Anatomy and physiology of clinical research Flashcards

1
Q

Objectives

A

Be familiar with the main components of clinical trials, including research questions, background significance, design, subjects, variables and statistical issues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Anatomy sequence of a clinical trial

A
Research question
Background significance
Design
Subjects
Variables
Statistical issues
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Design

A

clinical trials and clinical studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Subjects

A

selection criteria and sampling design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Variables

A

Predictor and outcome

Confounding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Statistical issues

A

Hypothesis
Sample size
Analytical approach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Learning objectives of lesson 1

A

Know how a research question is approached.

Know some characteristics of a good research question.

Know the codes of medical ethics.

Appreciate and understand the applications of the abovementioned points to real-world scenarios.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Research definition

A

Research is a systematic investigation designed to discover or contribute to a body of generalizable knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How is a project of study considered research?

2 reasons

A
  • is conducted with the purpose of making conclusions with general applications
  • uses a widely-accepted scientific method.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The scientific method defintion

A

Research uses a process called the scientific method to solve problems or to resolve previously unanswered questions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the 6 fundamental components of a scientific method

A
Research purpose
hypothesis
experimental
interpretation
conclusion
theory formulation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Clinical trials

A

Clinical trials fall under clinical research,
Clinical trials is a primary method used by clinical researchers to find if a new treatment is safe and effective to people.
Clinical trials are research studies performed in people that are aimed at evaluating a medical, surgical, or behavioral intervention
Often a clinical trial is used to learn if a new treatment is more effective and/or has less harmful side effects than the standard treatment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

4 phases in clinical trials

Must all clinical trials be competent with Good Clinical Practices

A

There are FOUR (4) phases in a clinical trial.
Based on Food, Drug & Administration (FDA) requirements, only the first three (3) phases are required to determine if the treatment (or drug) is safe for use.

All clinical trials must be compliant with Good Clinical Practices.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

GCP good clinical practices

A

Good Clinical Practices are ethical and scientific quality standard for the design, conduct, performance, monitoring, auditing, recording, analyses & reporting of clinical trials.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Phase 1 clinical trial

A

Involves normal, healthy people
Small group size (~20 – 80)
Evaluate drug safety and safe dose range.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Phase 2 clinical trial

A
  • Involves a small scale of patients
  • Larger group size than Phase 1 (~100 – 300)
  • Evaluate drug effectiveness on patients with existing conditions.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Phase 3 clinical trial

A
  • Involves a larger scale of patients.
  • Larger group size than Phase 2 (~300 – 1000)
  • Confirm drug’s safety and effectiveness.
  • If results from Phase 3 are positive, FDA will approve the treatment.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Phase 4 clinical trial

A
  • Usually takes place after FDA approval
  • Monitoring the drug’s effectiveness and safety over a large and diverse population (used to uncover findings not addressed in Phase 3.)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Research question

What question will the research study address?

A

This contains the objective of the study, the uncertainty that the researcher wants to resolve.

The research question often begins with a general concern that must be narrowed down to concrete, researchable issue e.g.

20
Q

5 important qualities of a good research question

A

Feasibility, interesting, novel, ethical and relevant

21
Q

Find the
- general concern,
- narrow and focus
(the concrete researchable issue?)

A

If you’re allergic to dairy, lactose intolerant or you just aren’t crazy about the taste of dairy milk, reach for soy milk as a comparable alternative. Soy milk has become increasingly popular as a beverage and also has a number of nutritional advantages.

general concern - reach for soy milk as a comparable alternative

narrow and focus (the concrete researchable issue) - increasingly popular as a beverage and also has a number of nutritional advantages

22
Q

Difference between general concern and narrow and focus

A

Narrow & focus addresses more in-depth and specific issues in the research question (e.g. working population with diabetes, link between exercise and blood sugar levels).

23
Q

Feasibility

A

What are the practical limits and problems studying such a question? Can we actually carry this out?

It is important to know the practical limits and problems of studying a question early on, before wasting much time and effort along unworkable lines

24
Q

Number of subjects, part of feasibility

A

Many studies do not achieve their intended purpose because they cannot enrol sufficient subjects.

