American politics. Flashcards

1
Q

When and where was the US constitution ratified and created?

A

The creation of the Us constitution at the Philadelphia convention, and its ratification in 1789 forged the 13 formerly British colonies into the new, sovereign country of the United states of America.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the US constitution?

A

The codified document is divided into seven articles with the subsequent addition of 27 amendments and outlines the powers of each branch of government and how the new country would operate as a democracy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is it mean if it is entrenched?

A

The US constitution is entrenched, ensuring it cannot be easily changed. Importantly, the constitution requires a clear majority, a ‘supermajority’ in order for any amendment to be added to it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the three branches of government and what do they do?

A

Congress: all legislative power: power to lay and collect taxes: regulate commerce: coin money: declare war: veto: impeachment: investigation: ratifying treaties and appointments.

President: recommend legislation: sign or veto legislation: commander in chief: nomination of judges: power of pardon.

Supreme Court: judicial power.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the amendment process?

A
  • Article V explains how amendments to the US constitution can be made.
  • The ability to amend the Constitution was crucial in getting the document ratified - a number of states refused to agree to this new constitution without a number of changes.
  • Federal level: proposal stage: Two-thirds of both house and congress agree to propose an amendment.
    Two thirds of states call a national constitutional convention, which proposes an amendment.

States level - ratification stage:

  • Three-quarters of state legislature ratify the amendment.
  • Three quarters of states hold state constitutional conventions and vote to ratify the amendment.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How many amendments have there been to the US constitution?

A

27:
- The Bill of rights.
- The 12th, 20th, 22nd and 25 which all clarify the presidential election and succession procedures.
- The Civil war amendments which ensure that all recently freed slaves will be treated equally under the constitution.
- The 16th, which allows Congress to raise income tax and is the only amendment which overturned a Supreme Court ruling.
- The 17th, which makes the role of senator elected rather than appointed.
- The 18th and 21st which respectively ban and then allow the production and sale of alcohol.
- The 19th and 26th, which change voting eligibility removing gender requirements and lowering the voting age to 18.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the advantages of the amendment process?

A
  • The requirement for supermajorities ensures the broad support of the US population for any amendment.
  • It protects the Constitution from being changed by a short-lived popular opinion.
  • It prevents tyranny of the larger states over the small by valuing each state equally in the process and of the federal government by requiring state approval.
  • It works - there have been amendments to the constitution,
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the advantages of the amendment process?

A
  • The requirement for a supermajority makes it very difficult to pass any amendments meaning the constitution may become outdated.
  • The requirement for super majorities makes it possible to ignore minority interests.
  • Mistakes have been made - the 18th amendment later repealed by the 21st amendment showing the process is not rigorous enough.
  • It is possible for a small number of states to prevent an amendment passing.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the principles of the constitution?

A

The Founding Fathers wrote the constitution using a number of key principles.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is federalism?

A

A federal government is one in which two levels of government exist, with both having their own powers. In the US constitution, these two levels are ‘federal’ government and the state governments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How does the constitution protect the power of the states and federal government?

A

Protecting the power of states:

  • 10th amendment.
  • The states control the running of elections.
  • Frequent, staggered election cycle.
  • States appoint their senators.

Protecting the power of federal government:

  • Enumerated powers in Articles I, II and III.
  • Implied powers.
  • The power to raise tax so federal government would be funded.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Separation of powers, checks and balances.

A

The Founding fathers applied the principle of separation of powers within the Constitution. This means that each of the three branches of government must remain completely independent of the others, be selected by different processes and no one is allowed to be a member of more than one branch.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What else did they do?

A

In addition to simply dividing the powers of government between these three branches, the Founding fathers also gave each branch the ability to limit the actions of another branch. This is known as checks and balances.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the checks by Congress?

A
  • Override of the presidential veto by a two-thirds vote in both Houses of Congress.
  • Power of the purse - Congress, as the representatives of the taxpayers, controls the budget and therefore any money that the president is allocated.
  • The Senate can ratify or reject treaties and appointments put to them by the president.
  • Congress can impeach the president for treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the checks by the president?

