All cases Flashcards
Literal rule
LNER v Berriman, Fatal accidents Act 1846
DPP v Cheeseman, Town and police clauses ACT 1847
Golden rule
Narrow: R v Allen, Offences against the person Act 1861
Broad: Adler v George, Official secrets Act 1920
Mischief rule
Smith v Hughes, Street offences Act 1959
Royal college of nursing (RCN) v DHSS, Abortions Act 1967
Purposive approach
Jones v TBC, Race relations Act 1976
R v RG ex parte smith, Adoption Act 1976
Ejusdem generis (same kind)
Powell v KPR co, Betting Act
Expressio unius est exclusio alterius (explicit mention of one thing)
Inhabitants of Sedgeley
Noscitur a sociis (known by its associates)
Pengelly v BP co
factual causation
R v Pagett, R v White
Legal causation
R v Smith, R v Jordan
thin skull rule
R v Blaue
Victims own actions
R v Roberts, R v Williams
De minimus
R v Cheshire
transferred malice
R v Latimer, R v Pembliton
Duty of contract
R v Pittwood
Duty arising from a relationship
R v Gibbins + Proctor
Duty from voluntary assumption of care
R v Stone + Dobinson
Duty arising from public office
R v Dytham
Duty arising from creating a dangerous situation
R v Miller, R v Santa Bermudez
Direct intention
R v Mohan
Oblique intention
R v Woollin
Recklessness
R v Cunningham
Voluntary Act definition
Bratty
Voluntary Act
Hill v Baxter
State of affairs
R v Larsonneur, Winzar
Coincidence
R v Thabo Meli, single act transaction
Fagan v MPC, continuing act
Gestures/Actions causing assault
Read v Coker
Spoken words/silence causing assault
R v Ireland
Written words
R v Constanza
Certain things can cancel a threat
Tuberville v Savage
V can still apprehend even if D can’t use force
DPP v Logdon
Immediate can also mean near future
Smith v CCoW
(S)lightest touch
R v Thomas
Hostile
Wilson v Pringle
Indirectly e.g. object
DPP v K
harm cannot be so trivial as to be wholly insignificant
R v Chan Fook
Injuries affect health or comfort of every day life
R v Miller
ABH can be cutting hair
DPP v Smith
ABH can be a short loss of conciousness
DPP v T
ABH only needs mens rea for assault or battery
R v Savage
A wound must go through two layers of outer skin
JCC v Eisenhower
S.20
R v Mowatt
S.18
R v Belfon
GBH is really serious harm not life threatening
DPP v Smith
GBH can be psychiatric
R v Burstow
GBH can be biological
R v Dica
GBH can be accumulation of injuries
R v Brown and Stratton
GBH can factor age, health and frailty
R v Bollom
GBH can be committed indirectly
R v Martin
Original Precedent
Donoghue v Stevenson
Binding
Grant v Australian Knitting Mill
Persuasive
R v R
Exceptions for CoA
Young v BA co
criminal overruling
R v Shivpuri overruled Anderton v Ryan
civil overruling
Pepper v Hart overruled Davis v Johnson
Civil distinguishing
Merritt v Merritt distinguished Balfour v Balfour
Criminal reversing
R v Hasan
Appeal against conviction
R v George
Appeal against sentence case(s)
R v Herbert and R v Philpott