A preliminary calculation of the sample size requirements of the study early on can be very useful

An estimate of the number of subjects likely to be available for the study should be made by excluding those participants who refuse to participate and the number that would be lost to follow up. Even with such an estimate, sometimes the numbers may still be overly optimistic

25
Q

Technical expertise, part of feasibility

A

The investigator must have the skills, equipment and experience needed for designing the study, recruiting the subjects, measuring the variables and managing and analysing the data

Help can be acquired from consultants outside of the research team for procedures which are unfamiliar to the researcher, but for major areas of the study, it is better to have an experienced colleague who can be steadily involved as a co-investigator.

Members with different expertise are often required e.g. it will be wise to include a statistician as a member of the team from the beginning of the planning process.

The use of familiar and established approaches should be considered over developing new methods and skills as these are time consuming and uncertainties are plenty.

26
Q

Cost in time and money, part of feasibility

A

It will be important to estimate the costs of each component of the project, bearing in mind that the time and money needed, will generally exceed the amounts projected at the onset

If the projected costs exceed the available funds, the options are to consider

A less expensive design

Develop additional sources of funding.

Early recognition of a study that is too expensive or time consuming can lead to modifications or abandonment of the plan before expending a great deal of effort

27
Q

Scope, part of flexibility

Consider a less expensive design.

Develop additional sources of funding.

Early recognition of the heavy costs and time involved the study, which can lead to modifications or abandonment of the plan before implementation.

A

Problems often arise when an investigator attempts to accomplish too much, making many measurements at repeated contacts with a large group of subjects in an effort to answer too many research questions.
The solution is to narrow the scope of the study and focus only on the most important goals

28
Q

Interesting, aside from feasibility

Getting to the truth of the matter, which appears to be interesting and of primary concern to the investigator, provides a source of motivation for conducting research.
This will provide the intensity of effort needed for overcoming the many hurdles and frustration of the research process.

A

One of the motivations for conducting a research include getting to the truth of the matter appears to be interesting and of primary concern to the investigator

This will provide the intensity of effort needed for overcoming the many hurdles and frustration of the research process.

It would be wise to speak to mentors and outside expertise before devoting substantial energy to develop a research plan or grant proposal as you might find the question interesting, but to peers and funding agencies, the question at hand, is dull and of little interest

29
Q

Novel, aside from feasibility

Good clinical research contributes new information and a study that merely reiterates what is already established is not worth the effort or cost.
In other words, good clinical research uncovers new findings that are not repeated from previous studies !!!

A

Good clinical research contributes new information and a study that merely reiterates what is already established is not worth the effort or cost.
Although novelty is an important criterion, a research question need not be totally original. For example,
It might be worthwhile to ask whether a previous observation can be replicated

If the findings in one population can also apply to other populations

Whether improved measurement techniques can clarify the relationship between known risk factors and diseases.

A confirmatory study is particularly useful if it avoids the weakness of previous studies

30
Q

Ethical

A

If the study poses unacceptable physical risk or invasion of privacy, the investigator must seek other ways to answer the question.

31
Q

Relevance

How will the outcome of this research be and how will it impact scientific knowledge, influence practice guidelines, health policies or guide further research

A

This is one of the most important criteria in a good research question.

How will the outcome of this research be and how will it impact scientific knowledge, influence practice guidelines, health policies or guide further research

32
Q

How recruitment process works

A

Unfortunately, falling short in the rate of recruitment is one of the most common problems in clinical trials.
Recruiting enough subjects is critical in obtaining valid data in clinical research.

Recruitment of subjects involve contacting populations not well known by the research team (to minimise reporting bias)

An experienced member of the research team to contact the prospective subjects will be helpful.

33
Q

the work of john franklin enders

A

Develop the vaccines for poliomyelitis in 1952
Highly infectious viral disease which mainly affects young children
His work earned him the title of father of modern medicines

34
Q

Poliomyelitis (polio)

A

Polio is caused by the poliovirus, which spreads mainly through the faecal-oral route and multiplies in the intestine, from where it can invade the nervous system and can cause paralysis.

Contracted predominantly by children, can lead to permanent paralysis of various body parts and can ultimately cause death by immobilizing the patient breathing muscles

35
Q

The work of john franklin enders continued

A

The Polio Vaccine was introduced in 1955.
There were 13,850 cases of paralytic polio that year

The number of polio cases today have dropped by > 99% since 1988, where 350,000 cases were reported back then as compared to 22 cases today.