A
  • Veto any legislation from Congress.
  • Recommend legislation to Congress at the State of the Union address.
  • Power of the pardon.
  • Nomination of federal offices and judges.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is bipartisanship?

A
  • The constitution was not written with parties in mind, bit it does have some safeguards which prevent them being too powerful. It allows for different groups to control different branches.
  • The staggered election cycle, with the House of representatives elected every 2 years, the president every 4 years and the Senate every 6 years. This means a different party could control each branch of government and forces representatives to be frequently accountable to their constituents.
  • Super majorities are required in some circumstances, such as for constitutional amendments and to override the presidential veto: this requires party cooperation.
  • The checks and balances written in the constitution mean that in order to achieve anything, the different branches of government must work together.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is federalism like today?

A
  • While the federal-state relationship is constantly changing, depending on national circumstances and the administration, some things do remain clear today.
  • Federal government controls foreign policy.
  • The use of the ‘commerce clause’ in the constitution has allowed federal government greater control over the states.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is the extent of democracy within the US constitution?

A
  • Liberal democracy: in which equality of rights, protection of rights and free and fair elections are of paramount importance.
  • Representative democracy: in which people elect officials to represent them in institutions of government.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What are the strengths and weaknesses of the US constitution?

A

Strength:

  • The principles of government are clearly set out and the document is judiciable making it diffucult for any branch to become tyrannical.
  • The vague nature of the constitution ensures that its meaning can be reinterpreted over time.
  • Article V allows for amendments and clearly works.

Weaknesses:

  • The Constitution is more rigid and therefore can become outdated.
  • Branches of government can take advantage of the vagueness which could allow them to expand their power.
  • The amendment process is incredibly slow.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What are the impacts of the US constitution on the US government today?

A
  • The US Constitution not only outlines how government should work, but places considerable constraints on it too. It is important to recognize that this is not about strengths and weaknesses but about government.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What are the positive and negative impacts?

A

Positive impacts:

  • Each branch of government is given explicit powers which cannot be removed, ensuring each branch remains relevant, even in terms of divided government.
  • Frequent elections forces representatives to listen to their constituents ensuring legitimacy of government.
  • The acceptance of judicial review means that disagreements can be settled in the Supreme Court.
  • The necessity for branches to work together through checks and balances means that majority interests are usually upheld, which should increase support for government.

Negative impacts:

  • Separation of powers and checks and balances can lead to gridlock meaning that government is not governing.
  • Federalism means that sovereignty is shared and not only reduces the power given to federal government but also allows the states to sue the federal government.
  • The role of judicial review means minorities or minority views have been able to stall the functions of government.
  • The vagueness of the Constitution has meant loopholes have been exploited such as executive orders allowing for the dominance of one branch over another.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is the structure of the US congress?

A

BIcameral nature:

  • The founding fathers ensured that Congress had two chambers, the House of Representatives and the Senate. Congress was thereby able to apply a number of key principles required by the framers.
  • Checks and balances in which checks took place within the legislative branch as well as between the executive, legislature and judiciary.
  • The creation of different term lengths, providing different types of representation within Congress with senators being far less sensitive to public opinion than members of the House of Representatives.
  • Protection of state interests - the driving force behind the creation of a Senate in which all states were given an equal number of politicians, regardless of population.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

The membership of Congress.

A

There are minor differences in the constitutional requirements for membership of each of the two chambers of congress. While senators are required to be at least 30 years of age and to have been a citizen for 9 years, members of the House need only be 25 and to have been citizens for 7 years.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What are the diffferences between the House of Representatives and the Senate?

A
The House of Representatives: 
Total membership: 
435. 
- Representative. 
- 2 years. 
- District. 
- Roughly proportional to population. 

The Senate:

  • Senator.
  • 6 years.
  • State.
  • Two.
25
Q

Who is the most powerful person in the House?

A

The most powerful person in the House is the speaker. This is a political position, with the House majority party choosing the speaker to act as its leader. The speaker attempts to unify the party and provide policy leadership, often determining the agenda of the majorty party and therefore the House in general.

