Ainsworth strange situation Flashcards
1
Q
what are some strengths
A
high reliability
2
Q
why does it have high reliability
A
- many observers present and almost a perfect agreement of 94% was found between observers
- findings of an observation are classified as meaningful if there is an agreement between observer so this study has a high inter-rater reliability
3
Q
what are some limitations
A
- conclusions oversimplified as other type of attachment present
- culture bias
- methodological issues
4
Q
who found that the conclusions of Ainsworth situation were oversimplified
A
Main & Solomon
5
Q
what did Main & Solomon do
A
- they analysed over 200 strange situation videos and proposed that there was a fourth type of attachment called insecure-disorganised which was characterised by a lack of consistent pattern of social behaviour
- proposed some infants don’t have a consistent type of attachment and lack the ability to deal with the stress fo separation
6
Q
what research supports Main & Solomon and how
A
Van ijzendoorn et al conducted a meta-analysis of studies in the US and found 15% had an insecure-disorganised attachment type
7
Q
what did the findings of Main & Solomon suggest
A
that Ainsworth original conclusion were oversimplified as they did not account for all attachment behaviours
8
Q
why is the study culturally biased
A
- the theory and method of Ainsworth study was based on western ideals in relation to infant behaviour, which caused a high proportion of kids from other countries to be categorised as insecure attached
- therefore they were thought to develop less stable relationships in the future which was not always the case
- infants in different cultures are raised differently so will respond differently to certain thing; in the US a child from Japan may seem insecure attached however in Japan he would be considered securely attached
- this means Ainsworth findings cannot be generalised to other cultures
9
Q
why does the study have methodological issues
A
- overt observation so the mothers knew they were being observed with their infant and may have displayed demand characteristics
- they may have acted more affectionate which could have altered he children’s behaviour in return making the results inaccurate