidence for necessary beings- energy
  • anscombe - magician quote
21
Q

Weaknesses of the prime mover

A
  • Illogical leap to assumes because we have a cause the universe has a cause – fallacy of composition - bertrand russel
  • No sufficient evidence - hume
  • Aristotle is suffering an existential crisis – trying to find meaning where there isn’t any
  • He dismisses the possibility for infinity – numbers, we have no reason to believe infinity does or doesn’t exist so shouldn’t base our theory on it
  • fallacy of affirming the concequent
22
Q

Flaws of the concept that everything has a cause

A

• Quantum physics and atomic decay suggests there are uncaused things
• Flaw within the formal causes – if a human is missing a leg (a predicate for humans) that doesn’t make them any less human

23
Q

Strengths of the concept that everything has a cause

A
  • He used inductive reasoning, we can observe things have causes
  • Anscombe quote
  • natural theologians use the idea that the world has a point of contact with God that means we can understand him - aritotole does soething similar
24
Q

Strengths on empiricism and essential ideas of theory

A

• Uses modern thinking as society becomes more secular observation-based knowledge is favoured especially in science
• We can observe material things having a cause – chair

25
Q

weaknesses on empiricism and essential ideas of theory

A

• Plato allegory of the cave
• Descartes – if we a put a stick in water it appears bent showing senses can’t be trusted
• Arrogant to assume humans have the intelligence to observe everything and understand it.

26
Q

what are the processes of change?

A

potentiality and actuality

27
Q

how did Aristotle define change?

A

potentiallity and actuality

28
Q

what is aristotles use of teleology?

A

telos = purpose

everything has a purpose in the world - this its it final cause
the prime mover is the telos of the world

29
Q

what is teleology?

A

the explanation of phenomena in terms of the purpose they serve

30
Q

how did motion lead to the prime mover?

A
  • aristotle had a geocentric world view
  • stars etc move around the earth
  • yet motion requires a cause and how do things continue to move because this motion slow down
  • there cannot be a regression otherwise motion wouldnt have began
  • so must be a prime mover
31
Q

why can prime mover not be matter

A

because matter changes and they are pure actuality

32
Q

what is the soul?

A

soul is the formal cause of the body

33
Q

for aristotle how do we go from cause to effect?

A

there are a process of 4 causes

effect / actuality only occures if these 4 conditions are met

for example, a seed only grows into its potential of a tree if it has water and sunlight etc

34
Q

criticism about purpose

A

francis bacon -> rejects telos regarding it a metaphysical issue, modern science can explain change without an apparent sense of purpore

dawkins - no evidence of telos

sartre - rejects telos, existence proceeds essence, fabricated notion of telos due to fear

35
Q

newton

A

Newton’s rejection of Aristotle’s basis for the prime mover
Newton proved that Aristotle was wrong to think that motion runs out. Actually, motion (kinetic energy) just transfers into another type of energy.
If you throw a ball in outer space it will just continue moving potentially forever.
So, the stars/planets don’t need some special explanation like a prime mover to explain why they continue to move.