Analysing Conversation 1 Flashcards
Definition of Conversation NOFSINGER
“everyday talk” in which there are at least two people
“locally managed” -> those having the conversation decide at the time who gets to talk/for how long, in what order
“fully interactive” participants take turns and make substantive contributions
“eligible to take turns”
- a conversation is not strategically planned, it flows naturally
Register
MODE
TENOR
DOMAIN
MODE (register)
Mode of communication ie. speaking/writing (conversations are spoken but can be transcribed/represented in writing)
TENOR (register)
Relationship between participants ie. formal/informal (how well they know each other)
DOMAIN (register)
Area of Activity ie. what is the conversation about -> this topic will have specific vocab eg. gardening, cooking, films etc
Pragmatics Definition
the study of language in USE beyond word meanings, considers whole utterances in context and its implications
Speaker Hearer meanings explanation
the utterance may have similar or different meanings for speaker vs hearer
Implicature and Inference
Implicature = additional meaning intended by the speaker over + above what is overtly said
Inference = additional meaning deduced by the listener over + above what is explicitly said
Grice’s Co-operative principle (4)
- Maxim of quality
- Maxim of Quantity
- Maxim of Relation
- Maxim of Manner
Definition of Grice’s Co-operative principle
= the fundamental principles of communication
co-operative = speaker + hearer co-operate together to ensure what they say can be understood by the other person
co-operation = following basic rules of communication ->(the speaker-hearer contract)
NB an utterance may follow all the maxims and still be unhelpful or unpleasant -> this is why Maxims not enough to describe all conversation
Applicability of Grice’s Maxim’s
All forms of communication can be said to be either following or flouting G’s Ms
Infringing the maxims
People may be said to infringe the maxims if they cannot help their behaviour
eg. extreme cases of schizophrenia/drunkness
young children, speakers not fluent/familiar with the language
the speaker unintentionally fails to observe a maxim
Adjacency Pairs (Schegloff and Sacks)
= pairs of utterances in which the first part predicts the second part (Schegloff and Sacks)
Adjacency pair examples
greeting->greeting
question_> answer
summons->acknowledgement
blame->denial/admission
Learning to use adjacency pairs / humour
children have to learn these
unexpected adjacency pairs can be used to humours effect as they take us by surprise