However, despite the progress, there is currently NO CURE for polio, but only PREVENTED by vaccines which can protect the child from contracting polio.

36
Q

Ethics

A

There are a number of codes of medical ethics which emphasize the personal responsibility of physician/investigator to provide subjects with adequate and appropriate information.

These impart principles of ethical conduct for experiments in humans.

These ethical issues revolve around the safety of the participating individual.

37
Q

Numbering code (ethical)

A

The voluntary consent of the human participant is absolutely essential.

38
Q

Belmont report (ethical)

A

Respect for Persons
Beneficence
Justice

39
Q

Declaration of helsinki

A

The health of my patient will be my first consideration.

40
Q

Nuremberg code history

A

The Nuremberg Code was created based on the verdict traced back in August 1947 (almost two years after World War II ended).

The trial was known as “The Doctors’ Trial” that occurred in the Nuremberg Military Tribunals in Nuremberg, Bavaria, Germany.

23 physicians from the German Nazi Party carried out atrocious medical experiments against the will of the prisoners-of-war (POW) “subjects” in concentration camps.

The cruel and inhumane practices experienced by the prisoners at the concentration camps led to the development of the Nuremberg code in the same year.

41
Q

What is nuremberg code history

A

Nuremberg code is a set of TEN (10) ethical principles to follow when conducing any experiments on humans, to protect human subjects from the torture the prisoners experience.

42
Q

Significance of Nuremberg Code

A

It laid the foundation for 2 things

GCP - the ethical principles of the Nuremberg Code influenced the principles of GCP

Belmont report and declaration of Helsinki - the ethical principles of the Nuremberg Code were expanded to form the Belmont report and declaration of Helsinki

43
Q

Tuskeegee alabama case study: Syphilis

A

Syphilis is a sexually-transmitted disease (STD) caused by the bacteriumTreponema pallidum.

In 2016, there were 88,042 new cases reported.
Benzathine penicillin is the recommended treatment for patients infected with Syphilis

Benzathine penicillin is the recommended treatment for patients infected with Syphilis

Beta-lactam ring in penicillin inhibit the peptidoglycan synthesis in bacteria (important in prokaryotic cell wall)

44
Q

Case Study:Syphilis Study (1932 – 1972)

A

Research project conducted by the U.S, where free medical examinations were given to 600 low-income participants (all of them are African-American Males).
The medical examination was conducted WITHOUT the consent of the patients.

Participants were neither told that the medical examinations were meant for a study, nor informed about their disease.

Out of 600 participants, 400 of them were infected with syphilis.

Participants were denied treatment, despite that a proven cure (penicillin) can be used to cure syphilis.
The study, initially projected at 8 months, continued for 40 years.

Throughout its study, MANY participants have died from the disease.

45
Q

More details on Case Study:Syphilis Study (1932 – 1972)

A

Free medical examinations were given; however, participants were not told about their disease.

Even though a proven cure (penicillin) became available in the 1950s, the study continued until 1972 with participants being denied treatment.

In some cases, when participants were diagnosed as having syphilis by other physicians, researchers intervened to prevent treatment.

Many participants died of syphilis during the study.
The study was stopped in 1973 by the U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare only after its existence was publicized and it became a political embarrassment. In 1997, under mounting pressure, President Clinton apologized to the study participants and their families

46
Q

According to the Nuremberg code, which of the 10 principles were not fulfilled?

A

The panel found that the men had agreed freely to be examined and treated. However, there was no evidence that researchers had informed them of the study or its real purpose. In fact, the men had been misled and had not been given all the facts required to provide informed consent.

The men were never given adequate treatment for their disease. Even when penicillin became the drug of choice for syphilis in 1947, researchers did not offer it to the subjects. The advisory panel found nothing to show that subjects were ever given the choice of quitting the study, even when this new, highly effective treatment became widely used.

47
Q

Nuremberg code vs Belmont report vs The Declaration of Helsinki

A

While the Nuremberg Code lays the foundation for all the other ethic codes, it mentions that voluntary consent of the human participant is essential but may not be considered first.

The Belmont Report mainly involves the three principles: Respect for Persons, Beneficence and Justice.

The Declaration of Helsinki is the code of medical ethics that emphasizes the health of the patient to be their first consideration when recruiting patients for a clinical study