All of em

Question 1

Ecological consequences of sea ice decline

Answer 1

Post et al., 2013- underpin

NOAA (n.d)- cryosphere

Moline et al., 2004- peninsula

Darnis et al, 2012- cod

NSIDC (n.d.)- an vs ar

Question 2

Fisheries

Answer 2

Kroodsma et al., 2018- 4x

McCauley et al., 2015- mobility

Pauly and Zeller, 2016- keep up

Pinsky et al, 2011- large bodied

Pinsky et al, 2013- velocity

Ames, 2004- cod

Question 3

Flooding and flood controls

Answer 3

Morozova, 2005- Mesopotamia

Zsamboky et al., 2011- coastal

Kabat et al, 2009- 1 in 1,250

Kabat et al, 2005- 60%

Temmerman and Kirwan, 2015- Deltas pros and cons

Temmerman et al., 2013- reclaimed

Question 4

Water

Answer 4

Lazarus, 2014- land

Rulli et al., 2013- water

Pearce, 2013- important

Oki and Kanae, 2006- accelerate

Vorosmarty et al., 2010- 80%

Question 5

Velocity of climate change

Answer 5

Pinsky et al., 2013- velocity

McCauley et al., 2015- profoundly

Loarie et al., 2009- mountains

Lazarus and McGill, 2014- 10s, contend

Hobbs et al., 2009- ecotone

Ellis, 2011- anthromes

Question 6

Ecosystem responses to climate change

Answer 6

Parmesan, 2006- 0.7

Mohan et al., 2006- poison ivy

Parmesan, 2006- 1 - 44 days

Both et al., 2006- Phenological

Lonsdorf et al., 2011- 75%

Baker et al., 2004- symbiont

Question 7

Conservation

Answer 7

Spellerberg and Hardes, 1992- biological conservation

State of the world’s plants- 21%

Seddon et al., 2016- 10%

CITES- 5,600

CBD- in situ

Forestry Commission- SAC

Thiers, 2006- 3000 herbaria

Burke, 2005- Education

Miranto, 2005- Genetic problems

IUCN- translocation

Willis et al, 2009- Marbled white