26
Q

What is the House majority leader viewed as?

A

The House majority leader is best viewed as the speaker’s deputy. The minority leader in each chamber heads the minority party. These minority leaders will aim to become speaker or majority leader after future congressional elections.

27
Q

What is the election cycle?

A

House and Senate elections take place every 2 years, using first past the post. All members of the House are elected every 2 years. While all senators are elected for a 6-year term, by staggering senate elections, the composition of the Senate can be altered at frequent intervals.

28
Q

What are midterm elections?

A

Midterm elections take place every 4 years, and are often seen as a referendum on the first 2 years of a presidency. While the president is not on the ballot, many voters use these elections to provide a check on the president’s agenda, with the president’s party typically facing defeat, losing seats.

29
Q

Why are they significant?

A
  • The president can experience a major decline in power.
  • Midterms can lead to a change in policy direction of the country.
  • They can lead to legislative gridlock between president and congress.
30
Q

What is the distribution of powers within Congress?

A

The exclusive powers of each chamber - the House.

  • To impeach. This occurs when the House brings formal charges against any public official.
  • To elect the president if no candidate recieves over 50% of the electoral college: In this scenario each state is given one vote in the House of representatives.
  • To begin consideration of money bills: All revenue raising bills have to pass through the House first.
31
Q

What are the concurrent powers of Congress?

A

Congress is given the following concurrent powers by the Constitution:

  • Legislation: Article I gives all legislative power to Congress with both chambers’ approval required for legislation to be enacted.
  • Amending the constitution: This power is shared with the states, with two-thirds of each chamber of Congress being required to change the US constitution.
  • To declare war: While there is a constitutional ambiguity here, given the president’s position as commander-in-chief, the Founding Fathers gave Congress the power to begin military conflict.
32
Q

What are the functions of Congress?

A
  • Representation.
  • Legislation.
  • Oversight.
33
Q

Representation.

A

The electoral system:

- The use of a first-past-the-post system leads to tthe creation of safe seats.

34
Q

What are the factors affecting voting behaviour within Congress?

A

Parties:
- Members of Congress often vote along party lines.

Constituency:
- Senstitivity to public opinion is particularly strong, given the separation of powers which helps to make members of Congress more accountable to constituents than party leaders.

Pressure groups:
- Pressure groups are influential over politicians.

35
Q

What is the Supreme Court?

A

The Supreme Court is outlined in Article III of the US constitution.

36
Q

What does Article III state?

A
  • Judicial power is vested in the Supreme Court.
  • Congress can establish courts.
  • Justices have life tenure.
  • The Supreme Court is an appellate court.
37
Q

What is the independent nature of the Supreme Court?

A

The independence of the Supreme Court is guaranteed constitutionally.

38
Q

Constitutionally.

A
  • Justices are appointed not elected.

- Separation of powers means the Supreme Court has its own power outlined within the Constitution.

39
Q

The judicial review process.

A

Judicial review is more widely accepted than it is in the UK.

40
Q

How many cases does the Supreme Court get sent?

A

Today, the Supreme Court gets sent around 8,000 cases for review each year of which it will hear between 80 and 100.

41
Q

What happens if the Supreme Court finds a law or action unconstitutional?

A

If the Supreme Court finds a law or action unconstitutional, that law becomess null and void. This means it does not have to be repealed, it simply ceases to be a law and cannot be enforced.

42
Q

What is the appointment process for the Supreme Court?

A

Vacancy: Occurs through death, retirement or impeachment of another justice.

Search and nomination: Looking for a justice who is well qualified and suits a president’s wishes.

ABA rating: The ABA will review and rate a candidate not qualified, qualified or well qualified.

Senate judiciary committee hearings and vote: A committee of 20 senators who spend days interviewing candidates as to their suitability after which a recommendatory vote is taken.

Full senate vote: As the Constitution requires the advice and consent of Senate, the full Senate votes on a nominee.

43
Q

What are the strengths and weaknesses of this process?

A

Weaknesses:

  • The process has become party political.
  • The president has poliiticised the nomination.
  • The Senate judiciiary comittee hearings have become a show.
  • The role of the media undermines the process.
  • Expectations of replacing vacanies with like-for-like candidates undermine the ability to pick the best candidate for the job.

Strengths:

  • The lengthy and rigorous process ensures that candidates are legally qualified and capable of holding this position.
  • The role of elected officials in the process lends legitimacy to a branch which is otherwise unelected and therefore unaccountable and yet wields considerable power.
44
Q

What are the factors influencing the president’s choice of nomineee?

A

Ideology: While judges do not categorise themselves as liberal or conservative, it is possible to surmise whether a justice has liberal or conservative leanings by looking at their past rulings. A president

Personal characteristics: A president may wish to balance the Court in terms of gender or ethnicity.

Experience: The appointment process is rigorous and it is embarrassing if a presidential appointee fails, so candidates are expected to have the relevant experience. Most will come from circuit courts but elena Kagan came from the Justice Department.

The outgoing justices: Within reason, it is expected that a president should appoint a justice with a similiar ideology to that of the outgoing justice.

45
Q

What is the current composition and ideological balance of the Supreme Court?

A

A court is always named after its chief justice. The current court is therefore the Roberts.

The current court retains the balance it has had for a number of decades - that is roughly four liberals, four conservatives and one swing justice. While this looks like a well-balanced court, it is worth remembering that in around two-thirds of Supreme Court cases, the rulings are not 5-4, suggesting factors other than ideology were considered.

Even in 5-4 cases, it is not always the swing justice who decides the case. John Roberts sided with the liberals in finding for Obamacare in the 2010 case of NFIB v Sebelius.

46
Q

What is the impact of the Supreme Court on public policy in the USA?

A

Any ruling that the Supreme Court makes has the effect of being sovereign- this is because the Court is ruling in accordance with the Constitution, the sovereign document governing US politics. Therefore, the rulings it makes, based on this document can fundamentally change the landscape of the USA.

Table 22 is just a selection of cases and is not definitive.

47
Q

What are some cases that have had an impact?

A

Snyder v Phelps: Affirmed the extent of free speech as protected by the 1st Amendment.

King v Burwell: Upheld Obamacare again.

Citizens United V FEC: Struck down some campaign finance limits as not compatible with the 1st amendment.

Whole Woman’s health v Hellerstedt: Prevented Texas placing limits on abortion services for women.

McDonald v Chicago: Allowed for the possession of handguns, ovverruling a citywide ban.

Fisher v University of Texas: Allowed for the use of a racially-conscious admissions programme to the university.

48
Q

What is clear in these cases?

A

Table 22 is just a selection of cases, and is not definitive. However, in each case, what is clear is that the Supreme Court has had a fundamental on public policy in the USa - this may be upholding or striking down either state or federal law. It is also important to note that when they have decided against the government, state or federal, these rulings have been implemented despite the Supreme Court having no method to force their implementation. Texas for example, could have ignored the 2016 ruling regarding abortion but to do so would be to go against the Constitution as ruled by the Supreme Court, so despite disagreeing it adhered to the ruling.

49
Q

What are two ways we can describe the actions of the Supreme Court?

A

Judicial activism and restraint are ways in which we can describe the action of the Supreme Court. An activist justice will be more willing to hear cases and ensure that the outcome is based on the good of society as he or she sees it, whereas a restrained justice will believe irresoective of this, a judgement should be made on the Constitution or by looking to be elected, accountable branches of government.

It is possible for a justice of either ideology to be active or restrained - the Roberts Court for example could be characterised as conservative activist, with rulings such as Citizens United overturning previous court rulings and establishing a conservative precedent.

50
Q

What does Judicial activism mean?

A

An approach to judicial decision making that holds that a justice should use his or her position to promote a desirable social end.

51
Q

What does judicial restraint mean?

A

An approach to judicial decision making that holds that a justice should defer to the executive and legislative branches, which are politically accountable to the people, and should put great stress on the principle established in previous court decisions.

52
Q

What are the criticisms of these approaches?

A

Criticisms of judicial activisms:

  • The Supreme Court is unelected and therefore unaccountable.
  • It goes against the theory of separation of powers.
  • It can overrule theimportant principle of stare decisis.
  • There are limited checks on the Supreme Court to balance this power.
  • It undermines the Court’s neutrality and independence.

Criticisms of judicial restraint:

  • Deference by the Supreme Court can lead to breaches of the Constitution going unchecked.
  • Congress and the president often avoid the most controversial topics.
  • Without interpretation, the Constitution could become outdated and irrevelant.
  • The role of the Supreme Court is outlined in the Constitution and therefore it needs to act to uphold this.
  • Rights apply to all, not just the majority, yet the elected branches will focus on the latter.
53
Q

What are the top 8 landmark cases?

A

DC v Heller/McDonald v Chicago:
- Overturned gun control laws in federal areas and then extended this to states. Ruling that 2nd amendment gives all citizens the right to bear arms. 5-4 conservative block including Kennedy.

Why was it significant?

  • Conservative decision overturning state laws.
  • Upholds the Second Amendment.
  • Could be argued to be protecting key rights, and supporting the rights of minority interests, but also could be argued that the court is involving itself in key political issues and going against the will of the majority of people and the actions of democratically elected officials.

Citizens United v FEC:
- Can spending in elections by private groups be restricted? No - 5-4 decision.

Why was it significant?

  • Huge impact on elections.
  • Triple activism.

NFIB v Sebelius:
- Is Obamacare unconstitutional.

Why is it significant?
- Making people buy something: Supreme Court decided yes: 5-4: Roberts was swing vote.

Arizona v US:
- Explores the constitutionality of Arizona’s show me your papers which intends to tackle concerns regarding immigration.

Why is it significant?
- A 5-3 decision in which Kennedy and Roberts join the remaining liberals.

Shelby County v Holder:
- Ensures states don’t pass laws denying American citizens the vote.

Why is it significant?
- 5-4 Conservative decision - another Conservative activist decision.

54
Q

What are some free speech cases?

A

Packingham v North Carolina:
- Overturns a N Carolina statute which bans convicted sex offenders from accessing social media sities.

Why is it significant?
9-0 decision: Upholds 1st Amendment rights but arguably against states’ rights/. Shows the constitution and court uphold the rights of all citizens and evolve to deal with new tech. Some may use this as evidence of rights being too strong/problems with a rigid constitution.

US v Alvarez:
- Strikes down the Stolen Valour Act as unconstitutional.

Why is it significant?

  • 6-3: Robets and Kennedy join liberals.
  • Overturns an Act of Congress.
55
Q

What is affirmative action?

A

Institutions providing extra opportunities for minorities.

56
Q

How has it been used?

A

Quotas.
Extra credit.
“Some consideration”.

57
Q

What are the arguments for and against?

A

For:

  • It works.
  • Provides incentives for people to strive to emulate the achievements of the most successful.
  • Seen as a type of welfare focused on specific and racial groups.
  • Makes no sense to abandon a project that has been successful when it has been incomplete.
  • Surely makes more sense to further increase the number of people who are fully participating in society.

Against:

  • It is counter-productive. Those most harmed by it are the very groups it was intended to benefit.
  • Inevitable that the USA has an unequal society.
  • Modern minority groups from Southeast Asia and India were seen as having done well despite not speaking English upon arrival from the USA.
  • People will become too reliant on affirmative action and won’t do as well.
  • Just isn’t fair.
58
Q

What key developments have there been in terms of the Trump Administration and Race?

A

2016 campaign:

  • Bad hombres: Trump vowed to if elected, get rid of ‘bad hombres’ and deport drug dealers.
  • This was said when Trump was debating with Hilary Clinton in the third and final presidential debate.

Muslim ban:
- Trump won in the Supreme Court when they ruled 5-4 in favour of Trump’s travel ban on several Muslim-majority countries.

Border security:
- Trump said during his campaign that he wanted to build a wall along the US-Mexico border in order to stop illegal immigrants entering the US.